Neoadjuvant therapy in borderline resectable and resectable pancreatic cancer.

735 Background: To improve clinical outcomes in borderline resectable and resectable pancreatic cancer patients, preoperative chemotherapy with or without radiation can be administered. According to NCCN, there is limited evidence to recommend a specific neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen. The Dutch randomized phase III PREOPANC trial showed that preoperative chemoradiotherapy led to improved disease free survival. We compared overall survival (OS) between two chemotherapy regimens; mFOLFIRINOX (mFOL) and Gemcitabine/nabPaclitaxel (Gem/nabP). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of biopsy-proven pancreatic cancer patients from 1/1/2019 to 2/1/2024. We included borderline resectable and resectable pancreatic cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and then underwent pancreatic resection. We divided them into two cohorts: those receiving mFOL and those receiving Gem/nabP. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to analyze OS and rates of R 0 resection amongst the two groups. A p-value < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant. Results: From January 2019 to January 2024, 85 pancreatic cancer patients received preoperative chemotherapy prior to pancreatic resection. 50 patients received mFOL and 35 patients received Gem/nabP. The mean overall survival (OS) for the mFOL group was 1,137 days, while for the Gem/nabP group it was 876 days. The hazard ratio was estimated as 1.692 (confidence interval 0.901- 3.177, p-value 0.10). After matching for pathological stage and grade, preoperative radiation, postoperative chemotherapy, and presence of perineural and lymphovascular invasion, the hazard ratio was 1.981 (p-value 0.065). The R 0 resection rate was 92.1% for mFOL and 82.2% for Gem/nabP. The odds ratio for having negative margins with mFOL compared to Gem/nabP was 2.005 with a p-value of 0.37. Conclusions: Preoperative chemotherapy with mFOL did not demonstrate improved OS compared to Gem/nabP. The probability of achieving negative margins was also similar amongst the two groups. The SWOG S1505 which is a randomized phase II trial comparing perioperative chemotherapy with mFOL versus Gem/nabP in resectable pancreatic cancer patients has also shown similar OS and progression free survival in both groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.735
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neoadjuvant therapy in borderline resectable and resectable pancreatic cancer.

Harmeet Kharoud, Dulabh Monga, Alexander S. Marwaha, Kojo-Frimpong B. Awuah et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Neoadjuvant therapy in borderline resectable and resectable pancreatic cancer.

Harmeet Kharoud, Dulabh Monga, Alexander S. Marwaha, Kojo-Frimpong B. Awuah, Kriti Dhamija
article en

Abstract

735 Background: To improve clinical outcomes in borderline resectable and resectable pancreatic cancer patients, preoperative chemotherapy with or without radiation can be administered. According to NCCN, there is limited evidence to recommend a specific neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen. The Dutch randomized phase III PREOPANC trial showed that preoperative chemoradiotherapy led to improved disease free survival. We compared overall survival (OS) between two chemotherapy regimens; mFOLFIRINOX (mFOL) and Gemcitabine/nabPaclitaxel (Gem/nabP). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of biopsy-proven pancreatic cancer patients from 1/1/2019 to 2/1/2024. We included borderline resectable and resectable pancreatic cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and then underwent pancreatic resection. We divided them into two cohorts: those receiving mFOL and those receiving Gem/nabP. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to analyze OS and rates of R 0 resection amongst the two groups. A p-value < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant. Results: From January 2019 to January 2024, 85 pancreatic cancer patients received preoperative chemotherapy prior to pancreatic resection. 50 patients received mFOL and 35 patients received Gem/nabP. The mean overall survival (OS) for the mFOL group was 1,137 days, while for the Gem/nabP group it was 876 days. The hazard ratio was estimated as 1.692 (confidence interval 0.901- 3.177, p-value 0.10). After matching for pathological stage and grade, preoperative radiation, postoperative chemotherapy, and presence of perineural and lymphovascular invasion, the hazard ratio was 1.981 (p-value 0.065). The R 0 resection rate was 92.1% for mFOL and 82.2% for Gem/nabP. The odds ratio for having negative margins with mFOL compared to Gem/nabP was 2.005 with a p-value of 0.37. Conclusions: Preoperative chemotherapy with mFOL did not demonstrate improved OS compared to Gem/nabP. The probability of achieving negative margins was also similar amongst the two groups. The SWOG S1505 which is a randomized phase II trial comparing perioperative chemotherapy with mFOL versus Gem/nabP in resectable pancreatic cancer patients has also shown similar OS and progression free survival in both groups.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
Allegheny Health Network (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.