Comparison of risk factors, treatment strategy, and outcomes of early- vs. older-onset colorectal cancer within the prospective ColoCare study.

95 Background: The incidence of colorectal cancer among young adults aged 20-49 has continually increased in recent decades. Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) patients are more likely to be diagnosed at a more advanced stage of disease, have hereditary cancer syndromes, and have different molecular pathological features of disease than later-onset patients. Herein we compare the risk factors, treatment approaches, and responses to treatment of early-onset versus later-onset colorectal cancer within. Methods: The ColoCare Study is a prospective cohort enrolling individuals diagnosed with primary colorectal cancer at six different cancer centers in the United States and one in Germany. Serial questionnaires assess demographic characteristics and symptoms experienced prior to diagnosis, while clinical characteristics (including staging, pathology, treatments given) are abstracted from medical records. Restricting to patients with available age and stage, patients diagnosed <50 years old were labeled as “early-onset” and ≥50yo as “later-onset.” Associations between patient age and characteristics of interest were tested using Fisher’s Exact Test for count data. Results: Of the3,173 patients included in this analysis, 78% were later-onset (mean: 65 years) and 22% were early-onset (mean: 42 years). Demographic data was comparable between the two groups, with 43% being female. Though similar rates of ever alcohol use were seen between the two groups, early-onset patients reported consuming fewer weekly alcoholic beverages than later-onset patients (mean (standard deviation) of 5.5 (6.6) vs. 8.4 (9.3)). Early-onset patients were less likely to have ever smoked tobacco (38% vs 51%, p<0.001) and had lower rates of obesity (27% vs 31%) or overweight (34% vs 40%) than later-onset patients (p<0.001). For stage II/III disease, early-onset patients were more likely to have received chemotherapy and/or radiation treatment compared to later-onset patients (87% vs 70%, p<0.001), though both groups had similar rates of surgery. Despite this, younger patients did not appear to experience better outcomes, with 21% of younger patients experiencing a recurrence or new metastasis during follow-up versus 20% of later-onset patients. Conclusions: The risingincidence of colorectal cancer in early-onset patients does not appear to be explained by traditional risk factors such as alcohol use, tobacco use, or high BMI. Early-onset patients are more likely to receive chemotherapy or radiation, but observed outcomes are notably poorer compared to later-onset patients. Further statistical analysis on specifics of treatments by stage is ongoing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.95
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of risk factors, treatment strategy, and outcomes of early- vs. older-onset colorectal cancer within the prospective ColoCare study.

Victoria Damerell, Patricia Erıckson, Cornelia M. Ulrich, Nicole C. Loroña et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Comparison of risk factors, treatment strategy, and outcomes of early- vs. older-onset colorectal cancer within the prospective ColoCare study.

Victoria Damerell, Patricia Erıckson, Cornelia M. Ulrich, Nicole C. Loroña, Doratha A. Byrd, David Shibata, Jane C. Figueiredo, Sheetal Hardikar, Christopher I. Li, Kelsey K. Baker, Mary W. Redman, Caroline Himbert, Biljana Gigic, Mmadili N. Ilozumba, Stacey A. Cohen, Erin M. Siegel, Tengda Lin, Jennifer Ose, Adetunji T. Toriola, Zachary Gottschalk
article en

Abstract

95 Background: The incidence of colorectal cancer among young adults aged 20-49 has continually increased in recent decades. Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) patients are more likely to be diagnosed at a more advanced stage of disease, have hereditary cancer syndromes, and have different molecular pathological features of disease than later-onset patients. Herein we compare the risk factors, treatment approaches, and responses to treatment of early-onset versus later-onset colorectal cancer within. Methods: The ColoCare Study is a prospective cohort enrolling individuals diagnosed with primary colorectal cancer at six different cancer centers in the United States and one in Germany. Serial questionnaires assess demographic characteristics and symptoms experienced prior to diagnosis, while clinical characteristics (including staging, pathology, treatments given) are abstracted from medical records. Restricting to patients with available age and stage, patients diagnosed <50 years old were labeled as “early-onset” and ≥50yo as “later-onset.” Associations between patient age and characteristics of interest were tested using Fisher’s Exact Test for count data. Results: Of the3,173 patients included in this analysis, 78% were later-onset (mean: 65 years) and 22% were early-onset (mean: 42 years). Demographic data was comparable between the two groups, with 43% being female. Though similar rates of ever alcohol use were seen between the two groups, early-onset patients reported consuming fewer weekly alcoholic beverages than later-onset patients (mean (standard deviation) of 5.5 (6.6) vs. 8.4 (9.3)). Early-onset patients were less likely to have ever smoked tobacco (38% vs 51%, p<0.001) and had lower rates of obesity (27% vs 31%) or overweight (34% vs 40%) than later-onset patients (p<0.001). For stage II/III disease, early-onset patients were more likely to have received chemotherapy and/or radiation treatment compared to later-onset patients (87% vs 70%, p<0.001), though both groups had similar rates of surgery. Despite this, younger patients did not appear to experience better outcomes, with 21% of younger patients experiencing a recurrence or new metastasis during follow-up versus 20% of later-onset patients. Conclusions: The risingincidence of colorectal cancer in early-onset patients does not appear to be explained by traditional risk factors such as alcohol use, tobacco use, or high BMI. Early-onset patients are more likely to receive chemotherapy or radiation, but observed outcomes are notably poorer compared to later-onset patients. Further statistical analysis on specifics of treatments by stage is ongoing.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US), University of Washington (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of Utah (US), Heidelberg University (DE), Huntsman Cancer Institute (US), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Moffitt Cancer Center (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.