Incidence of mediastinal lymph node positivity in patients undergoing robotic transthoracic esophagectomy.

379 Background: Esophageal cancer is increasing in incidence worldwide. Robotic approaches have quickly become mainstream due to the improved visualization and possible increase in nodal harvest. There remains significant debate on the utility of mediastinal lymph node dissection in esophageal cancer patients. We sought to analyze the incidence of mediastinal lymph node positivity and to evaluate its impact on survival in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing robotic assisted trans-thoracic esophagectomy (RATE). Methods: Utilizing a prospectively maintained esophageal database, we identified patients who were diagnosed with EC and underwent RATE between 2009-2024. We then identified patients with positive lymph nodes and stratified by location (celiac or mediastinal). Baseline univariate comparisons were made for continuous variables using both the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis tests. Pearson’s Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. Survival analysis was performed via Kaplain-Meier method. Results: We identified 201 patients who underwent RATE with a median age of 70 (41-91). There were 160 (79.6%) males and 41 (20.4%) females. The mean BMI was 26.5 ± 5.5 and mean ASA score was 3.1 ± 0.6. Adenocarcinoma was the predominate histology at 162(80.6%). Locally advanced T3/T4 tumors were identified in 53 (26.4%) patients and 63(31.3%) had clinical node + disease. Neoadjuvant therapy was utilized in 159(79.1%) patients. The median lymph nodes resected 18 (14 – 22), and length of hospitalization 8 (7 – 11) days. The 30 and 90-day mortality were 2.2% and 2.6% respectively. R0 resections was performed in 200 (99.5%) of patients and the pathologic complete response rates were 42.1%. The incidence of mediastinal lymph node positivewas 6.3% vs 76.3% abdominal. There were 17.6% of patients that had both mediastinal and abdominal lymph nodes positive. The median survival was 23 months for abdominal LN+, 19.5 months for mediastinal LN+ p=0.23. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, neoadjuvant radiation, nodal positivity were predictors of survival. Conclusions: The incidence of mediastinal positive lymph nodes are much higher than previously reported. Perhaps the improved visualization and manipulation of tissue with robotic approaches have enhanced our ability to resect these nodes. Mediastinal lymph node positivity is a poor prognostic factor for survival in patients undergoing robotic esophagectomy. Given these findings, we would continue to support aggressive nodal resection in patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.379
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incidence of mediastinal lymph node positivity in patients undergoing robotic transthoracic esophagectomy.

Jamie Huston, Ravi Shridhar, Kenneth Meredith
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Incidence of mediastinal lymph node positivity in patients undergoing robotic transthoracic esophagectomy.

Jamie Huston, Ravi Shridhar, Kenneth Meredith
article en

Abstract

379 Background: Esophageal cancer is increasing in incidence worldwide. Robotic approaches have quickly become mainstream due to the improved visualization and possible increase in nodal harvest. There remains significant debate on the utility of mediastinal lymph node dissection in esophageal cancer patients. We sought to analyze the incidence of mediastinal lymph node positivity and to evaluate its impact on survival in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing robotic assisted trans-thoracic esophagectomy (RATE). Methods: Utilizing a prospectively maintained esophageal database, we identified patients who were diagnosed with EC and underwent RATE between 2009-2024. We then identified patients with positive lymph nodes and stratified by location (celiac or mediastinal). Baseline univariate comparisons were made for continuous variables using both the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis tests. Pearson’s Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. Survival analysis was performed via Kaplain-Meier method. Results: We identified 201 patients who underwent RATE with a median age of 70 (41-91). There were 160 (79.6%) males and 41 (20.4%) females. The mean BMI was 26.5 ± 5.5 and mean ASA score was 3.1 ± 0.6. Adenocarcinoma was the predominate histology at 162(80.6%). Locally advanced T3/T4 tumors were identified in 53 (26.4%) patients and 63(31.3%) had clinical node + disease. Neoadjuvant therapy was utilized in 159(79.1%) patients. The median lymph nodes resected 18 (14 – 22), and length of hospitalization 8 (7 – 11) days. The 30 and 90-day mortality were 2.2% and 2.6% respectively. R0 resections was performed in 200 (99.5%) of patients and the pathologic complete response rates were 42.1%. The incidence of mediastinal lymph node positivewas 6.3% vs 76.3% abdominal. There were 17.6% of patients that had both mediastinal and abdominal lymph nodes positive. The median survival was 23 months for abdominal LN+, 19.5 months for mediastinal LN+ p=0.23. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, neoadjuvant radiation, nodal positivity were predictors of survival. Conclusions: The incidence of mediastinal positive lymph nodes are much higher than previously reported. Perhaps the improved visualization and manipulation of tissue with robotic approaches have enhanced our ability to resect these nodes. Mediastinal lymph node positivity is a poor prognostic factor for survival in patients undergoing robotic esophagectomy. Given these findings, we would continue to support aggressive nodal resection in patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
Florida State University (US), Florida Hospital Cancer Institute (US), Sarasota Memorial Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.