Real-world clinical outcomes of locally advanced unresectable and de-novo metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study from Saudi Arabia.

691 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has dismal clinical outcomes, even with existing treatment regimens. This study evaluates the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with locally advanced unresectable or de-novo metastatic PDAC in Saudi Arabia to provide real-world data that can be compared to international benchmarks. Methods: This is a retrospective, multicenter study. Patients diagnosed with unresectable locally advanced or de-novo metastatic PDAC between January 2015 and November 2023 were included. Data were collected from 10 oncology centers across Saudi Arabia. Patient characteristics, treatment regimens, and clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: A total of 350 patients were identified, with a median age of 60 years at time of diagnosis, 63% of patients presenting with multiple metastatic sites, primarily in the liver (66.3%). Among patients tested, 7.1% had deficient mismatch repair (d-MMR), and 5.8% harbored BRCA mutations. FOLFIRINOX was the most common first-line treatment (55.1%), followed by gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (15.1%). The median PFS for first-line treatment was 5.3 months, with FOLFIRINOX achieving the longest PFS (6.5 months). The median OS was 10.34 months for the entire cohort, with better survival outcomes observed in patients receiving FOLFIRINOX (12.3 months). Independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS included performance status, type of first-line regimen, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Conclusions: This real-world study confirms that clinical outcomes for locally advanced unresectable and metastatic PDAC in Saudi Arabia are consistent with international data, with trend of FOLFIRINOX showing superior outcomes over gemcitabine-based regimens. However, both treatments reflect the persistent poor prognosis of PDAC, underscoring the need for novel therapeutic strategies. Further research is warranted to optimize treatment selection and improve survival outcomes in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.691
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world clinical outcomes of locally advanced unresectable and de-novo metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study from Saudi Arabia.

Mohamed Aseafan, Shouki Bazarbashi, Ali Al-Fakeeh, Emad Tashkandi et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Real-world clinical outcomes of locally advanced unresectable and de-novo metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study from Saudi Arabia.

Mohamed Aseafan, Shouki Bazarbashi, Ali Al-Fakeeh, Emad Tashkandi, Kanan Alshammari, Marwan Al‐Hajeili, Ali Alqahtani, Mervat Mahrous, Safwan Bakhsh, Bader Alshamsan, Mohamed Alghamdi
article en

Abstract

691 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has dismal clinical outcomes, even with existing treatment regimens. This study evaluates the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with locally advanced unresectable or de-novo metastatic PDAC in Saudi Arabia to provide real-world data that can be compared to international benchmarks. Methods: This is a retrospective, multicenter study. Patients diagnosed with unresectable locally advanced or de-novo metastatic PDAC between January 2015 and November 2023 were included. Data were collected from 10 oncology centers across Saudi Arabia. Patient characteristics, treatment regimens, and clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: A total of 350 patients were identified, with a median age of 60 years at time of diagnosis, 63% of patients presenting with multiple metastatic sites, primarily in the liver (66.3%). Among patients tested, 7.1% had deficient mismatch repair (d-MMR), and 5.8% harbored BRCA mutations. FOLFIRINOX was the most common first-line treatment (55.1%), followed by gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (15.1%). The median PFS for first-line treatment was 5.3 months, with FOLFIRINOX achieving the longest PFS (6.5 months). The median OS was 10.34 months for the entire cohort, with better survival outcomes observed in patients receiving FOLFIRINOX (12.3 months). Independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS included performance status, type of first-line regimen, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Conclusions: This real-world study confirms that clinical outcomes for locally advanced unresectable and metastatic PDAC in Saudi Arabia are consistent with international data, with trend of FOLFIRINOX showing superior outcomes over gemcitabine-based regimens. However, both treatments reflect the persistent poor prognosis of PDAC, underscoring the need for novel therapeutic strategies. Further research is warranted to optimize treatment selection and improve survival outcomes in this population.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
Riyadh Armed Forces Hospital (SA), King Abdulaziz University (SA), Umm al-Qura University (SA), King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (SA), King Saud Medical City (SA), King Fahd Medical City (SA), King Saud University (SA), King Fahad Specialist Hospital (SA), Security Forces Hospital (SA), King Abdullah Medical City (SA), National Guard Health Affairs (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.