Real-world microscopic residual disease (MRD) monitoring with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

696 Background: ctDNA is a powerful tool that can detect MRD with limited but emerging data in patients (pts) with PDAC. We describe the clinical outcomes of pts with PDAC who underwent real-world MRD testing at our institutions. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed pts at 2 institutions with ≥1 tumor-informed ctDNA test (Natera, Inc) ordered for MRD testing post-operation (post-op) between June 2020-August 2024. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize clinicopathologic factors, ctDNA positivity (ctDNA+), and relapse rates (RR). Median relapse-free survival (mRFS) and overall survival (mOS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods, comparisons between groups by log-rank test, and hazard ratios (HR) by Cox proportional hazard models. Associations between clinicopathologic factors and outcomes were assessed by Fisher’s exact and Chi-square tests. Results: Of the 54 pts who underwent MRD testing, 48 pts (88.9%) had successful tests. Failures were due to insufficient tissue. Patients with successful tests were staged as follows: 31.2% stage 1, 50.0% stage 2, and 18.8% stage 3, with 12.5% having R1/2 resections and 46.8% being node-positive. With a median follow-up of 21.0 months (mo), 22 (45.8%) pts had relapsed and 22 (45.8%) were anytime-ctDNA+. Sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA for relapse was 77.3% and 86.4%, respectively. Between anytime- and never-ctDNA+ pts, RR were 77.0% vs. 23.1%, mRFS 14.2 mo vs. not reached (NR) (HR 4.9, 95% CI 1.9-12.9), and mOS 31.7 mo vs. NR (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.0-10.9), respectively. For 27 pts tested in the MRD window (2-12 weeks post-op), mRFS was 6.6 vs. 25.0 mo (HR 3.1, 95% CI 1.0-9.4) and mOS was 25.5 mo vs. NR (HR 2.5, 95% CI 0.6-10.2) in ctDNA+ vs. negative pts. ctDNA+ preceded radiographic relapse in 54.5% of patients with a median lead time of 166 days (IQR 70-332). In anytime-ctDNA+ pts, there were non-statistically significant trends for improved RFS and OS based on ctDNA decrease and clearance (table). No clinicopathologic factors predicted ctDNA+. Post-op ctDNA+ (p <0.001) and CA 19-9 (p=0.03) were the only factors that had a significant association with RFS. Conclusions: Post-op ctDNA is a strong prognostic marker for survival in PDAC, predicting relapse about five months before imaging. ctDNA+ status is independent of clinicopathologic factors and the strongest predictor of recurrence. These findings highlight a window where novel therapies could be tested to eradicate MRD. Longer follow up and prospective studies are needed to validate its predictive role with therapies in the MRD setting to improve outcomes in high-risk pts. RFS events/total mRFS (mo) HR (95% CI) p OS events/total mOS (mo) HR (95% CI) p ctDNA clearance Yes 6/9 17.0 0.61 (0.2-1.7) 0.35 2/9 NR 0.37 (0.08-1.8) 0.20 No 11/13 10.3 8/13 31.7 ctDNA MTM/mL reduction ≥50% 8/11 15.5 0.93 (0.3-2.9) 0.90 3/11 NR 0.54 (0.1-2.4) 0.42 <50% 6/8 13.6 4/8 31.7

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.696
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world microscopic residual disease (MRD) monitoring with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Xue Geng, John Marshall, Reetu Mukherji, Anteneh Tesfaye et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
0.94
article

Real-world microscopic residual disease (MRD) monitoring with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Xue Geng, John Marshall, Reetu Mukherji, Anteneh Tesfaye, Aiwu Ruth He, Benjamin A. Weinberg, Marcus Smith Noel, Alan Schumann, Harrison David Winters, Hongkun Wang, Peter Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

696 Background: ctDNA is a powerful tool that can detect MRD with limited but emerging data in patients (pts) with PDAC. We describe the clinical outcomes of pts with PDAC who underwent real-world MRD testing at our institutions. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed pts at 2 institutions with ≥1 tumor-informed ctDNA test (Natera, Inc) ordered for MRD testing post-operation (post-op) between June 2020-August 2024. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize clinicopathologic factors, ctDNA positivity (ctDNA+), and relapse rates (RR). Median relapse-free survival (mRFS) and overall survival (mOS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods, comparisons between groups by log-rank test, and hazard ratios (HR) by Cox proportional hazard models. Associations between clinicopathologic factors and outcomes were assessed by Fisher’s exact and Chi-square tests. Results: Of the 54 pts who underwent MRD testing, 48 pts (88.9%) had successful tests. Failures were due to insufficient tissue. Patients with successful tests were staged as follows: 31.2% stage 1, 50.0% stage 2, and 18.8% stage 3, with 12.5% having R1/2 resections and 46.8% being node-positive. With a median follow-up of 21.0 months (mo), 22 (45.8%) pts had relapsed and 22 (45.8%) were anytime-ctDNA+. Sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA for relapse was 77.3% and 86.4%, respectively. Between anytime- and never-ctDNA+ pts, RR were 77.0% vs. 23.1%, mRFS 14.2 mo vs. not reached (NR) (HR 4.9, 95% CI 1.9-12.9), and mOS 31.7 mo vs. NR (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.0-10.9), respectively. For 27 pts tested in the MRD window (2-12 weeks post-op), mRFS was 6.6 vs. 25.0 mo (HR 3.1, 95% CI 1.0-9.4) and mOS was 25.5 mo vs. NR (HR 2.5, 95% CI 0.6-10.2) in ctDNA+ vs. negative pts. ctDNA+ preceded radiographic relapse in 54.5% of patients with a median lead time of 166 days (IQR 70-332). In anytime-ctDNA+ pts, there were non-statistically significant trends for improved RFS and OS based on ctDNA decrease and clearance (table). No clinicopathologic factors predicted ctDNA+. Post-op ctDNA+ (p <0.001) and CA 19-9 (p=0.03) were the only factors that had a significant association with RFS. Conclusions: Post-op ctDNA is a strong prognostic marker for survival in PDAC, predicting relapse about five months before imaging. ctDNA+ status is independent of clinicopathologic factors and the strongest predictor of recurrence. These findings highlight a window where novel therapies could be tested to eradicate MRD. Longer follow up and prospective studies are needed to validate its predictive role with therapies in the MRD setting to improve outcomes in high-risk pts. RFS events/total mRFS (mo) HR (95% CI) p OS events/total mOS (mo) HR (95% CI) p ctDNA clearance Yes 6/9 17.0 0.61 (0.2-1.7) 0.35 2/9 NR 0.37 (0.08-1.8) 0.20 No 11/13 10.3 8/13 31.7 ctDNA MTM/mL reduction ≥50% 8/11 15.5 0.93 (0.3-2.9) 0.90 3/11 NR 0.54 (0.1-2.4) 0.42 <50% 6/8 13.6 4/8 31.7

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
Brooke Army Medical Center (US), Georgetown University (US), Georgetown University Medical Center (US), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Joint Base San Antonio (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
0.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.