K objasňování pojmu „přímá účast na nepřátelských akcích“

Presented paper is focused on the current ICRCʼs initiative to clarify the notion of “direct participation in hostilities” in international humanitarian law which, with respect to civilians, results in lost of protection against direct attack. Author considers the principle of distinction in international humanitarian law, describes ICRCʼs Interpretative Guidance in its personal, substantive and temporal scope and analyzes its most problematic aspects (concept of civilian in non-international armed conflict, revolving doors mechanism, restraint on the use of force). Despite certain doubts whether ICRCʼs Interpretative Guidance merely reflects current lex lata in the area of international humanitarian law or implies reference framework for future international regulation (status of organized armed groups in non-international armed conflict, restraint on the use of force) author comes to the conclusion, that ICRC's work has to be considered as welcomed step forward which shall for sure influence any following discussion over the topic.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AUC IURIDICA
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2024.43
Primary Topic
Global Socioeconomic and Political Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

K objasňování pojmu „přímá účast na nepřátelských akcích“

Ondřej Svaček
AUC IURIDICA
Global Socioeconomic and Political Dynamics
article

K objasňování pojmu „přímá účast na nepřátelských akcích“

Ondřej Svaček
article en

Abstract

Presented paper is focused on the current ICRCʼs initiative to clarify the notion of “direct participation in hostilities” in international humanitarian law which, with respect to civilians, results in lost of protection against direct attack. Author considers the principle of distinction in international humanitarian law, describes ICRCʼs Interpretative Guidance in its personal, substantive and temporal scope and analyzes its most problematic aspects (concept of civilian in non-international armed conflict, revolving doors mechanism, restraint on the use of force). Despite certain doubts whether ICRCʼs Interpretative Guidance merely reflects current lex lata in the area of international humanitarian law or implies reference framework for future international regulation (status of organized armed groups in non-international armed conflict, restraint on the use of force) author comes to the conclusion, that ICRC's work has to be considered as welcomed step forward which shall for sure influence any following discussion over the topic.

AUC IURIDICAVol. 55(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Global Socioeconomic and Political Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.