Real-world use of supportive medications to prevent and manage key adverse events during first-line (1L) treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) with FOLFIRINOX (FFX), FFX without 5FU bolus, and gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel (GnP).

695 Background: 1L treatment of mPDAC with FFX or GnP typically requires supportive care to alleviate toxic effects. Two of the most common adverse events are neutropenia, which may be treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and diarrhea, often treated with atropine and/or loperamide. Medications may be administered as prophylaxis (PPx) or to manage symptoms as they occur. Other methods to improve tolerability include modifying regimens with lower doses or omitted components, such as removing the 5FU bolus from FFX (FFXnb). This study examines PPx vs non-PPx G-CSF, atropine, and loperamide during 1L treatment with FFX, FFXnb, and GnP. Methods: This retrospective observational study utilized Optum Market Clarity claims + EHR linked data. Inclusion criteria were: adult patients (pts) diagnosed with mPDAC between January 1, 2015 and May 31, 2023; initiated treatment (index date) with 1L FFX, FFXnb, or GnP -14 to +90 days from diagnosis; no evidence of other cancers in 6 months pre-index continuous enrollment; at least one EHR record post-index. G-CSF PPx was defined as administration/fill within 7 days of the start of a treatment, inclusive. PPx with atropine or loperamide was defined as administration/fill the day before or day of a treatment; all other use was categorized “non-PPx”. Pts may appear in both PPx and non-PPx categories. Results: Rates of overall use, PPx, and non-PPx for each medication of interest are shown (Table). The overall G-CSF use rate was >3.5 times higher for FFX and FFXnb vs GnP. While ≥70% of FFX/FFXnb pts received PPx, non-PPx still occurred in more than 1 in 8 pts. One-fifth of FFX and FFXnb pts received atropine at any time, vs. just 6% of GnP pts. Atropine PPx was less common than non-PPx for FFX/FFXnb and was rare in GnP pts. Similar to the other medications, loperamide was observed more for FFX and FFXnb vs. GnP, but was the least common of the medications, used by <10% of pts in any regimen. PPx and non-PPx use were similar. Use of the three medications was similar between FFX and FFXnb. Conclusions: In a RW cohort of 1L mPDAC pts, G-CSF and antidiarrheal use was more common in FFX and FFXnb than GnP pts. Most FFX and FFXnb pts received PPx G-CSF, reflecting clinician efforts to manage the high risk of neutropenia with these regimens. Non-PPx G-CSF still occurred in 14–18% of pts. FFXnb had similar rates of concomitant medications as FFX, indicating that removing the 5FU bolus may have minor impact on the need for some supportive medications. Concomitant medication use. Medication 1L FFX(n=511) 1L FFXnb(n=583) 1L GnP(n=958) G-CSF % treated overall 77% 71% 20% % PPx 76% 70% 17% % non-PPx 18% 14% 9% Atropine % treated overall 20% 20% 6% % PPx 11% 9% 2% % non-PPx 15% 16% 5% Loperamide % treated overall 7% 9% 3% % PPx 4% 5% 1% % non-PPx 4% 6% 2%

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.695
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world use of supportive medications to prevent and manage key adverse events during first-line (1L) treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) with FOLFIRINOX (FFX), FFX without 5FU bolus, and gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel (GnP).

Anna Masek, Syvart Dennen, Ravi Kumar Paluri, Paul Cockrum
1 links
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Real-world use of supportive medications to prevent and manage key adverse events during first-line (1L) treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) with FOLFIRINOX (FFX), FFX without 5FU bolus, and gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel (GnP).

Anna Masek, Syvart Dennen, Ravi Kumar Paluri, Paul Cockrum
article en

Abstract

695 Background: 1L treatment of mPDAC with FFX or GnP typically requires supportive care to alleviate toxic effects. Two of the most common adverse events are neutropenia, which may be treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and diarrhea, often treated with atropine and/or loperamide. Medications may be administered as prophylaxis (PPx) or to manage symptoms as they occur. Other methods to improve tolerability include modifying regimens with lower doses or omitted components, such as removing the 5FU bolus from FFX (FFXnb). This study examines PPx vs non-PPx G-CSF, atropine, and loperamide during 1L treatment with FFX, FFXnb, and GnP. Methods: This retrospective observational study utilized Optum Market Clarity claims + EHR linked data. Inclusion criteria were: adult patients (pts) diagnosed with mPDAC between January 1, 2015 and May 31, 2023; initiated treatment (index date) with 1L FFX, FFXnb, or GnP -14 to +90 days from diagnosis; no evidence of other cancers in 6 months pre-index continuous enrollment; at least one EHR record post-index. G-CSF PPx was defined as administration/fill within 7 days of the start of a treatment, inclusive. PPx with atropine or loperamide was defined as administration/fill the day before or day of a treatment; all other use was categorized “non-PPx”. Pts may appear in both PPx and non-PPx categories. Results: Rates of overall use, PPx, and non-PPx for each medication of interest are shown (Table). The overall G-CSF use rate was >3.5 times higher for FFX and FFXnb vs GnP. While ≥70% of FFX/FFXnb pts received PPx, non-PPx still occurred in more than 1 in 8 pts. One-fifth of FFX and FFXnb pts received atropine at any time, vs. just 6% of GnP pts. Atropine PPx was less common than non-PPx for FFX/FFXnb and was rare in GnP pts. Similar to the other medications, loperamide was observed more for FFX and FFXnb vs. GnP, but was the least common of the medications, used by <10% of pts in any regimen. PPx and non-PPx use were similar. Use of the three medications was similar between FFX and FFXnb. Conclusions: In a RW cohort of 1L mPDAC pts, G-CSF and antidiarrheal use was more common in FFX and FFXnb than GnP pts. Most FFX and FFXnb pts received PPx G-CSF, reflecting clinician efforts to manage the high risk of neutropenia with these regimens. Non-PPx G-CSF still occurred in 14–18% of pts. FFXnb had similar rates of concomitant medications as FFX, indicating that removing the 5FU bolus may have minor impact on the need for some supportive medications. Concomitant medication use. Medication 1L FFX(n=511) 1L FFXnb(n=583) 1L GnP(n=958) G-CSF % treated overall 77% 71% 20% % PPx 76% 70% 17% % non-PPx 18% 14% 9% Atropine % treated overall 20% 20% 6% % PPx 11% 9% 2% % non-PPx 15% 16% 5% Loperamide % treated overall 7% 9% 3% % PPx 4% 5% 1% % non-PPx 4% 6% 2%

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US), Genesis Medical Center (US)
Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.