Predictive factors for the efficacy of nal-IRI + 5FU/LV therapy in patients previously treated with conventional irinotecan.

737 Background: There were some reports that nal-IRI + 5FU/LV (NAPOLI) therapy was effective for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer who had a history of treatment containing conventional irinotecan (IRI) though the others did not. We aimed to investigate the factors that contribute to the effectiveness of NAPOLI therapy for patients who have already received IRI-containing treatment. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled the consecutive patients who had previously treated with IRI-containing treatment and started NAPOLI therapy at our hospital between June 2020 and December 2022. We compared the patient backgrounds of patients who achieved CR, PR, or SD according to RECISTv1.1 (effective group) and those who did not (ineffective group). Continuous variables were divided into two groups by the median of the entire population, and factors contributing to the effectiveness of NAPOLI therapy were determined by logistic regression analysis. Results: The subjective were 52 patients. The reason for discontinuation of IRI-containing treatment was refractory and intolerant in 45 and 7 patients, respectively. The median age was 65 years. Twenty-three patients (44%) had ECOG PS of 0, and 41 patients (79%) had metastatic disease. The median albumin, CRP, CEA and CA 19-9 was 3.8 g/dL, 0.3 mg/dL, 8.5 ng/mL and 2082 U/mL, respectively. Twenty-one patients (40%) showed SD and they were allocated in the effective group whereas 31 patients were in the ineffective group. Of the 21 patients in the Effective Group, 16 patients(76%) were refractory, while of the 31 patients in the Ineffective Group, 29 patients (94%) were refractory. The factors contributing to disease control were PS of 0 (odds ratio, 5.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.34–25.0), CA 19-9 <1000 U/mL (odds ratio, 5.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.26–24.3), and Alb >3.8 g/dL (odds ratio, 5.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.14–23.7). Age, sex, disease stage, serum level of CRP, and CEA did not affect the effectiveness of NAPOLI therapy. Conclusions: Even in patients who have already received IRI treatment, the NAPOLI regimen is expected to be effective in patients with PS of 0, Alb >3.8 g/dL, and CA 19-9 <1000 U/mL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.737
Primary Topic
Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive factors for the efficacy of nal-IRI + 5FU/LV therapy in patients previously treated with conventional irinotecan.

Masahide Enomoto, Taito Fukushima, Kensuke Shiraishi, Yuichiro Tozuka et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
article

Predictive factors for the efficacy of nal-IRI + 5FU/LV therapy in patients previously treated with conventional irinotecan.

Masahide Enomoto, Taito Fukushima, Kensuke Shiraishi, Yuichiro Tozuka, Junji Furuse, Tomomi Hamaguchi, Yasutsugu Asai, Shun Tezuka, Satoshi Kobayashi, Makoto Ueno
article en

Abstract

737 Background: There were some reports that nal-IRI + 5FU/LV (NAPOLI) therapy was effective for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer who had a history of treatment containing conventional irinotecan (IRI) though the others did not. We aimed to investigate the factors that contribute to the effectiveness of NAPOLI therapy for patients who have already received IRI-containing treatment. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled the consecutive patients who had previously treated with IRI-containing treatment and started NAPOLI therapy at our hospital between June 2020 and December 2022. We compared the patient backgrounds of patients who achieved CR, PR, or SD according to RECISTv1.1 (effective group) and those who did not (ineffective group). Continuous variables were divided into two groups by the median of the entire population, and factors contributing to the effectiveness of NAPOLI therapy were determined by logistic regression analysis. Results: The subjective were 52 patients. The reason for discontinuation of IRI-containing treatment was refractory and intolerant in 45 and 7 patients, respectively. The median age was 65 years. Twenty-three patients (44%) had ECOG PS of 0, and 41 patients (79%) had metastatic disease. The median albumin, CRP, CEA and CA 19-9 was 3.8 g/dL, 0.3 mg/dL, 8.5 ng/mL and 2082 U/mL, respectively. Twenty-one patients (40%) showed SD and they were allocated in the effective group whereas 31 patients were in the ineffective group. Of the 21 patients in the Effective Group, 16 patients(76%) were refractory, while of the 31 patients in the Ineffective Group, 29 patients (94%) were refractory. The factors contributing to disease control were PS of 0 (odds ratio, 5.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.34–25.0), CA 19-9 <1000 U/mL (odds ratio, 5.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.26–24.3), and Alb >3.8 g/dL (odds ratio, 5.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.14–23.7). Age, sex, disease stage, serum level of CRP, and CEA did not affect the effectiveness of NAPOLI therapy. Conclusions: Even in patients who have already received IRI treatment, the NAPOLI regimen is expected to be effective in patients with PS of 0, Alb >3.8 g/dL, and CA 19-9 <1000 U/mL.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
Kanagawa Prefectural Hospital Organization (JP), Kanagawa Cancer Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.