Quality of life following complete clinical response to chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: Patient-reported outcomes.

120 Background: Complete clinical response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy (chemoradiotherapy/total neoadjuvant treatment) for rectal cancer may permit an organ-preserving approach with “watch and wait” (W&W) surveillance. This confers comparable survival, while avoiding the sequelae of pelvic surgery. Data on quality of life (QOL) for this cohort are lacking. Methods: Patient-reported outcomes were collated for patients on W&W following cCR in a single hospital network. Validated questionnaires evaluating surgical, radiation and chemotherapy-related QOL were completed, including Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score, Functional Assessment of Chemotherapy: Colorectal (FACT-C), EORTC QLQ-CIPN20, EQ-5D-5L and a linear analogue and ordinal scale ranking self-perception of health. Results: From 2016-2023, 76 patients were enrolled on W&W. Median follow-up is 37 months (IQR20-63). 12 patients (15.8%) had local regrowth, of whom 11 (92%) had salvage surgery. Five patients (6.5%) developed metastases at median 8 months (IQR3-12) from W&W entry. Of 57 patients (75%) with sustained cCR on surveillance, 44 (77%) responded to structured questionnaires. Two with stomas were excluded from LARS. 74% of respondents had no LARS, 9% minor LARS and 17% major LARS. 43% reported faecal urgency and 33% faecal incontinence. 41% experienced functional impairment due to chronic chemotherapy-related side effects (Table). Median EORTC CIPN20 score was 23 (IQR20-28; possible range 19-76, high score = poor QOL). Median sensory score was 11 (IQR9-15.5, PR 9-36), median motor score 8 (IQR8-11, PR 8-32) and median autonomic score 4 (IQR3-6) for males (PR 3-12) and 2 (IQR2-2.5) for females (PR 2-8). 54% of men reported erectile dysfunction, of whom 62% experienced severe dysfunction (33% of all males). Median FACT-C score was 123.5 (IQR108-131; PR 0-136, high score = better QOL). Median overall health score was 80% (IQR70-95). 36% of patients reported difficulty with mobility, 27% with usual activities and 11% with self-care. 30% declared ongoing physical pain/discomfort, while 23% live with anxiety/depression related to their diagnosis. Overall, 86% of reported problems were mild/moderate and 14% severe/very severe. Conclusions: This study highlights self-reported QOL in patients on W&W pathway following neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer. It provides important insight to side-effects of treatment escalation in hope of organ preservation, and presents vital information for the counselling of future patients. Patients (n=41) Upper limb paraesthesia 12 (29%) Lower limb paraesthesia 17 (41%) Difficulty with: - Walking/standing (foot drop or impaired sensation) 10 (24%) - Stairs/sit-to-stand (leg weakness) 11 (27%) - Hot/cold differentiation 4 (10%) - Holding pen/manipulating small objects/opening jar/bottle 12 (29%) Hearing impairment 13 (32%) Blurred vision 4 (10%)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.120
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality of life following complete clinical response to chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: Patient-reported outcomes.

Grainne M. O’Kane, Charles Gillham, David Gallagher, Katrina O'Connor et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
2.01
article

Quality of life following complete clinical response to chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: Patient-reported outcomes.

Grainne M. O’Kane, Charles Gillham, David Gallagher, Katrina O'Connor, Michael E. Kelly, Brian Mehigan, John O. Larkin, Maeve O’Neill, Delia Flannery, Paul McCormick
article en
1 citations

Abstract

120 Background: Complete clinical response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy (chemoradiotherapy/total neoadjuvant treatment) for rectal cancer may permit an organ-preserving approach with “watch and wait” (W&W) surveillance. This confers comparable survival, while avoiding the sequelae of pelvic surgery. Data on quality of life (QOL) for this cohort are lacking. Methods: Patient-reported outcomes were collated for patients on W&W following cCR in a single hospital network. Validated questionnaires evaluating surgical, radiation and chemotherapy-related QOL were completed, including Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score, Functional Assessment of Chemotherapy: Colorectal (FACT-C), EORTC QLQ-CIPN20, EQ-5D-5L and a linear analogue and ordinal scale ranking self-perception of health. Results: From 2016-2023, 76 patients were enrolled on W&W. Median follow-up is 37 months (IQR20-63). 12 patients (15.8%) had local regrowth, of whom 11 (92%) had salvage surgery. Five patients (6.5%) developed metastases at median 8 months (IQR3-12) from W&W entry. Of 57 patients (75%) with sustained cCR on surveillance, 44 (77%) responded to structured questionnaires. Two with stomas were excluded from LARS. 74% of respondents had no LARS, 9% minor LARS and 17% major LARS. 43% reported faecal urgency and 33% faecal incontinence. 41% experienced functional impairment due to chronic chemotherapy-related side effects (Table). Median EORTC CIPN20 score was 23 (IQR20-28; possible range 19-76, high score = poor QOL). Median sensory score was 11 (IQR9-15.5, PR 9-36), median motor score 8 (IQR8-11, PR 8-32) and median autonomic score 4 (IQR3-6) for males (PR 3-12) and 2 (IQR2-2.5) for females (PR 2-8). 54% of men reported erectile dysfunction, of whom 62% experienced severe dysfunction (33% of all males). Median FACT-C score was 123.5 (IQR108-131; PR 0-136, high score = better QOL). Median overall health score was 80% (IQR70-95). 36% of patients reported difficulty with mobility, 27% with usual activities and 11% with self-care. 30% declared ongoing physical pain/discomfort, while 23% live with anxiety/depression related to their diagnosis. Overall, 86% of reported problems were mild/moderate and 14% severe/very severe. Conclusions: This study highlights self-reported QOL in patients on W&W pathway following neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer. It provides important insight to side-effects of treatment escalation in hope of organ preservation, and presents vital information for the counselling of future patients. Patients (n=41) Upper limb paraesthesia 12 (29%) Lower limb paraesthesia 17 (41%) Difficulty with: - Walking/standing (foot drop or impaired sensation) 10 (24%) - Stairs/sit-to-stand (leg weakness) 11 (27%) - Hot/cold differentiation 4 (10%) - Holding pen/manipulating small objects/opening jar/bottle 12 (29%) Hearing impairment 13 (32%) Blurred vision 4 (10%)

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
St. Luke's Hospital (IE), St. James's Hospital (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.