Assessing impact of postoperative outcomes and quality of life on decisional regret after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

699 Background: Surgery is potentially curative for patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Given the high rate of complications, decline in quality of life (QoL) postoperatively, and high rates of recurrence, clear preoperative communication and expectation setting is critical. This study investigates clinical outcomes that affect postoperative decisional regret (DR) in patients with PDAC. Methods: This mixed-methods study investigates the impact of clinical outcomes and QoL on the degree of DR in patients with PDAC who have undergone curative-intent resection at least 6 months prior to study recruitment. Patients completed validated surveys assessing DR and QoL by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Groups are stratified by presence or absence of DR, assessed by the Decisional Regret Scale (DRS). Characteristics and survey scores were compared by chi-square, independent t-test, and median test. Narrative responses were thematically analyzed. Given significant findings, results of this interim analysis are reported below. Results: 45 patients met inclusion criteria and completed all questionnaires. 19 (42.2%) patients expressed regret about their decision to pursue curative-intent surgery, with 5 patients expressing moderate to severe regret (DRS ≥ 25). There was no significant difference in median postoperative timing of survey completion between groups (56 months in DR group vs 34 months, P=0.465). Baseline characteristics, medical treatments, and operative approaches were similar. Both groups had similar recurrence rates at time of survey completion. While 30 and 90 day readmission rates were similar, a greater proportion of the DR group had 30 day complications (42.1% vs 15.4%, P=0.045). Those expressing regret reported poorer physical functional status (mean score 79.30 ± 18.84 vs 92.31 ± 10.27, P=0.011) and greater impact on social activities (mean score 67.54 ± 33.55 vs 84.67 ± 19.19, P=0.038). Thematic analysis of narrative responses revealed that a majority of patients expressed a strong desire to have a greater focus on potential QoL changes during preoperative discussions. Conclusions: Patients expressing postoperative DR experienced more 30 day complications, and still report lasting effects on their current physical status and social activities. This emphasizes the importance of thorough preoperative counseling on surgical risks and potential changes in postoperative QoL so that patients may make the best informed decision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.699
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing impact of postoperative outcomes and quality of life on decisional regret after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Judy Li, Spiros P Hiotis, Myron Schwartz, Adam Geffner et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Assessing impact of postoperative outcomes and quality of life on decisional regret after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Judy Li, Spiros P Hiotis, Myron Schwartz, Adam Geffner, Parissa Tabrizian, Umut Sarpel, Thomas M Li, Noah Cohen, Camilo Correa‐Gallego, Daniel M. Labow, Ganesh Gunasekaran, James O Park, Sophie Neugarten
article en

Abstract

699 Background: Surgery is potentially curative for patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Given the high rate of complications, decline in quality of life (QoL) postoperatively, and high rates of recurrence, clear preoperative communication and expectation setting is critical. This study investigates clinical outcomes that affect postoperative decisional regret (DR) in patients with PDAC. Methods: This mixed-methods study investigates the impact of clinical outcomes and QoL on the degree of DR in patients with PDAC who have undergone curative-intent resection at least 6 months prior to study recruitment. Patients completed validated surveys assessing DR and QoL by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Groups are stratified by presence or absence of DR, assessed by the Decisional Regret Scale (DRS). Characteristics and survey scores were compared by chi-square, independent t-test, and median test. Narrative responses were thematically analyzed. Given significant findings, results of this interim analysis are reported below. Results: 45 patients met inclusion criteria and completed all questionnaires. 19 (42.2%) patients expressed regret about their decision to pursue curative-intent surgery, with 5 patients expressing moderate to severe regret (DRS ≥ 25). There was no significant difference in median postoperative timing of survey completion between groups (56 months in DR group vs 34 months, P=0.465). Baseline characteristics, medical treatments, and operative approaches were similar. Both groups had similar recurrence rates at time of survey completion. While 30 and 90 day readmission rates were similar, a greater proportion of the DR group had 30 day complications (42.1% vs 15.4%, P=0.045). Those expressing regret reported poorer physical functional status (mean score 79.30 ± 18.84 vs 92.31 ± 10.27, P=0.011) and greater impact on social activities (mean score 67.54 ± 33.55 vs 84.67 ± 19.19, P=0.038). Thematic analysis of narrative responses revealed that a majority of patients expressed a strong desire to have a greater focus on potential QoL changes during preoperative discussions. Conclusions: Patients expressing postoperative DR experienced more 30 day complications, and still report lasting effects on their current physical status and social activities. This emphasizes the importance of thorough preoperative counseling on surgical risks and potential changes in postoperative QoL so that patients may make the best informed decision.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Covance (United States) (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.