Circulating tumor DNA as a marker of recurrence risk in stage III colorectal cancer: The α-CORRECT study.

302 Background: Patients with stage III CRC undergo surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Evaluation of MRD using a highly sensitive and specific, tumor-informed ctDNA assay may help predict which patients will have a recurrence. Methods: Patients with stage III CRC were enrolled after surgery in an observational study across 19 Pennsylvanian hospitals between 2016-2020. Tumor tissue and serial blood samples (every 3 months for years 1-3, biannually for years 4-5) were collected. Following whole exome sequencing (WES) of the tumor and selection of 50 – 200 somatic variants, a personalized MRD assay was used to measure ctDNA status of each sample. Three timepoints were used to analyze the association of ctDNA with recurrence: the single sample post-surgical (PS) and post-definitive therapy (PDT) timepoints, and the surveillance period, which included the PDT and subsequent samples. Primary endpoint was the association of ctDNA status during surveillance with recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results: A total of 124 patients with 1029 ctDNA results were analyzed. Almost all patients (96.0%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, primarily with an oxaliplatin-based regimen. On average, patients had 10 (SD = 4.5) blood draws and the median follow-up was 4.8 years. WES identified 172 (range 50 – 200) somatic variants per patient on average. Patients who were ctDNA positive during surveillance had a significantly higher likelihood of recurrence than patients who remained ctDNA negative (HR 49.6, 95% CI: 16.6 – 148.3; ctDNA status as time-dependent variable). At all timepoints, ctDNA detection was strongly associated with recurrence (Table). In multivariable analyses, ctDNA was strongly prognostic for recurrence but CEA was not. The median lead time between positive ctDNA result and a clinical diagnosis of recurrence was 10.4 months. Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with stage III CRC with long-term follow-up, a tumor-informed ctDNA assay using up to 200 variants was strongly prognostic for recurrence at all timepoints. Hazard ratios (HR), sensitivity, and specificity, with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), for the association of ctDNA status with recurrence-free survival (RFS) at the surveillance, postsurgical (PS), and post-definitive therapy (PDT) timepoints (three-year RFS for the PS and PDT timepoints are also shown). Timepoint Statistic Result Surveillance(N = 111) HR(95% CI) 49.6**(16.6 – 148.3) Sensitivity(95% CI) 20/22 = 90.9%(72.2 – 97.5%) Specificity(95% CI) 82/87 = 94.3%(87.2 – 97.5%) PS(N = 88) HR(95% CI) 9.6**(3.2 – 29.5) Sensitivity(95% CI) 14/18 = 77.8%(54.8 – 91.0%) Specificity(95% CI) 53/66 = 80.3%(69.2 – 88.1%) RFS at 3 yrsctDNA(+), ctDNA(-) 54.5%, 96.1% PDT(N = 97) HR(95% CI) 16.7**(6.9 – 40.3) Sensitivity(95% CI) 10/21 = 47.6%(28.3 – 67.6%) Specificity(95% CI) 75/76 = 98.7%(92.9 – 99.8%) RFS at 3 yrsctDNA(+), ctDNA(-) 18.2%, 90.0% *P< 0.001, **P<0.0001.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.302
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Circulating tumor DNA as a marker of recurrence risk in stage III colorectal cancer: The α-CORRECT study.

Amin R. Mazloom, Greg Young, Melanie R. Palomares, Jorge Garces et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
article

Circulating tumor DNA as a marker of recurrence risk in stage III colorectal cancer: The α-CORRECT study.

Amin R. Mazloom, Greg Young, Melanie R. Palomares, Jorge Garces, David W. Hall, Tara Marti, Robert E. Schoen, Frederick L. Baehner, Brenda Diergaarde, Somasundaram Subramaniam, Gina L. Costa
article en

Abstract

302 Background: Patients with stage III CRC undergo surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Evaluation of MRD using a highly sensitive and specific, tumor-informed ctDNA assay may help predict which patients will have a recurrence. Methods: Patients with stage III CRC were enrolled after surgery in an observational study across 19 Pennsylvanian hospitals between 2016-2020. Tumor tissue and serial blood samples (every 3 months for years 1-3, biannually for years 4-5) were collected. Following whole exome sequencing (WES) of the tumor and selection of 50 – 200 somatic variants, a personalized MRD assay was used to measure ctDNA status of each sample. Three timepoints were used to analyze the association of ctDNA with recurrence: the single sample post-surgical (PS) and post-definitive therapy (PDT) timepoints, and the surveillance period, which included the PDT and subsequent samples. Primary endpoint was the association of ctDNA status during surveillance with recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results: A total of 124 patients with 1029 ctDNA results were analyzed. Almost all patients (96.0%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, primarily with an oxaliplatin-based regimen. On average, patients had 10 (SD = 4.5) blood draws and the median follow-up was 4.8 years. WES identified 172 (range 50 – 200) somatic variants per patient on average. Patients who were ctDNA positive during surveillance had a significantly higher likelihood of recurrence than patients who remained ctDNA negative (HR 49.6, 95% CI: 16.6 – 148.3; ctDNA status as time-dependent variable). At all timepoints, ctDNA detection was strongly associated with recurrence (Table). In multivariable analyses, ctDNA was strongly prognostic for recurrence but CEA was not. The median lead time between positive ctDNA result and a clinical diagnosis of recurrence was 10.4 months. Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with stage III CRC with long-term follow-up, a tumor-informed ctDNA assay using up to 200 variants was strongly prognostic for recurrence at all timepoints. Hazard ratios (HR), sensitivity, and specificity, with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), for the association of ctDNA status with recurrence-free survival (RFS) at the surveillance, postsurgical (PS), and post-definitive therapy (PDT) timepoints (three-year RFS for the PS and PDT timepoints are also shown). Timepoint Statistic Result Surveillance(N = 111) HR(95% CI) 49.6**(16.6 – 148.3) Sensitivity(95% CI) 20/22 = 90.9%(72.2 – 97.5%) Specificity(95% CI) 82/87 = 94.3%(87.2 – 97.5%) PS(N = 88) HR(95% CI) 9.6**(3.2 – 29.5) Sensitivity(95% CI) 14/18 = 77.8%(54.8 – 91.0%) Specificity(95% CI) 53/66 = 80.3%(69.2 – 88.1%) RFS at 3 yrsctDNA(+), ctDNA(-) 54.5%, 96.1% PDT(N = 97) HR(95% CI) 16.7**(6.9 – 40.3) Sensitivity(95% CI) 10/21 = 47.6%(28.3 – 67.6%) Specificity(95% CI) 75/76 = 98.7%(92.9 – 99.8%) RFS at 3 yrsctDNA(+), ctDNA(-) 18.2%, 90.0% *P< 0.001, **P<0.0001.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
University of Pittsburgh (US), Exact Sciences (United States) (US), UPMC Hillman Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.