Retreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for patients with advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective, real-world study.

343 Background: Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has become the standard first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer and is recommended by multiple guidelines and consensuses. After the first line immunotherapy, there is still controversy over whether immune inhibitors can continue to be used across lines after progression. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective, observational, real-world study. We collected clinical information of patients with advanced gastric cancer hospitalized at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2018 to July 2024. All patients received combination therapy with ICIs inhibitors for at least 2 cycles in the first-line and at least 2 cycles of ICI inhibitor-based therapy in the second-line after first-line progression. The efficacy and safety of treatment were evaluated, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), the progression pattern of retreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor, grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Cox regression model was used to investigate the influence of multiple factors on survival. Results: We included 217 patients with a median age of 59.0 (18-84) years, of which 70.0% were male. The median OS and PFS were 9.8 (95% CI 8.8-10.8) months and 4.6 (95% CI 4.0-5.3) months. The ORR and DCR were 22.7% (95% CI 17.1-29.0) and 56.2% (95% CI 49.0-63.1). For the second-line treatment regimens, there were 87 (40.1%) patients and 130 (59.9%) patients received immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (I+C) and immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic drugs(I+C+A) respectively. The median OS was 9.3 (95% CI 8.5-10.1) months and 11.5 (95% CI 9.3-13.7) months, p=0.032. The median PFS was 4.2 (95% CI 3.1-5.3) months and 5.2 (95% CI 4.3-6.1) months, p=0.082. Cox regression model analysis showed that ECOG 0-1, PFS≥6 months in the first-line treatment, second-line regimen (I+C+A), and second-line medication &gt; 3 cycles were independent prognostic factors for OS in the second-line treatment. The incidence of grade ≥3 TRAEs was 20.7%, and the incidence of irAEs was 6.5%. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: This real-world study results showed that retreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors had promising clinical benefit for patients with advanced gastric cancer and manageable safety. Efficacy of different groups. n mOS(m) mPFS(m) ORR(%) DCR(%) ITT 217 9.8 4.6 22.7 56.2 ECOG 0-1 180 9.8 4.7 19.5 56.8 2 37 8.6 4.0 38.2 52.9 1-Line PFS <3m 61 5.5 2.2 1.7 17.2 ≥3m 156 11.7 6.0 31.0 71.7 <6m 136 7.4 3.2 2.4 38.7 ≥6m 81 15.1 8.0 54.4 83.5 Second-line treatment I+C 87 9.3 4.2 16.9 54.2 <jats:

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.343
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Retreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for patients with advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective, real-world study.

Huiqiong Han, Yaping Gao, Yanru Qin, Yongxu Jia et al.
3 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
4.56
article

Retreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for patients with advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective, real-world study.

Huiqiong Han, Yaping Gao, Yanru Qin, Yongxu Jia, Yihan Liu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

343 Background: Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has become the standard first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer and is recommended by multiple guidelines and consensuses. After the first line immunotherapy, there is still controversy over whether immune inhibitors can continue to be used across lines after progression. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective, observational, real-world study. We collected clinical information of patients with advanced gastric cancer hospitalized at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2018 to July 2024. All patients received combination therapy with ICIs inhibitors for at least 2 cycles in the first-line and at least 2 cycles of ICI inhibitor-based therapy in the second-line after first-line progression. The efficacy and safety of treatment were evaluated, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), the progression pattern of retreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor, grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Cox regression model was used to investigate the influence of multiple factors on survival. Results: We included 217 patients with a median age of 59.0 (18-84) years, of which 70.0% were male. The median OS and PFS were 9.8 (95% CI 8.8-10.8) months and 4.6 (95% CI 4.0-5.3) months. The ORR and DCR were 22.7% (95% CI 17.1-29.0) and 56.2% (95% CI 49.0-63.1). For the second-line treatment regimens, there were 87 (40.1%) patients and 130 (59.9%) patients received immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (I+C) and immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic drugs(I+C+A) respectively. The median OS was 9.3 (95% CI 8.5-10.1) months and 11.5 (95% CI 9.3-13.7) months, p=0.032. The median PFS was 4.2 (95% CI 3.1-5.3) months and 5.2 (95% CI 4.3-6.1) months, p=0.082. Cox regression model analysis showed that ECOG 0-1, PFS≥6 months in the first-line treatment, second-line regimen (I+C+A), and second-line medication &gt; 3 cycles were independent prognostic factors for OS in the second-line treatment. The incidence of grade ≥3 TRAEs was 20.7%, and the incidence of irAEs was 6.5%. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: This real-world study results showed that retreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors had promising clinical benefit for patients with advanced gastric cancer and manageable safety. Efficacy of different groups. n mOS(m) mPFS(m) ORR(%) DCR(%) ITT 217 9.8 4.6 22.7 56.2 ECOG 0-1 180 9.8 4.7 19.5 56.8 2 37 8.6 4.0 38.2 52.9 1-Line PFS <3m 61 5.5 2.2 1.7 17.2 ≥3m 156 11.7 6.0 31.0 71.7 <6m 136 7.4 3.2 2.4 38.7 ≥6m 81 15.1 8.0 54.4 83.5 Second-line treatment I+C 87 9.3 4.2 16.9 54.2 <jats:

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
Zhengzhou University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
4.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.