Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with Child-Pugh B: A multicenter retrospective study.

551 Background: The phase 3 CheckMate 9DW trial proposed that nivolumab plus ipilimumab (Nivo/Ipi) significantly improved the survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) compared with sorafenib or lenvatinib as first-line treatment, but it only included patients with Child-Pugh A. Given the limited treatment options for patients with poor liver function, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of Nivo/Ipi in aHCC patients, stratified by liver function. Methods: This study included patients with aHCC who received Nivo/Ipi treatment at three referral hospitals between March 2020 and September 2023. Patients received nivolumab (1 mg/kg) plus ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) every 3 weeks (four doses), followed by nivolumab (240 mg) every 2 weeks. Results: Of 106 patients treated with Nivo/Ipi, 96 evaluable patients were included in the final analysis. Among them, 76 patients had Child-Pugh A, while 20 had Child-Pugh B. The baseline characteristics were generally comparable between the two groups, except for a significantly higher rate of extrahepatic metastasis in patients with Child-Pugh A (86.8% vs. 65.0%, p = 0.043) and a higher incidence of macrovascular invasion in patients with Child-Pugh B (55.0% vs. 27.6%, p = 0.032). The objective response rate (ORR) was 28.9% (22/76, 4 complete responses [CR] and 18 partial responses [PR]) in the Child-Pugh A group and 10.0% (2/20; 0 CR and 2 PR) in the Child-Pugh B group. Disease control rates were 42.1% in the Child-Pugh A group and 25.0% in the Child-Pugh B group. In a median follow-up duration of 29.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.8-29.8), the median overall survival (OS) was 8.9 months (95% CI, 5.5-17.6) in the Child-Pugh A group and 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.1-4.8) in the Child-Pugh B group (p < 0.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.6 months (95% CI, 1.2-3.5) in the Child-Pugh A group and 1.2 months (95% CI, 0.8-2.1) in the Child-Pugh B group (p = 0.003). Adverse events of any grade occurred at a comparable rate between the two groups, although immune-related adverse events were significantly more frequent in the Child-Pugh A group. Multivariable analysis indicated that Child-Pugh B was consistently associated with a worse PFS and OS, while prior exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) was associated with a poorer PFS. Notably, both responders with Child-Pugh B were both ICI naïve. Conclusions: While Nivo/Ipi treatment showed reduced efficacy in patients with Child-Pugh B, identifying potential responders beyond the current clinical trial criteria may offer opportunities to improve outcomes in this challenging population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.551
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with Child-Pugh B: A multicenter retrospective study.

Chansik An, Il Hwan Kim, Hong Jae Chon, Beodeul KANG et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with Child-Pugh B: A multicenter retrospective study.

Chansik An, Il Hwan Kim, Hong Jae Chon, Beodeul KANG, Youngun Kim, Chan Kim, Jung Sun Kim, Hyeyeong Kim
article en

Abstract

551 Background: The phase 3 CheckMate 9DW trial proposed that nivolumab plus ipilimumab (Nivo/Ipi) significantly improved the survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) compared with sorafenib or lenvatinib as first-line treatment, but it only included patients with Child-Pugh A. Given the limited treatment options for patients with poor liver function, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of Nivo/Ipi in aHCC patients, stratified by liver function. Methods: This study included patients with aHCC who received Nivo/Ipi treatment at three referral hospitals between March 2020 and September 2023. Patients received nivolumab (1 mg/kg) plus ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) every 3 weeks (four doses), followed by nivolumab (240 mg) every 2 weeks. Results: Of 106 patients treated with Nivo/Ipi, 96 evaluable patients were included in the final analysis. Among them, 76 patients had Child-Pugh A, while 20 had Child-Pugh B. The baseline characteristics were generally comparable between the two groups, except for a significantly higher rate of extrahepatic metastasis in patients with Child-Pugh A (86.8% vs. 65.0%, p = 0.043) and a higher incidence of macrovascular invasion in patients with Child-Pugh B (55.0% vs. 27.6%, p = 0.032). The objective response rate (ORR) was 28.9% (22/76, 4 complete responses [CR] and 18 partial responses [PR]) in the Child-Pugh A group and 10.0% (2/20; 0 CR and 2 PR) in the Child-Pugh B group. Disease control rates were 42.1% in the Child-Pugh A group and 25.0% in the Child-Pugh B group. In a median follow-up duration of 29.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.8-29.8), the median overall survival (OS) was 8.9 months (95% CI, 5.5-17.6) in the Child-Pugh A group and 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.1-4.8) in the Child-Pugh B group (p < 0.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.6 months (95% CI, 1.2-3.5) in the Child-Pugh A group and 1.2 months (95% CI, 0.8-2.1) in the Child-Pugh B group (p = 0.003). Adverse events of any grade occurred at a comparable rate between the two groups, although immune-related adverse events were significantly more frequent in the Child-Pugh A group. Multivariable analysis indicated that Child-Pugh B was consistently associated with a worse PFS and OS, while prior exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) was associated with a poorer PFS. Notably, both responders with Child-Pugh B were both ICI naïve. Conclusions: While Nivo/Ipi treatment showed reduced efficacy in patients with Child-Pugh B, identifying potential responders beyond the current clinical trial criteria may offer opportunities to improve outcomes in this challenging population.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital (KR), CHA University Bundang Medical Center (KR), Ulsan University Hospital (KR), CHA University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.