Intraperitoneal and intravenous paclitaxel plus S-1 versus intravenous paclitaxel plus S-1 in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis: Results from the multicenter, randomized, phase 3 DRAGON-01 trial.

327 Background: The optimal chemotherapeutic regimen for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis remains undefined. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal and intravenous paclitaxel plus S-1 (NIPS Group) versus paclitaxel plus S-1 (PS Group) in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, controlled, phase 3 trial, patients were recruited from 9 cancer centers in China. Eligible patients were aged 18~75 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0~1, histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma, peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer requiring definitive diagnosis by laparoscopy, without gastric outflow tract obstruction and intestinal obstruction, no prior treatment with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, targeted therapy or immunotherapy. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either intravenous paclitaxel at 50 mg/m² and intraperitoneal paclitaxel at 20 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, along with oral S-1 at a dose of 80 mg/m² on days 1~14, or intravenous paclitaxel at 70 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, along with oral S-1 at 80 mg/m² on days 1~14. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all participants. A sample size of 238 patients was calculated to provide 80% power with a one-sided alpha of 0.1, accounting for a 10% dropout rate. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test. Cox regression was used for multivariate analysis. A P -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: From May 10, 2017, to March 9, 2022, 246 patients were screened and 222 were included in the modified intention-to-treat population, of whom 148 patients were assigned to the NIPS Group and 74 to the PS group. As of data cutoff (March 9, 2024), the median survival time was 19.4 months (95% CI, 17.1~22.9), in the NIPS group and 13.9 months (95% CI, 10.3~16.1) in the PS group (HR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.49 - 0.88; P = 0.005). The 1-year and 2-year overall survival rates were 69.6% and 37.2% in the NIPS group, compared to 54.1% and 20.3% in the PS group. The most common grade 3~4 adverse events were leukopenia (21.7% in the NIPS group, and 24.7% in the PS group) and neutropenia (19.9% in the NIPS group, and 23.4% in the PS group). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusions: Intraperitoneal and intravenous paclitaxel plus S-1 significantly improved the overall survival compared to intravenous paclitaxel plus S-1 in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis, with manageable toxicity. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR-IIR-16009802.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.327
Citations
21
Primary Topic
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
42.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intraperitoneal and intravenous paclitaxel plus S-1 versus intravenous paclitaxel plus S-1 in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis: Results from the multicenter, randomized, phase 3 DRAGON-01 trial.

Zhongyin Yang, Chao Yan, Yanong Wang, Sheng Lu et al.
21 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
42.14
article

Intraperitoneal and intravenous paclitaxel plus S-1 versus intravenous paclitaxel plus S-1 in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis: Results from the multicenter, randomized, phase 3 DRAGON-01 trial.

Zhongyin Yang, Chao Yan, Yanong Wang, Sheng Lu, Jiren Yu, Zhenggang Zhu, Yunyun Xu, Kai Yin, Jun Zhang, Xiaowen Liu, Xinchun Liu, Min Shi, Kai Liu, Jian Chen, Zheng Shi, Jiayi Gu, Hui Cao, Dan Wu, Mingming Nie, Yiping Mou
article en
21 citations

Abstract

327 Background: The optimal chemotherapeutic regimen for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis remains undefined. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal and intravenous paclitaxel plus S-1 (NIPS Group) versus paclitaxel plus S-1 (PS Group) in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, controlled, phase 3 trial, patients were recruited from 9 cancer centers in China. Eligible patients were aged 18~75 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0~1, histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma, peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer requiring definitive diagnosis by laparoscopy, without gastric outflow tract obstruction and intestinal obstruction, no prior treatment with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, targeted therapy or immunotherapy. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either intravenous paclitaxel at 50 mg/m² and intraperitoneal paclitaxel at 20 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, along with oral S-1 at a dose of 80 mg/m² on days 1~14, or intravenous paclitaxel at 70 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, along with oral S-1 at 80 mg/m² on days 1~14. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all participants. A sample size of 238 patients was calculated to provide 80% power with a one-sided alpha of 0.1, accounting for a 10% dropout rate. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test. Cox regression was used for multivariate analysis. A P -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: From May 10, 2017, to March 9, 2022, 246 patients were screened and 222 were included in the modified intention-to-treat population, of whom 148 patients were assigned to the NIPS Group and 74 to the PS group. As of data cutoff (March 9, 2024), the median survival time was 19.4 months (95% CI, 17.1~22.9), in the NIPS group and 13.9 months (95% CI, 10.3~16.1) in the PS group (HR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.49 - 0.88; P = 0.005). The 1-year and 2-year overall survival rates were 69.6% and 37.2% in the NIPS group, compared to 54.1% and 20.3% in the PS group. The most common grade 3~4 adverse events were leukopenia (21.7% in the NIPS group, and 24.7% in the PS group) and neutropenia (19.9% in the NIPS group, and 23.4% in the PS group). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusions: Intraperitoneal and intravenous paclitaxel plus S-1 significantly improved the overall survival compared to intravenous paclitaxel plus S-1 in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis, with manageable toxicity. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR-IIR-16009802.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
Shandong University (CN), Second Military Medical University (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Renji Hospital (CN), Ruijin Hospital (CN), Westlake University (CN), Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (CN), Shandong Tumor Hospital (CN), Changhai Hospital (CN), Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (CN), Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Westlake University, School of Medicine (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University (CN), Shandong First Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
42.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.