Investigating communication barriers impacting postoperative decision regret in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

698 Background: Patient communication barriers are associated with worse quality of care and clinical outcomes. However there are limited data exploring their impact on shared decision-making (SDM) in the preoperative setting, especially for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study investigates the impact of patient communication barriers on patient-physician communication surrounding the decision to pursue pancreatectomy. Methods: This cross-sectional study investigates the impact of communication barriers on the degree of decisional regret (DR) in patients with PDAC who have undergone curative-intent resection at least 6 months prior to study recruitment. Patients completed validated surveys assessing communication preferences, SDM participation, and DR. Health literacy was assessed by the BRIEF Health Literacy survey. Groups were stratified by presence or absence of DR, assessed by the Decisional Regret Scale (DRS). Characteristics and survey scores were compared by chi-square and independent t-test. Given significant findings, results of this interim analysis are reported below. Results: 45 patients met inclusion criteria and completed all questionnaires. 19 (42.2%) patients expressed regret about their decision to pursue surgery with 5 patients expressing moderate to severe regret (DRS ≥25). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. There were no significant differences in neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatments, or operative characteristics. Both groups reported high participation in preoperative SDM (average score 34.47 ± 9.67 in DR group vs 36.08 ± 8.88, P=0.567). Despite similar levels of education between groups, those expressing regret had a lower level of health literacy (14.68 ± 4.10 vs 17.35 ± 2.07, P=0.016). Fewer patients also identified English as their primary language in the DR group (78.9% vs 100%, P=0.026). While most patients preferred an active role in the final decision making process, fewer patients in the DR group reported this happening in actuality (ƙ= 0.635 vs ƙ=0.934). Conclusions: Almost half of patients expressed some regret pursuing surgery for PDAC. Despite similar educational backgrounds, a higher proportion of those expressing regret did not identify English as their primary language and had lower health literacy. While there was high participation in SDM, there was greater discordance between preferred and actual roles in the final decision making process. This identifies an important disparity to address in future preoperative discussions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.698
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating communication barriers impacting postoperative decision regret in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Judy Li, Spiros P Hiotis, Camilo Correa, Myron Schwartz et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Investigating communication barriers impacting postoperative decision regret in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Judy Li, Spiros P Hiotis, Camilo Correa, Myron Schwartz, Adam Geffner, Parissa Tabrizian, Noah A. Cohen, Umut Sarpel, James O. Park, Thomas M Li, Daniel M. Labow, Ganesh Gunasekaran, Sophie Neugarten
article en

Abstract

698 Background: Patient communication barriers are associated with worse quality of care and clinical outcomes. However there are limited data exploring their impact on shared decision-making (SDM) in the preoperative setting, especially for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study investigates the impact of patient communication barriers on patient-physician communication surrounding the decision to pursue pancreatectomy. Methods: This cross-sectional study investigates the impact of communication barriers on the degree of decisional regret (DR) in patients with PDAC who have undergone curative-intent resection at least 6 months prior to study recruitment. Patients completed validated surveys assessing communication preferences, SDM participation, and DR. Health literacy was assessed by the BRIEF Health Literacy survey. Groups were stratified by presence or absence of DR, assessed by the Decisional Regret Scale (DRS). Characteristics and survey scores were compared by chi-square and independent t-test. Given significant findings, results of this interim analysis are reported below. Results: 45 patients met inclusion criteria and completed all questionnaires. 19 (42.2%) patients expressed regret about their decision to pursue surgery with 5 patients expressing moderate to severe regret (DRS ≥25). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. There were no significant differences in neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatments, or operative characteristics. Both groups reported high participation in preoperative SDM (average score 34.47 ± 9.67 in DR group vs 36.08 ± 8.88, P=0.567). Despite similar levels of education between groups, those expressing regret had a lower level of health literacy (14.68 ± 4.10 vs 17.35 ± 2.07, P=0.016). Fewer patients also identified English as their primary language in the DR group (78.9% vs 100%, P=0.026). While most patients preferred an active role in the final decision making process, fewer patients in the DR group reported this happening in actuality (ƙ= 0.635 vs ƙ=0.934). Conclusions: Almost half of patients expressed some regret pursuing surgery for PDAC. Despite similar educational backgrounds, a higher proportion of those expressing regret did not identify English as their primary language and had lower health literacy. While there was high participation in SDM, there was greater discordance between preferred and actual roles in the final decision making process. This identifies an important disparity to address in future preoperative discussions.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Covance (United States) (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.