Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (N+I) in patients (pts) with pancreatic cancer (PC) with <i>BRCA1/2</i> mutation (mut): Results from the Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) study.

715 Background: TAPUR is a phase II basket study evaluating antitumor activity of commercially available targeted agents in pts with advanced cancers with genomic alterations. Results from a cohort of pts with PC with BRCA1/2 mut treated with N+I are reported. Methods: Eligible pts had measurable disease, ECOG performance status (PS) 0-2, adequate organ function, and no standard treatment (tx) options or prior immune checkpoint inhibitor tx. PD-L1 expression testing was not required. Genomic testing was performed in CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited site-selected labs. Most genomic tests did not distinguish between germline or somatic mut. Pts received I at 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks (wks) for 4 doses with N at 1 mg/kg IV every 3 wks for 4 doses. N alone was then continued at 240 mg every 2 wks or 480 mg every 4 wks until disease progression. Primary endpoint was disease control (DC) per investigator defined as complete (CR) or partial (PR) response per RECIST v. 1.1, or stable disease of at least 16 wks duration (SD16+). CR is based on radiographic assessment. CA 19-9 levels were not collected. Simon 2-stage design tested null DC rate of 15% vs. 35% (power = 0.85; α = 0.10). If ≥2 of 10 pts in stage 1 have DC, 18 more pts are enrolled; otherwise, the cohort is closed. If ≥7 of 28 pts have DC, the null DC rate is rejected. Secondary endpoints were objective response (OR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR) and SD, and safety. DOR is defined as time from pt’s first documented OR to progressive disease. Results: 32 pts with PC with BRCA1 (n=8), BRCA2 (n=22) or both BRCA1/2 (n=2) were enrolled between October 2017 and March 2023. 4 pts were not evaluable for efficacy. Pts had adenocarcinoma (n=29), acinar cell carcinoma (n=2), and poorly differentiated carcinoma (n=1). Table shows demographics and outcomes. 1 CR, 3 PR and 4 SD16+ were observed for a DC rate of 31% (90% CI, 18 to 100) and OR rate of 14% (95% CI, 4 to 33). The pt with CR had a BRCA1 mut, the pts with PR had BRCA1 (n=1) and BRCA2 (n=2) muts, and the pts with SD16+ had BRCA1 (n=2) and BRCA2 (n=2) muts. The null DC rate was rejected (p=0.04). The pt with CR remains on tx with a DOR of 311 wks as of May 2024. 15 pts received prior tx with olaparib and 1 of those pts had SD16+ on this study. 17 pts had ≥1 drug-related grade 3-4 adverse event (AE) or serious AE. All were consistent with N+I labels except generalized muscle weakness and lymphopenia. Conclusions: N+I shows antitumor activity in pts with PC with BRCA1/2 mut and warrants further study. Clinical trial information: NCT02693535 . Demographics (N=32) and efficacy outcomes (n=28). Median (Med) age, years (range) 66 (37-80) ECOG PS, % 0-12 31 (97)1 (3) Prior systemic regimens, % 0-2≥3 10 (31)22 (69) DC rate, % (OR and SD16+) (90% CI) 31 (18, 100) OR rate, % (95% CI) 14 (4, 33) Med PFS, wks (95% CI) 9 (7, 16) Med OS, wks (95% CI) 34 (14, 46)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.715
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (N+I) in patients (pts) with pancreatic cancer (PC) with BRCA1/2 mutation (mut): Results from the Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) study.

Evthokia Hobbs, Ari David Baron, Kelsey A. Klute, Kathryn F. Mileham et al.
3 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
3.14
article

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (N+I) in patients (pts) with pancreatic cancer (PC) with BRCA1/2 mutation (mut): Results from the Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) study.

