Overall survival with fruquintinib versus placebo after adjusting for subsequent anticancer therapy in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer in the FRESCO-2 study.

171 Background: Fruquintinib is a highly selective, oral inhibitor of all 3 vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs -1, -2, and -3) that is approved by the US FDA and in the EU, UK, and Japan for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), regardless of biomarker status. The phase 3 FRESCO-2 study (NCT04322539) met its primary endpoint demonstrating significantly improved overall survival with fruquintinib + best supportive care (BSC) vs placebo + BSC. As patients may have received subsequent anticancer therapy after progression, understanding the impact on overall survival is important. This analysis examined overall survival data from FRESCO-2 after adjusting for subsequent anticancer therapy. Methods: In FRESCO-2, patients were randomized 2:1 to receive fruquintinib (5 mg) or matching placebo by mouth, once daily, 3 weeks on, 1 week off, + BSC. Eligible patients had received prior chemotherapy, anti-VEGF therapy, anti-EGFR therapies (if indicated), and TAS-102 and/or regorafenib. We assessed the impact of subsequent anticancer therapy on overall survival by excluding patients who received subsequent therapies, censoring these patients, and determining the causal hazard ratio using inverse probability of censoring weights (IPCW) and marginal structural models (MSM) to adjust for the potential bias introduced by subsequent treatments. Results: In FRESCO-2, a lower proportion of patients in the fruquintinib vs placebo arm received subsequent anticancer therapy (29.4% vs 34.3%). Among these patients, the most common subsequent anticancer therapies in the fruquintinib vs placebo arms were fluorouracil (7.7% vs 9.6%) and regorafenib (7.5% vs 7.8%). The overall survival benefit seen with fruquintinib vs placebo in the intent-to-treat population (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.66; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.55–0.80) was improved when patients who had received subsequent anticancer therapy were excluded (HR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.36–0.57) or censored (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.50–0.79). In addition, the overall survival benefit seen with fruquintinib vs placebo was improved after adjusting for subsequent anticancer therapy using IPCW (HR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.33–0.55) and MSM (HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.38–0.60). Patients receiving fruquintinib had similar rates of grade ≥3 adverse events, whether or not they received subsequent anticancer therapy (51.5% and 67.4%, respectively). Conclusions: Consistent with the primary analysis of the FRESCO-2 intent-to-treat population, fruquintinib improved overall survival vs placebo after adjusting for the impact of subsequent anticancer therapy. Furthermore, these analyses are robust with consistent results reported using IPCW and MSM. These findings support fruquintinib as a new treatment option for patients with previously treated mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT04322539 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.171
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Overall survival with fruquintinib versus placebo after adjusting for subsequent anticancer therapy in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer in the FRESCO-2 study.

Cathy Eng, Alberto Sobrero, Josep M. Tabernero, Violaine Randrian et al.
1 links
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
article

Overall survival with fruquintinib versus placebo after adjusting for subsequent anticancer therapy in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer in the FRESCO-2 study.

Cathy Eng, Alberto Sobrero, Josep M. Tabernero, Violaine Randrian, Andrew Scott Paulson, Arvind Dasari, Jiří Tomášek, Andrea Sartore‐Bianchi, Élena Elez, James C. Yao, Lucy F. Chen, Rocio García‐Carbonero, Sara Lonardi, Antonio Cubillo Gracián, Taroh Satoh, Liwen Wu, Takayuki Yoshino, Geoff Chong, Pilar García‐Alfonso, Judit Kocsis
article en

Abstract

171 Background: Fruquintinib is a highly selective, oral inhibitor of all 3 vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs -1, -2, and -3) that is approved by the US FDA and in the EU, UK, and Japan for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), regardless of biomarker status. The phase 3 FRESCO-2 study (NCT04322539) met its primary endpoint demonstrating significantly improved overall survival with fruquintinib + best supportive care (BSC) vs placebo + BSC. As patients may have received subsequent anticancer therapy after progression, understanding the impact on overall survival is important. This analysis examined overall survival data from FRESCO-2 after adjusting for subsequent anticancer therapy. Methods: In FRESCO-2, patients were randomized 2:1 to receive fruquintinib (5 mg) or matching placebo by mouth, once daily, 3 weeks on, 1 week off, + BSC. Eligible patients had received prior chemotherapy, anti-VEGF therapy, anti-EGFR therapies (if indicated), and TAS-102 and/or regorafenib. We assessed the impact of subsequent anticancer therapy on overall survival by excluding patients who received subsequent therapies, censoring these patients, and determining the causal hazard ratio using inverse probability of censoring weights (IPCW) and marginal structural models (MSM) to adjust for the potential bias introduced by subsequent treatments. Results: In FRESCO-2, a lower proportion of patients in the fruquintinib vs placebo arm received subsequent anticancer therapy (29.4% vs 34.3%). Among these patients, the most common subsequent anticancer therapies in the fruquintinib vs placebo arms were fluorouracil (7.7% vs 9.6%) and regorafenib (7.5% vs 7.8%). The overall survival benefit seen with fruquintinib vs placebo in the intent-to-treat population (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.66; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.55–0.80) was improved when patients who had received subsequent anticancer therapy were excluded (HR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.36–0.57) or censored (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.50–0.79). In addition, the overall survival benefit seen with fruquintinib vs placebo was improved after adjusting for subsequent anticancer therapy using IPCW (HR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.33–0.55) and MSM (HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.38–0.60). Patients receiving fruquintinib had similar rates of grade ≥3 adverse events, whether or not they received subsequent anticancer therapy (51.5% and 67.4%, respectively). Conclusions: Consistent with the primary analysis of the FRESCO-2 intent-to-treat population, fruquintinib improved overall survival vs placebo after adjusting for the impact of subsequent anticancer therapy. Furthermore, these analyses are robust with consistent results reported using IPCW and MSM. These findings support fruquintinib as a new treatment option for patients with previously treated mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT04322539 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), University of Milan (IT), Vanderbilt University (US), Texas Oncology (US), Austin Hospital (AU), Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (ES), Université de Poitiers (FR), Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre (ES), Bács-Kiskun Megyei Kórház (HU), Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IT), Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute (CZ), Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro (ES), Takeda (United States) (US), National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre (AU), Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (ES), Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, The University of Osaka (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.