Use of pathological response versus RECIST assessment in predicting relapse-free survival following neoadjuvant immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

633 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) administered prior to liver resection (LR) lead to pathological responses in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the relative value of pathological versus radiological response in predicting relapse-free survival (RFS) remains unclear. Methods: We pooled patient-level data from 111 patients (pts) with HCC receiving ICI prior to LR as part of 5 phase I/II trials and observational clinical studies conducted in 12 centres in the United States, United Kingdom and Asia, as part of an academic consortium (NeoHCC). Pathological response was measured as the percentage of non-viable tumour in the resected specimen, with major (pMR) and complete pathological response (pCR) corresponding to ≥70% and 100% tumour regression. Radiological overall response rate (ORR) was assessed by RECIST v1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria. We correlated pathological response and ORR with RFS using Cox regression. Results: Pts received preoperative ICI between Oct 5, 2017, and Nov 15, 2023, mostly ICI combinations (69%, n=76). Most pts were male (78%, n=87) with viral chronic liver disease (66%, n=73), BCLC stage A HCC (55%, n=61). ORR was 28% per RECIST v1.1 and 32% per mRECIST criteria (available for n=81). Out of the 104 pathologically evaluable pts, pMR and pCR rates were 32% (n=33) and 18% (n=19). Radiological response by RECIST v1.1 showed a significant correlation with pathological response (R 2 = 0.43, p<0.001). When using RECIST v1.1, 74% of pts with ORR achieved pMR vs 14% of those without ORR (n=23/31 vs 10/73, p<0.001). However, 30% of pMR were not predicted by ORR (n=10/33). The discrepancy between pMR and ORR decreased using mRECIST. ORR per mRECIST was 83% in pMR pts (n=19/23), whereas it was 10% in non-pMR (n=5/51). After a median follow-up of 27.2 mos (95%CI 22.3-32.1), median RFS for the whole cohort was 43.6 mos (95%CI 28.3-NE). Achievement of pMR, pCR and ORR was associated with improved RFS (Table). However, reduction in the risk of relapse and/or death was higher in pts achieving pMR or pCR than ORR, regardless of the use of RECIST v1.1 or mRECIST. Conversely, pts without pMR had a lower mRFS than pts without ORR (28.3 mos [95%CI 12.8-43.8] and 32.8 mos [95%CI 13.7-51.9], respectively). Conclusions: Whilst radiological responses to neoadjuvant ICI are associated with improved RFS in pts with HCC, achievement of pMR is more accurate than RECIST and mRECIST-based responses in predicting for RFS, with lack of pMR identifying pts at a higher risk of relapse or mortality. Cox regression for RFS HR (95% CI) p value pCR 0.19 (0.05-0.78) 0.02 pMR 0.25 (0.10-0.66) 0.005 RECIST 1.1 0.34 (0.13-0.86) 0.02 mRECIST 0.38 (0.13-1.11) 0.08 RFS, relapse-free survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; pCR, complete pathological response; pMR, major pathological response; mRECIST, modified RECIST.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.633
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of pathological response versus RECIST assessment in predicting relapse-free survival following neoadjuvant immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Maria Isabel Fiel, Daniel Shu, Robert A. Anders, Marina Baretti et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Use of pathological response versus RECIST assessment in predicting relapse-free survival following neoadjuvant immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Maria Isabel Fiel, Daniel Shu, Robert A. Anders, Marina Baretti, Stephen G. Ward, Vincent Yip, Pasquale Lombardi, Robert Goldin, Thomas U. Marron, Yung‐Yeh Su, Chiun Hsu, Bernardo Stefanini, Mark Yarchoan, Julia Blanter, Fionnuala Crowley, Madhava Pai, Sarah Slater, Rohini Sharma
article en

Abstract

633 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) administered prior to liver resection (LR) lead to pathological responses in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the relative value of pathological versus radiological response in predicting relapse-free survival (RFS) remains unclear. Methods: We pooled patient-level data from 111 patients (pts) with HCC receiving ICI prior to LR as part of 5 phase I/II trials and observational clinical studies conducted in 12 centres in the United States, United Kingdom and Asia, as part of an academic consortium (NeoHCC). Pathological response was measured as the percentage of non-viable tumour in the resected specimen, with major (pMR) and complete pathological response (pCR) corresponding to ≥70% and 100% tumour regression. Radiological overall response rate (ORR) was assessed by RECIST v1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria. We correlated pathological response and ORR with RFS using Cox regression. Results: Pts received preoperative ICI between Oct 5, 2017, and Nov 15, 2023, mostly ICI combinations (69%, n=76). Most pts were male (78%, n=87) with viral chronic liver disease (66%, n=73), BCLC stage A HCC (55%, n=61). ORR was 28% per RECIST v1.1 and 32% per mRECIST criteria (available for n=81). Out of the 104 pathologically evaluable pts, pMR and pCR rates were 32% (n=33) and 18% (n=19). Radiological response by RECIST v1.1 showed a significant correlation with pathological response (R 2 = 0.43, p<0.001). When using RECIST v1.1, 74% of pts with ORR achieved pMR vs 14% of those without ORR (n=23/31 vs 10/73, p<0.001). However, 30% of pMR were not predicted by ORR (n=10/33). The discrepancy between pMR and ORR decreased using mRECIST. ORR per mRECIST was 83% in pMR pts (n=19/23), whereas it was 10% in non-pMR (n=5/51). After a median follow-up of 27.2 mos (95%CI 22.3-32.1), median RFS for the whole cohort was 43.6 mos (95%CI 28.3-NE). Achievement of pMR, pCR and ORR was associated with improved RFS (Table). However, reduction in the risk of relapse and/or death was higher in pts achieving pMR or pCR than ORR, regardless of the use of RECIST v1.1 or mRECIST. Conversely, pts without pMR had a lower mRFS than pts without ORR (28.3 mos [95%CI 12.8-43.8] and 32.8 mos [95%CI 13.7-51.9], respectively). Conclusions: Whilst radiological responses to neoadjuvant ICI are associated with improved RFS in pts with HCC, achievement of pMR is more accurate than RECIST and mRECIST-based responses in predicting for RFS, with lack of pMR identifying pts at a higher risk of relapse or mortality. Cox regression for RFS HR (95% CI) p value pCR 0.19 (0.05-0.78) 0.02 pMR 0.25 (0.10-0.66) 0.005 RECIST 1.1 0.34 (0.13-0.86) 0.02 mRECIST 0.38 (0.13-1.11) 0.08 RFS, relapse-free survival; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; pCR, complete pathological response; pMR, major pathological response; mRECIST, modified RECIST.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Barts Health NHS Trust (GB), Royal London Hospital (GB), Mount Sinai Hospital (US), Tisch Hospital (US), National Taiwan University Hospital (TW), Johns Hopkins Hospital (US), National Cheng Kung University Hospital (TW), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Tisch Cancer Institute, Imperial College London (GB), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.