Evthokia Hobbs, Ari David Baron, Kelsey A. Klute, Kathryn F. Mileham, Elizabeth Garrett‐Mayer, Richard L. Schilsky, Philip J. Gold, Sachdev Thomas, Matthew Tinguely, Marina Frimer, Sherise C. Rogers, Timothy Lewis Cannon, Susan Halabi, Peter J. Hosein, Davendra Sohal, Evan Pisick, Vaibhav Sahai, Jerome D. Winegarden, Michael Rothe, Abby Gregory
article en
3 citations

Abstract

715 Background: TAPUR is a phase II basket study evaluating antitumor activity of commercially available targeted agents in pts with advanced cancers with genomic alterations. Results from a cohort of pts with PC with BRCA1/2 mut treated with N+I are reported. Methods: Eligible pts had measurable disease, ECOG performance status (PS) 0-2, adequate organ function, and no standard treatment (tx) options or prior immune checkpoint inhibitor tx. PD-L1 expression testing was not required. Genomic testing was performed in CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited site-selected labs. Most genomic tests did not distinguish between germline or somatic mut. Pts received I at 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks (wks) for 4 doses with N at 1 mg/kg IV every 3 wks for 4 doses. N alone was then continued at 240 mg every 2 wks or 480 mg every 4 wks until disease progression. Primary endpoint was disease control (DC) per investigator defined as complete (CR) or partial (PR) response per RECIST v. 1.1, or stable disease of at least 16 wks duration (SD16+). CR is based on radiographic assessment. CA 19-9 levels were not collected. Simon 2-stage design tested null DC rate of 15% vs. 35% (power = 0.85; α = 0.10). If ≥2 of 10 pts in stage 1 have DC, 18 more pts are enrolled; otherwise, the cohort is closed. If ≥7 of 28 pts have DC, the null DC rate is rejected. Secondary endpoints were objective response (OR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR) and SD, and safety. DOR is defined as time from pt’s first documented OR to progressive disease. Results: 32 pts with PC with BRCA1 (n=8), BRCA2 (n=22) or both BRCA1/2 (n=2) were enrolled between October 2017 and March 2023. 4 pts were not evaluable for efficacy. Pts had adenocarcinoma (n=29), acinar cell carcinoma (n=2), and poorly differentiated carcinoma (n=1). Table shows demographics and outcomes. 1 CR, 3 PR and 4 SD16+ were observed for a DC rate of 31% (90% CI, 18 to 100) and OR rate of 14% (95% CI, 4 to 33). The pt with CR had a BRCA1 mut, the pts with PR had BRCA1 (n=1) and BRCA2 (n=2) muts, and the pts with SD16+ had BRCA1 (n=2) and BRCA2 (n=2) muts. The null DC rate was rejected (p=0.04). The pt with CR remains on tx with a DOR of 311 wks as of May 2024. 15 pts received prior tx with olaparib and 1 of those pts had SD16+ on this study. 17 pts had ≥1 drug-related grade 3-4 adverse event (AE) or serious AE. All were consistent with N+I labels except generalized muscle weakness and lymphopenia. Conclusions: N+I shows antitumor activity in pts with PC with BRCA1/2 mut and warrants further study. Clinical trial information: NCT02693535 . Demographics (N=32) and efficacy outcomes (n=28). Median (Med) age, years (range) 66 (37-80) ECOG PS, % 0-12 31 (97)1 (3) Prior systemic regimens, % 0-2≥3 10 (31)22 (69) DC rate, % (OR and SD16+) (90% CI) 31 (18, 100) OR rate, % (95% CI) 14 (4, 33) Med PFS, wks (95% CI) 9 (7, 16) Med OS, wks (95% CI) 34 (14, 46)

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
Northwell Health (US), Sanford Health (US), American Society of Clinical Oncology (US), University of Miami (US), University of Michigan (US), University of Florida Health (US), Providence Portland Medical Center (US), California Pacific Medical Center (US), Virginia Cancer Institute (US), Levine Cancer Institute (US), City of Hope (US), Michigan Cancer Research Consortium (US), Kaiser Permanente Vallejo Medical Center (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), University of Nebraska Medical Center (US), University of Cincinnati (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
3.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.