Bragg peak proton irradiation and ATM inhibition for rectal cancer.

259 Background: Rectal cancer patients with a complete response (CR) after chemotherapy and radiotherapy may opt for non-operative management. Currently only 20-40% of patients reach a CR. Escalating the dose of radiation may increase the risk of toxicity. ATM inhibitors (ATMi) are potent radiosensitizers in colorectal cancer (CRC). Proton irradiation exhibits an entrance portion of the beam (ENT) where dose is deposited sparsely and a Bragg Peak (BP) with virtually no ‘exit dose’ thereafter. ATMi renders cells uniquely hypersensitive to proton BP, and BP+ATMi may increase the response of Mismatch Repair proficient (pMMR) rectal cancer to immunotherapy. Methods: Tumor efficacy and immunogenicity was assessed using clonogenic survival, γH2AX foci, micronuclei, and cytoplasmic cGas assays after indicated IR modalities +/-ATMi. Normal tissue toxicity was assessed via murine models of non-tumor bearing BALB/c after whole-abdominal irradiation (WAI) after indicated IR modalities +/- ATMi via acute weight loss, FITC/Dextran assay, and Radiation Injury Score (RIS, Scale 0-18) in jejunal and rectal samples at 4 days post-IR. Results: ATMi decreased clonogenic survival across all types of radiation, but the effect was most pronounced with BP protons. BP+ATMi also significantly increased unresolved γH2AX foci, micronuclei, and cytoplasmic cGas compared to ENT+ATMi. Normal tissue toxicity studies demonstrated that BP+ATMi did not significantly increase acute weight loss, RIS in jejunal or rectal tissue; but did increase FITC/Dextran intestinal permeability. Conclusions: Inhibition of ATM preferentially radiosensitized BP protons compared to x-rays or ENT protons in CRC but not in normal tissue based on weight loss and histopathological evaluation. Differential tumor efficacy and normal tissue toxicity after x-ray, entrance and Bragg Peak Protons +/- ATM inhibitor. A B C D E F G H I J DMSO 1 1 1 2.9 1.5 8764 96.4 10 0.3 0.2 ATMi 0.873 0.842 0.723 8.2 3.0 16300 98.5 5.8 0.7 0.8 x-ray 0.615 0.751 0.109 82.4 6.2 4.8 1.0 x-ray+ATMi 0.123 0.344 0.011 80.0 14.4 5.2 1.5 ENT protons 0.293 0.515 0.080 10.2 5.8 10429 78.5 6 2.9 1.5 ENT+ATMi 0.091 0.066 0.013 15.1 7.2 12274 73.0 23.8 5.2 3.8 BP protons 0.213 0.340 0.032 12.0 12.6 7192 75.6 24.6 4.1 3.7 BP+ATMi 0.074 0.038 0.004 22.7 16.2 43677 73.6

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.259
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bragg peak proton irradiation and ATM inhibition for rectal cancer.

Cameron M. Callaghan, Sonja Dragojevic
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
article

Bragg peak proton irradiation and ATM inhibition for rectal cancer.

Cameron M. Callaghan, Sonja Dragojevic
article en

Abstract

259 Background: Rectal cancer patients with a complete response (CR) after chemotherapy and radiotherapy may opt for non-operative management. Currently only 20-40% of patients reach a CR. Escalating the dose of radiation may increase the risk of toxicity. ATM inhibitors (ATMi) are potent radiosensitizers in colorectal cancer (CRC). Proton irradiation exhibits an entrance portion of the beam (ENT) where dose is deposited sparsely and a Bragg Peak (BP) with virtually no ‘exit dose’ thereafter. ATMi renders cells uniquely hypersensitive to proton BP, and BP+ATMi may increase the response of Mismatch Repair proficient (pMMR) rectal cancer to immunotherapy. Methods: Tumor efficacy and immunogenicity was assessed using clonogenic survival, γH2AX foci, micronuclei, and cytoplasmic cGas assays after indicated IR modalities +/-ATMi. Normal tissue toxicity was assessed via murine models of non-tumor bearing BALB/c after whole-abdominal irradiation (WAI) after indicated IR modalities +/- ATMi via acute weight loss, FITC/Dextran assay, and Radiation Injury Score (RIS, Scale 0-18) in jejunal and rectal samples at 4 days post-IR. Results: ATMi decreased clonogenic survival across all types of radiation, but the effect was most pronounced with BP protons. BP+ATMi also significantly increased unresolved γH2AX foci, micronuclei, and cytoplasmic cGas compared to ENT+ATMi. Normal tissue toxicity studies demonstrated that BP+ATMi did not significantly increase acute weight loss, RIS in jejunal or rectal tissue; but did increase FITC/Dextran intestinal permeability. Conclusions: Inhibition of ATM preferentially radiosensitized BP protons compared to x-rays or ENT protons in CRC but not in normal tissue based on weight loss and histopathological evaluation. Differential tumor efficacy and normal tissue toxicity after x-ray, entrance and Bragg Peak Protons +/- ATM inhibitor. A B C D E F G H I J DMSO 1 1 1 2.9 1.5 8764 96.4 10 0.3 0.2 ATMi 0.873 0.842 0.723 8.2 3.0 16300 98.5 5.8 0.7 0.8 x-ray 0.615 0.751 0.109 82.4 6.2 4.8 1.0 x-ray+ATMi 0.123 0.344 0.011 80.0 14.4 5.2 1.5 ENT protons 0.293 0.515 0.080 10.2 5.8 10429 78.5 6 2.9 1.5 ENT+ATMi 0.091 0.066 0.013 15.1 7.2 12274 73.0 23.8 5.2 3.8 BP protons 0.213 0.340 0.032 12.0 12.6 7192 75.6 24.6 4.1 3.7 BP+ATMi 0.074 0.038 0.004 22.7 16.2 43677 73.6

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
Mayo Clinic (US), WinnMed (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.