Effect of SHR-1701 on chemotherapy (chemo)-induced myelosuppression: Data from a phase 3 study in HER2-negative gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEJA).

335 Background: Blocking TGF-β signaling has the potential to facilitate the recovery from chemo-induced myelosuppression. SHR-1701 is a bifunctional agent targeting PD-L1 and TGF-β. Methods: In the multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase 3 study (NCT04950322), SHR-1701 plus CAPOX demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefit in OS compared with placebo plus CAPOX in patients (pts) with previously untreated, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative G/GEJA (ESMO 2024, LBA60). Here, we reported the effect of SHR-1701 on chemo-associated myelosuppression. Results: In total, 364 and 366 pts in the SHR-1701 and placebo arm received assigned treatment. As of May 20, 2024, with a KM estimated median follow-up of 13.6 mo, all study medications showed similar exposure duration between the two arms (Table). Occurrence of treatment-related adverse events was generally comparable (any grade, 97.8% in SHR-1701 arm vs 98.4% in placebo arm; grade ≥3, 62.6% vs 59.0%). SHR-1701 reduced the incidence of any grade decreased platelet count, decreased neutrophil count, and decreased white blood cell count by 8.7%, 10.1%, and 11.2%, and for grade ≥3, by 9.1%, 4.3%, and 1.6%, respectively (Table). Compared with the placebo arm, less pts in the SHR-1701 arm used platelet growth factors (30.2% vs 42.9%) and white blood cell growth factors (32.7% vs 39.6%). Conclusions: SHR-1701 showed the capacity to suppress chemo-associated myelosuppression. Clinical trial information: NCT04950322 . Safety. SHR-1701 plus CAPOX(N=364) Placebo plus CAPOX(N=366) Treatment difference (SHR-1701 vs placebo) Treatment exposure (day), median (IQR) SHR-1701/placebo 137.0 (65.5-251.5) 127.5 (62.0-190.0) NA Capecitabine 122.0 (83.0-138.0) 122.0 (73.5-135.0) NA Oxaliplatin 107.0 (66.0-123.0) 108.5 (64.0-121.0) NA Treatment-related hematological toxicities, n (%) or % Any grade Grade ≥ 3 Any grade Grade ≥ 3 Any grade Grade ≥ 3 Platelet count decreased 217 (59.6%) 69 (19.0%) 250 (68.3%) 103 (28.1%) -8.7% -9.1% Neutrophil count decreased 163 (44.8%) 44 (12.1%) 201 (54.9%) 60 (16.4%) -10.1% -4.3% White blood cell count decreased 147 (40.4%) 13 (3.6%) 189 (51.6%) 19 (5.2%) -11.2% -1.6%

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.335
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of SHR-1701 on chemotherapy (chemo)-induced myelosuppression: Data from a phase 3 study in HER2-negative gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEJA).

Yueyin Pan, Zhi Peng, Qun Zhao, Zuoxing Niu et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
1.52
article

Effect of SHR-1701 on chemotherapy (chemo)-induced myelosuppression: Data from a phase 3 study in HER2-negative gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEJA).

Yueyin Pan, Zhi Peng, Qun Zhao, Zuoxing Niu, Jun Bai, Hongxia Han, Yigui Chen, Hongli Li, Jun Zhang, Junsheng Wang, Wenliang Wang, Xiao‐Dong Zhu, Kangsheng Gu, Zhigao Wang, Ying Cheng, Yanqiao Zhang, Shaozhong Wei, Zhongtao Zhang, Lin Shen, Jufeng Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

335 Background: Blocking TGF-β signaling has the potential to facilitate the recovery from chemo-induced myelosuppression. SHR-1701 is a bifunctional agent targeting PD-L1 and TGF-β. Methods: In the multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase 3 study (NCT04950322), SHR-1701 plus CAPOX demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefit in OS compared with placebo plus CAPOX in patients (pts) with previously untreated, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative G/GEJA (ESMO 2024, LBA60). Here, we reported the effect of SHR-1701 on chemo-associated myelosuppression. Results: In total, 364 and 366 pts in the SHR-1701 and placebo arm received assigned treatment. As of May 20, 2024, with a KM estimated median follow-up of 13.6 mo, all study medications showed similar exposure duration between the two arms (Table). Occurrence of treatment-related adverse events was generally comparable (any grade, 97.8% in SHR-1701 arm vs 98.4% in placebo arm; grade ≥3, 62.6% vs 59.0%). SHR-1701 reduced the incidence of any grade decreased platelet count, decreased neutrophil count, and decreased white blood cell count by 8.7%, 10.1%, and 11.2%, and for grade ≥3, by 9.1%, 4.3%, and 1.6%, respectively (Table). Compared with the placebo arm, less pts in the SHR-1701 arm used platelet growth factors (30.2% vs 42.9%) and white blood cell growth factors (32.7% vs 39.6%). Conclusions: SHR-1701 showed the capacity to suppress chemo-associated myelosuppression. Clinical trial information: NCT04950322 . Safety. SHR-1701 plus CAPOX(N=364) Placebo plus CAPOX(N=366) Treatment difference (SHR-1701 vs placebo) Treatment exposure (day), median (IQR) SHR-1701/placebo 137.0 (65.5-251.5) 127.5 (62.0-190.0) NA Capecitabine 122.0 (83.0-138.0) 122.0 (73.5-135.0) NA Oxaliplatin 107.0 (66.0-123.0) 108.5 (64.0-121.0) NA Treatment-related hematological toxicities, n (%) or % Any grade Grade ≥ 3 Any grade Grade ≥ 3 Any grade Grade ≥ 3 Platelet count decreased 217 (59.6%) 69 (19.0%) 250 (68.3%) 103 (28.1%) -8.7% -9.1% Neutrophil count decreased 163 (44.8%) 44 (12.1%) 201 (54.9%) 60 (16.4%) -10.1% -4.3% White blood cell count decreased 147 (40.4%) 13 (3.6%) 189 (51.6%) 19 (5.2%) -11.2% -1.6%

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
Hebei Medical University (CN), Harbin Medical University (CN), Shanxi Medical University (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Capital Medical University (CN), Anhui Medical University (CN), Peking University (CN), Ruijin Hospital (CN), Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (CN), Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (CN), Peking University Cancer Hospital (CN), Jilin Province Tumor Hospital (CN), Shandong Tumor Hospital (CN), Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University (CN), Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University (CN), Anhui Provincial Hospital (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (CN), Henan Cancer Hospital (CN), Beijing Friendship Hospital (CN), Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine (China) (CN), Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital (CN), Shanxi Provincial People’s Hospital (CN), Hubei Cancer Hospital (CN), Anyang Tumor Hospital (CN), Shandong First Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.