A protocol for pretreatment testing for antibodies to galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose to mitigate the risk of cetuximab hypersensitivity reactions.

115 Background: Cetuximab has been shown to improve survival in patients with KRAS wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer. However, high rates of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) limit its use, with HSR rates up to 10-20%. A major driver of cetuximab HSR is from pre-formed antibody response to galactose-1,3-alpha-galactose (alpha-gal). Evidence from retrospective studies supports alpha-gal pre-screening in this setting. We are the first to report on the impact of prospective alpha-gal antibody screening on cetuximab HSR. Methods: Records were reviewed across three medical oncology centres that have adopted alpha-gal antibody screening measures. Data for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab were retrieved. All centres assessed alpha-gal antibody status using the ImmunoCAP ELISA assay. Due to lack of a shared screening approach across study sites, a pre-determined protocol was retrospectively applied to all cases. This protocol allowed cetuximab administration if alpha-gal levels were ≤0.1 kUA/L, but prohibited it if alpha-gal levels were >0.1 kUA/L in favour of panitumumab administration. Patients were allocated to either the Protocol Applied or Protocol Not Applied cohorts based on protocol requirements being met. The primary outcome between these patient groups was the incidence of cetuximab HSRs. Results: Of 254 assessable patients, 39 underwent the pre-treatment screening protocol. Of the Protocol Applied group, 3% (n=1/38) experienced a cetuximab HSR compared to 16% (n=35/215) in the Protocol Not Applied group (Odds ratio (OR) 7.16; 95% CI 1.13–299.61, p =0.02). Patients with alpha-gal antibody titres >0.1 kUA/L were more likely to experience a cetuximab HSR (OR 69.71; 95% CI 5.18–4296.81, p =0.0001). Conclusions: Pre-treatment screening for alpha-gal antibodies significantly reduces the incidence of cetuximab HSRs. A testing threshold of 0.1 kUA/L is effective in identifying patients at risk. Implementing this protocol can improve the safety of cetuximab therapy in high-risk populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.115
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A protocol for pretreatment testing for antibodies to galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose to mitigate the risk of cetuximab hypersensitivity reactions.

CC Mok, Madhawa De Silva, Joe Wei, David Lok Hang Chan et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
1.62
article

A protocol for pretreatment testing for antibodies to galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose to mitigate the risk of cetuximab hypersensitivity reactions.

CC Mok, Madhawa De Silva, Joe Wei, David Lok Hang Chan, Sheryl van Nunen, Connie I. Diakos, Alexander Yuile, Gavin M. Marx, Samuel Miller, Stephen John Clarke, Thomas Skinner, Nick Pavlakis, Meredith Oatley, Nicholas Della Marta
article en
1 citations

Abstract

115 Background: Cetuximab has been shown to improve survival in patients with KRAS wildtype metastatic colorectal cancer. However, high rates of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) limit its use, with HSR rates up to 10-20%. A major driver of cetuximab HSR is from pre-formed antibody response to galactose-1,3-alpha-galactose (alpha-gal). Evidence from retrospective studies supports alpha-gal pre-screening in this setting. We are the first to report on the impact of prospective alpha-gal antibody screening on cetuximab HSR. Methods: Records were reviewed across three medical oncology centres that have adopted alpha-gal antibody screening measures. Data for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab were retrieved. All centres assessed alpha-gal antibody status using the ImmunoCAP ELISA assay. Due to lack of a shared screening approach across study sites, a pre-determined protocol was retrospectively applied to all cases. This protocol allowed cetuximab administration if alpha-gal levels were ≤0.1 kUA/L, but prohibited it if alpha-gal levels were >0.1 kUA/L in favour of panitumumab administration. Patients were allocated to either the Protocol Applied or Protocol Not Applied cohorts based on protocol requirements being met. The primary outcome between these patient groups was the incidence of cetuximab HSRs. Results: Of 254 assessable patients, 39 underwent the pre-treatment screening protocol. Of the Protocol Applied group, 3% (n=1/38) experienced a cetuximab HSR compared to 16% (n=35/215) in the Protocol Not Applied group (Odds ratio (OR) 7.16; 95% CI 1.13–299.61, p =0.02). Patients with alpha-gal antibody titres >0.1 kUA/L were more likely to experience a cetuximab HSR (OR 69.71; 95% CI 5.18–4296.81, p =0.0001). Conclusions: Pre-treatment screening for alpha-gal antibodies significantly reduces the incidence of cetuximab HSRs. A testing threshold of 0.1 kUA/L is effective in identifying patients at risk. Implementing this protocol can improve the safety of cetuximab therapy in high-risk populations.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
The University of Sydney (AU), Sydney Adventist Hospital (AU), Royal North Shore Hospital (AU), Northern Sydney Local Health District (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
1.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.