Comparative efficacy of TAS-102 and chemotherapy rechallenge in the third-line setting and beyond in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: A retrospective study.

78 Background: The optimal approach to third line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer remains a subject of debate. Options include Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102), TAS-102 with bevacizumab, regorafenib, chemotherapy rechallenge with or without an anti-EGFR agent, or fruquintinib. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of standard of care TAS-102, TAS-102 with bevacizumab, or regorafenib versus chemotherapy rechallenge in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in the third line setting and beyond. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received either TAS-102 with or without bevacizumab, regorafenib or chemotherapy rechallenge with or without an anti-EGFR agent between 2018 and 2023, at the Ministry of National Guard for Health Affairs in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Patients received such agents in the third line setting and beyond. Results: A total of 75 patients were included in this study, with 39 patients receiving TAS-102 with or without bevacizumab, or regorafenib, and 36 receiving chemotherapy rechallenge. The median patient age was 58 years (range 28-81), with the majority being males at 55%. Among the chemotherapy rechallenge group, 31% were treated with cetuximab and 6% had panitumumab rechallenge, some of which were guided by cell free DNA liquid biopsy testing. In the other group, 66% received regorafenib, 26% TAS-102 alone, and 8% TAS-102 with bevacizumab. At the time of analysis, 56% of patients had passed away. Median overall survival for patients who received TAS-102 with our without bevacizumab, and regorafenib in the third line setting was found to be 13.1 months. Whereas for patients who received chemotherapy rechallenge, their median overall survival was 19.5 months. Conclusions: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received chemotherapy rechallenge in the third line setting survived longer compared with patients who received TAS-102 with or without bevacizumab, or regorafenib.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.78
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative efficacy of TAS-102 and chemotherapy rechallenge in the third-line setting and beyond in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: A retrospective study.

Kanan Alshammari, Ahmed Abushara, Rakan B. Alanazi, Razan Alsubaie et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
article

Comparative efficacy of TAS-102 and chemotherapy rechallenge in the third-line setting and beyond in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: A retrospective study.

Kanan Alshammari, Ahmed Abushara, Rakan B. Alanazi, Razan Alsubaie, Husam Shehata, Afrah Alsehali, Fouad Sabatin, Mohammad Alkaiyat, Reem Almesfir, Mohammed Ahmed Algarni, Khalid Alotaibi, Zainab Albahrani, M. M. Ali
article en

Abstract

78 Background: The optimal approach to third line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer remains a subject of debate. Options include Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102), TAS-102 with bevacizumab, regorafenib, chemotherapy rechallenge with or without an anti-EGFR agent, or fruquintinib. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of standard of care TAS-102, TAS-102 with bevacizumab, or regorafenib versus chemotherapy rechallenge in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in the third line setting and beyond. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received either TAS-102 with or without bevacizumab, regorafenib or chemotherapy rechallenge with or without an anti-EGFR agent between 2018 and 2023, at the Ministry of National Guard for Health Affairs in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Patients received such agents in the third line setting and beyond. Results: A total of 75 patients were included in this study, with 39 patients receiving TAS-102 with or without bevacizumab, or regorafenib, and 36 receiving chemotherapy rechallenge. The median patient age was 58 years (range 28-81), with the majority being males at 55%. Among the chemotherapy rechallenge group, 31% were treated with cetuximab and 6% had panitumumab rechallenge, some of which were guided by cell free DNA liquid biopsy testing. In the other group, 66% received regorafenib, 26% TAS-102 alone, and 8% TAS-102 with bevacizumab. At the time of analysis, 56% of patients had passed away. Median overall survival for patients who received TAS-102 with our without bevacizumab, and regorafenib in the third line setting was found to be 13.1 months. Whereas for patients who received chemotherapy rechallenge, their median overall survival was 19.5 months. Conclusions: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received chemotherapy rechallenge in the third line setting survived longer compared with patients who received TAS-102 with or without bevacizumab, or regorafenib.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
King Abdulaziz Medical City (SA), National Guard Health Affairs (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.