Focusing on clinical trial ineligibility: Nivolumab plus chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

355 Background: Nivolumab demonstrates promising efficacy when combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, a large proportion of patients are perceived as ineligible for clinical trials in clinical practice. The aim of this study is to analyze the treatment outcomes and safety among patients deemed ineligible in clinical trials for AGC. Methods: A retrospective examination was conducted involving 187 patients who received treatment for HER2-negative unresectable or recurrent AGC between December 2014 and October 2023 at six institutions. Eleven patients were excluded due to massive ascites or poor performance status (PS). Ineligible patients were defined as meeting any of the seven criteria: age 75 years or over, PS 2, bone marrow dysfunction, hepatic dysfunction, renal dysfunction, serious complications, and extended bone metastasis. Of the 104 patients meeting these criteria, individuals were divided into the ICI group (nivolumab plus chemotherapy) and the non-ICI group (chemotherapy only). A comparative assessment of survival outcomes and tumor responses between the two groups was performed. Additionally, the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAE) in the ICI group was assessed. Results: The ICI group comprised 57 patients, while the non-ICI group comprised 47 patients. The median follow-up for survival analysis was 11.6 months. In the ICI group, response rate (RR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) were 48.7% among patients with measurable lesions, 7.4 months (95%CI, 5.3-10.0), and 15.1 months (95%CI, 13.1-21.0). In the non-ICI group, RR, mPFS, and mOS were 33.3%, 6.4 months (95%CI, 4.1-7.8), and 11.8 months (95%CI, 10.1-14.6). The OS in the ICI group was significantly better than those in the non-ICI group (log-rank p = 0.0436). Furthermore, irAEs were observed in eight patients (14.0%), including hypothyroidism (n=3), arthritis (n=2), hypopituitarism (n=2), and dermatitis (n=1). No patients discontinued treatment due to intolerable irAEs. Conclusions: The combination of nivolumab and chemotherapy showed a favorable outcome even in AGC patients with ineligible group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.355
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Focusing on clinical trial ineligibility: Nivolumab plus chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Kohei Ogawa, Yurika Nakayama, Hiroaki Takagi, Ichiro Yasuda et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Focusing on clinical trial ineligibility: Nivolumab plus chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Kohei Ogawa, Yurika Nakayama, Hiroaki Takagi, Ichiro Yasuda, Kazuhisa Tabata, Iori Motoo, Shinya Kajiura, Takayuki Ando, Yuno Ohya, Hotaka Tamura, Ayumu Hosokawa, Yuko Ueda, Kenichiro Tsukada
article en

Abstract

355 Background: Nivolumab demonstrates promising efficacy when combined with chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, a large proportion of patients are perceived as ineligible for clinical trials in clinical practice. The aim of this study is to analyze the treatment outcomes and safety among patients deemed ineligible in clinical trials for AGC. Methods: A retrospective examination was conducted involving 187 patients who received treatment for HER2-negative unresectable or recurrent AGC between December 2014 and October 2023 at six institutions. Eleven patients were excluded due to massive ascites or poor performance status (PS). Ineligible patients were defined as meeting any of the seven criteria: age 75 years or over, PS 2, bone marrow dysfunction, hepatic dysfunction, renal dysfunction, serious complications, and extended bone metastasis. Of the 104 patients meeting these criteria, individuals were divided into the ICI group (nivolumab plus chemotherapy) and the non-ICI group (chemotherapy only). A comparative assessment of survival outcomes and tumor responses between the two groups was performed. Additionally, the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAE) in the ICI group was assessed. Results: The ICI group comprised 57 patients, while the non-ICI group comprised 47 patients. The median follow-up for survival analysis was 11.6 months. In the ICI group, response rate (RR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) were 48.7% among patients with measurable lesions, 7.4 months (95%CI, 5.3-10.0), and 15.1 months (95%CI, 13.1-21.0). In the non-ICI group, RR, mPFS, and mOS were 33.3%, 6.4 months (95%CI, 4.1-7.8), and 11.8 months (95%CI, 10.1-14.6). The OS in the ICI group was significantly better than those in the non-ICI group (log-rank p = 0.0436). Furthermore, irAEs were observed in eight patients (14.0%), including hypothyroidism (n=3), arthritis (n=2), hypopituitarism (n=2), and dermatitis (n=1). No patients discontinued treatment due to intolerable irAEs. Conclusions: The combination of nivolumab and chemotherapy showed a favorable outcome even in AGC patients with ineligible group.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital (JP), University of Miyazaki Hospital (JP), Kouseiren Takaoka Hospital (JP), University of Toyama (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.