Comparative analysis of racial disparities in social determinants of health among patients with GI cancer in the All of Us dataset.

804 Background: Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) are key factors in understanding disparities in cancer treatment and outcomes. Examining SDoH across racial and ethnic groups helps uncover the mechanisms behind disparities and identify solutions. This study compared SDoH factors between White (non-Hispanic) and Non-White (Asian, African American, Hispanic) patients diagnosed with Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers using a national dataset. Methods: We analyzed data from the All of Us Research Program. Adult patients with GI cancers, identified via ICD-10 and SNOMED codes, who had completed the SoDH surveys were included. Comparative analyses were performed between White and Non-White participants across SDoH constructs, including social/community construct, neighborhood environment, economic stability, and healthcare access using Chi-squared, T-test, and Mann-Whitney U tests as appropriate. Results: Of the 6,620 GI cancer patients identified, 1,831 completed the SDoH survey, of which 13.9% were Non-White. The most common cancers were colon and liver, with pancreatic, stomach, rectal, esophageal, and biliary tract cancers also included. White participants were older than Non-White participants (71.0 vs. 64.2 years, SD = 10.7 and 11.4) and reported higher levels of social cohesion (Mean (SD) = 3.92 (0.70) vs. 3.64 (0.76), p < 0.001) and social support (Mean (SD) = 3.92 (1.00) vs. 3.68 (1.11), p < 0.001). Non-White participants experienced greater perceived discrimination (Mean (SD) = 1.73 (0.80) vs. 1.54 (0.57), p = 0.016) and reported more neighborhood physical disorder (p < 0.001). Food insecurity (23.6% vs. 5.8%, p < 0.001) and housing quality issues (41.8% vs. 21.8%, p < 0.001) were more common among Non-White participants, who also faced more delayed medical care (45.9% vs. 32.5%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study highlights racial disparities in SDoH among GI cancer patients. Non-White participants experienced greater economic instability and neighborhood disorder compared to White participants. The All of Us dataset offers valuable data for examining SDoH in this population, though it may not fully represent the broader US population. As the dataset expands, it will provide more opportunities for comparative analyses among cancer patients across racial and demographic groups. Construct White Non-Hispanic (n = 1489) Non-White (n = 255) P-Value Gender: Female, n (%) 827 (55.5) 167 (65.5) p = 0.010 Social Disorder; mean (SD) 2.10 (0.22) 2.17 (0.28) p = 0.002 Perceived Stress; mean (SD) 11.36 (7.12) 12.85 (7.99) p = 0.003 Global Physical Health T-score (SD) 37.16 (1.89) 36.26 (2.08) p < 0.001 Global Mental Health T-score (SD) 38.30 (1.76) 38.22 (1.86) p = 0.520 Food Insecurity; n (%) 170 (5.8) 117 (23.6) p < 0.001 Poor Housing Quality; n (%) 326 (21.8) 127 (41.8) p < 0.001 Delayed Medical Care; n (%) 484 (32.5) 117 (45.9) p < 0.001 Cannot afford specialist; n (%) 47 (4.2) 20 (11.9) p < 0.001

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.804
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of racial disparities in social determinants of health among patients with GI cancer in the All of Us dataset.

Noelle K. LoConte, Syed Nabeel Zafar, Nicci Owusu‐Brackett, Lily Stalter et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Comparative analysis of racial disparities in social determinants of health among patients with GI cancer in the All of Us dataset.

Noelle K. LoConte, Syed Nabeel Zafar, Nicci Owusu‐Brackett, Lily Stalter, Manasa Venkatesh, Sheriff M Issaka, Muhammad Maisam Ali, Manar Z Al Rubaye
article en

Abstract

804 Background: Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) are key factors in understanding disparities in cancer treatment and outcomes. Examining SDoH across racial and ethnic groups helps uncover the mechanisms behind disparities and identify solutions. This study compared SDoH factors between White (non-Hispanic) and Non-White (Asian, African American, Hispanic) patients diagnosed with Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers using a national dataset. Methods: We analyzed data from the All of Us Research Program. Adult patients with GI cancers, identified via ICD-10 and SNOMED codes, who had completed the SoDH surveys were included. Comparative analyses were performed between White and Non-White participants across SDoH constructs, including social/community construct, neighborhood environment, economic stability, and healthcare access using Chi-squared, T-test, and Mann-Whitney U tests as appropriate. Results: Of the 6,620 GI cancer patients identified, 1,831 completed the SDoH survey, of which 13.9% were Non-White. The most common cancers were colon and liver, with pancreatic, stomach, rectal, esophageal, and biliary tract cancers also included. White participants were older than Non-White participants (71.0 vs. 64.2 years, SD = 10.7 and 11.4) and reported higher levels of social cohesion (Mean (SD) = 3.92 (0.70) vs. 3.64 (0.76), p < 0.001) and social support (Mean (SD) = 3.92 (1.00) vs. 3.68 (1.11), p < 0.001). Non-White participants experienced greater perceived discrimination (Mean (SD) = 1.73 (0.80) vs. 1.54 (0.57), p = 0.016) and reported more neighborhood physical disorder (p < 0.001). Food insecurity (23.6% vs. 5.8%, p < 0.001) and housing quality issues (41.8% vs. 21.8%, p < 0.001) were more common among Non-White participants, who also faced more delayed medical care (45.9% vs. 32.5%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study highlights racial disparities in SDoH among GI cancer patients. Non-White participants experienced greater economic instability and neighborhood disorder compared to White participants. The All of Us dataset offers valuable data for examining SDoH in this population, though it may not fully represent the broader US population. As the dataset expands, it will provide more opportunities for comparative analyses among cancer patients across racial and demographic groups. Construct White Non-Hispanic (n = 1489) Non-White (n = 255) P-Value Gender: Female, n (%) 827 (55.5) 167 (65.5) p = 0.010 Social Disorder; mean (SD) 2.10 (0.22) 2.17 (0.28) p = 0.002 Perceived Stress; mean (SD) 11.36 (7.12) 12.85 (7.99) p = 0.003 Global Physical Health T-score (SD) 37.16 (1.89) 36.26 (2.08) p < 0.001 Global Mental Health T-score (SD) 38.30 (1.76) 38.22 (1.86) p = 0.520 Food Insecurity; n (%) 170 (5.8) 117 (23.6) p < 0.001 Poor Housing Quality; n (%) 326 (21.8) 127 (41.8) p < 0.001 Delayed Medical Care; n (%) 484 (32.5) 117 (45.9) p < 0.001 Cannot afford specialist; n (%) 47 (4.2) 20 (11.9) p < 0.001

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.