Conversion from radical esophagectomy to definitive chemoradiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Treatment options based on chemotherapy response.

408 Background: Radical esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the established strategy for resectable advanced esophageal cancer. However, some patients convert to definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) after NAC due to reasons such as their wishes or disease progression, and their prognosis remains uncertain. We aimed to investigate the prognosis of patients who converted to dCRT. Methods: Patients who underwent NAC for resectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between 2006 and 2020 were enrolled retrospectively. The prognostic impact of subsequent treatment after NAC, planned surgery or conversion to dCRT, was compared. Results: We analyzed 686 patients, 70 who converted to dCRT (dCRT group) and 616 who underwent surgery (Surg group). The dCRT group had a poorer prognosis than the Surg group, with more advanced tumors and poorer response to NAC. Therefore, further analysis was conducted by categorizing patients as Responders (complete or partial response) and Non-responders (stable or progressive disease) to NAC. Among Responders in the dCRT group, 76.7% achieved a complete response, and the 5-year esophageal preservation survival rate was 66.9%. The 5-year survival rates for Responders were 77.5% and 71.3% in the dCRT and Surg groups. Multivariable analysis showed that dCRT did not worsen prognosis ( P = .706, hazard ratio = 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.59 to 2.16). Conversely, in Non-responders, dCRT had a significantly poorer prognosis, with 5-year survival rates of 22.3% and 45.1% in the dCRT and the Surg groups (P < .001). Conclusions: For patients responding to NAC, conversion to dCRT is considered a potential treatment option. The possibility of chemoselection has been suggested in the choice of treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.408
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conversion from radical esophagectomy to definitive chemoradiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Treatment options based on chemotherapy response.

Tetsuya Abe, Kiyoshi Narita, Masahiro Tajika, Yasuhiro Shimizu et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Conversion from radical esophagectomy to definitive chemoradiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Treatment options based on chemotherapy response.

Tetsuya Abe, Kiyoshi Narita, Masahiro Tajika, Yasuhiro Shimizu, Shigenori Kadowaki, Takeshi Kodaira, Kei Muro, Eiji Higaki, Hironori Fujieda, Shingo Hashimoto
article en

Abstract

408 Background: Radical esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is the established strategy for resectable advanced esophageal cancer. However, some patients convert to definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) after NAC due to reasons such as their wishes or disease progression, and their prognosis remains uncertain. We aimed to investigate the prognosis of patients who converted to dCRT. Methods: Patients who underwent NAC for resectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma between 2006 and 2020 were enrolled retrospectively. The prognostic impact of subsequent treatment after NAC, planned surgery or conversion to dCRT, was compared. Results: We analyzed 686 patients, 70 who converted to dCRT (dCRT group) and 616 who underwent surgery (Surg group). The dCRT group had a poorer prognosis than the Surg group, with more advanced tumors and poorer response to NAC. Therefore, further analysis was conducted by categorizing patients as Responders (complete or partial response) and Non-responders (stable or progressive disease) to NAC. Among Responders in the dCRT group, 76.7% achieved a complete response, and the 5-year esophageal preservation survival rate was 66.9%. The 5-year survival rates for Responders were 77.5% and 71.3% in the dCRT and Surg groups. Multivariable analysis showed that dCRT did not worsen prognosis ( P = .706, hazard ratio = 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.59 to 2.16). Conversely, in Non-responders, dCRT had a significantly poorer prognosis, with 5-year survival rates of 22.3% and 45.1% in the dCRT and the Surg groups (P < .001). Conclusions: For patients responding to NAC, conversion to dCRT is considered a potential treatment option. The possibility of chemoselection has been suggested in the choice of treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
Aichi Cancer Center (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.