QL1203 vs placebo plus mFOLFOX6 as first-line therapy in RAS wild-type, metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Interim analysis (IA) of a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, parallel, phase 3 trial.

190 Background: Panitumumab plus FOLFOX or FOLFIRI has been approved as the first-line therapy for RAS wild-type mCRC. QL1203 is a panitumumab biosimilar showing similarity to the originator panitumumab (Vectibix, Amgen) in preclinical studies and phase 1 clinical pharmacokinetic study. Here we present results from interim analysis of a phase 3 trial (NCT04233151) investigating QL1203 vs placebo plus mFOLFOX6 as first-line therapy in Chinese patients (pts) with RAS wild-type mCRC. Methods: Pts with treatment-naïve, RAS and BRAF wild-type, mCRC unsuitable for radical resection and local therapy were enrolled and randomly assigned (2:1) to receive QL1203 (6 mg/kg) plus mFOLFOX6 once every 2 weeks (Q2W) or placebo plus mFOLFOX6 Q2W, stratified by primary tumor site, liver metastases, and previous neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was PFS assessed by a Blinded Independ Review Committee (BICR) per RECIST v1.1. Key secondary endpoints include PFS by investigator (INV), OS, ORR, DoR, and safety. This planned IA was conducted at 338 (81.25%) of 416 PFS events occurred. Results: From Jan 8, 2020 to Jun 12, 2023, 641 pts were randomized (QL1203/placebo, n=426/215). 551 (86.0%) pts had left-sided tumors (QL1203/placebo, 85.9%/86.0%). 433 (67.6%) pts had liver metastases (QL1203/placebo, 68.1%/66.5%). As of data cutoff of this IA (Mar 22, 2024), median follow-up was 23.8 months. Median PFS by BIRC was 11.20 months for QL1203 and 8.34 months for placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61 [97.42% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-0.79]; stratified one-sided log-rank p<0.0001). Other efficacy results are presented (Table). Incidence of grade≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) related to study drug was 59.9% for QL1203 and 32.9% for placebo. The most common grade≥3 AE related to QL1203 was neutrophil count decreased (20.3%). Conclusions: QL1203 demonstrated significantly improved PFS versus placebo and higher ORR. Clinical trial information: NCT04233151 . QL1203 (n=426) Placebo (n=215) PFS by BIRC mPFS, months (95% CI) 11.20 (9.89-13.11) 8.34 (7.26-8.54) HR (97.42% CI) 0.61 (0.47-0.79) PFS by INV mPFS, months (95% CI) 10.91 (9.69-11.30) 8.41 (7.39-9.07) HR (95% CI) 0.74 (0.60-0.91) mOS, months (95% CI) 27.66 (24.74-32.79) 24.54 (20.17-27.79) HR (95% CI) 0.82 (0.64-1.06) ORR by BIRC, n (%) 68.31% 47.91% 95% CI 63.66-72.70 41.07-54.81 ORR by INV, n (%) 64.08% 49.30% 95% CI 59.33-68.65 42.44-56.19

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.190
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

QL1203 vs placebo plus mFOLFOX6 as first-line therapy in RAS wild-type, metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Interim analysis (IA) of a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, parallel, phase 3 trial.

Suxia Luo, Kaisheng Mao, Peng Du, Yanqiao Zhang et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
1.05
article

QL1203 vs placebo plus mFOLFOX6 as first-line therapy in RAS wild-type, metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Interim analysis (IA) of a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, parallel, phase 3 trial.

Suxia Luo, Kaisheng Mao, Peng Du, Yanqiao Zhang, Dajun Yu, Xiaoyan Kang, Yusheng Wang, Jingdong Zhang, Changzheng Li, Weijian Guo, Wenhui Yang, Yunfeng Li, Zhiwu Wang, Weie Zheng, Xianli Yin, Zhan Wang, Hailin Xiong, Nanfeng Fan, Zhongtao Zhang, Lin Shen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

190 Background: Panitumumab plus FOLFOX or FOLFIRI has been approved as the first-line therapy for RAS wild-type mCRC. QL1203 is a panitumumab biosimilar showing similarity to the originator panitumumab (Vectibix, Amgen) in preclinical studies and phase 1 clinical pharmacokinetic study. Here we present results from interim analysis of a phase 3 trial (NCT04233151) investigating QL1203 vs placebo plus mFOLFOX6 as first-line therapy in Chinese patients (pts) with RAS wild-type mCRC. Methods: Pts with treatment-naïve, RAS and BRAF wild-type, mCRC unsuitable for radical resection and local therapy were enrolled and randomly assigned (2:1) to receive QL1203 (6 mg/kg) plus mFOLFOX6 once every 2 weeks (Q2W) or placebo plus mFOLFOX6 Q2W, stratified by primary tumor site, liver metastases, and previous neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was PFS assessed by a Blinded Independ Review Committee (BICR) per RECIST v1.1. Key secondary endpoints include PFS by investigator (INV), OS, ORR, DoR, and safety. This planned IA was conducted at 338 (81.25%) of 416 PFS events occurred. Results: From Jan 8, 2020 to Jun 12, 2023, 641 pts were randomized (QL1203/placebo, n=426/215). 551 (86.0%) pts had left-sided tumors (QL1203/placebo, 85.9%/86.0%). 433 (67.6%) pts had liver metastases (QL1203/placebo, 68.1%/66.5%). As of data cutoff of this IA (Mar 22, 2024), median follow-up was 23.8 months. Median PFS by BIRC was 11.20 months for QL1203 and 8.34 months for placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61 [97.42% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-0.79]; stratified one-sided log-rank p<0.0001). Other efficacy results are presented (Table). Incidence of grade≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) related to study drug was 59.9% for QL1203 and 32.9% for placebo. The most common grade≥3 AE related to QL1203 was neutrophil count decreased (20.3%). Conclusions: QL1203 demonstrated significantly improved PFS versus placebo and higher ORR. Clinical trial information: NCT04233151 . QL1203 (n=426) Placebo (n=215) PFS by BIRC mPFS, months (95% CI) 11.20 (9.89-13.11) 8.34 (7.26-8.54) HR (97.42% CI) 0.61 (0.47-0.79) PFS by INV mPFS, months (95% CI) 10.91 (9.69-11.30) 8.41 (7.39-9.07) HR (95% CI) 0.74 (0.60-0.91) mOS, months (95% CI) 27.66 (24.74-32.79) 24.54 (20.17-27.79) HR (95% CI) 0.82 (0.64-1.06) ORR by BIRC, n (%) 68.31% 47.91% 95% CI 63.66-72.70 41.07-54.81 ORR by INV, n (%) 64.08% 49.30% 95% CI 59.33-68.65 42.44-56.19

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
Harbin Medical University (CN), Capital Medical University (CN), Peking University (CN), Dalian University of Technology (CN), Wenzhou Medical University (CN), XinHua Hospital (CN), Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (CN), Peking University Cancer Hospital (CN), Tangshan People's Hospital (CN), Ruian People's Hospital (CN), Shandong Tumor Hospital (CN), Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital (CN), Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University (CN), Hunan Cancer Hospital (CN), Luye Pharma (China) (CN), Huizhou Central People's Hospital (CN), Henan Cancer Hospital (CN), Beijing Friendship Hospital (CN), Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College (CN), Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute (CN), Shandong First Medical University (CN), China Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.