Digesting danger: A two-decade study exploring the association between food processing and colon cancer.

87 Background: Dietary patterns play a significant role in cancer prevention and progression, yet the specific association of food processing with colon cancer remains largely under-investigated. The NOVA classification system categorizes foods by their level of processing, providing a unique way to examine this relationship. Colon cancer remains a leading global health concern, and emerging evidence points to diet as potential contributors. This study explores associations between NOVA-classified foods and colon cancer, offering new insights into the role of food processing in cancer development. Methods: Survey data from the NHANES database (from 1999 to 2018) was probed for demographic and clinically relevant data, and day one food journals were converted into NOVA classifications. Participants aged 20 and older were included for analysis, including those with and without colon cancer (n=339 and 47615, respectively). Independent two-sample t-tests were conducted to compare the mean proportion of daily energy consumption of various NOVA food categories between the two groups, and a Benjamini-Hochberg correction was applied to adjust for multiple comparisons at p<0.05. Sensitivity analyses were performed using total grams and percent total caloric intake as inputs. Subgroup analyses were conducted via a logistic regression model including BMI, age, ethnicity, gender, education, country of birth, and military service. Results: Individuals with colon cancer had higher intake of ham and salted meats (NOVA 3, adjusted p=0.028) compared to those without cancer. Conversely, individuals without cancer consumed more legumes (NOVA 1, adjusted p=0.028), oils (NOVA 2, adjusted p=0.023), and “other processed foods” that did not fall into a specific processed food category (NOVA 3, adjusted p=0.038). Subgroups analyses revealed a greater association with colon cancer for age greater than 50 and non-hispanic White ethnicity. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the only study at this scale that evaluates colon cancer prevalence in the context of dietary behaviors stratified by level of industrial processing. The significant associations between ham and salted meats consumption, age greater than 50, and non-Hispanic White ethnicity with increased cancer prevalence highlight the impact of dietary and demographic patterns on colorectal carcinogenesis. Additional studies are needed to confirm these hypotheses in the prospective setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.87
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digesting danger: A two-decade study exploring the association between food processing and colon cancer.

William Jin, Elise Katsnelson
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

Digesting danger: A two-decade study exploring the association between food processing and colon cancer.

William Jin, Elise Katsnelson
article en

Abstract

87 Background: Dietary patterns play a significant role in cancer prevention and progression, yet the specific association of food processing with colon cancer remains largely under-investigated. The NOVA classification system categorizes foods by their level of processing, providing a unique way to examine this relationship. Colon cancer remains a leading global health concern, and emerging evidence points to diet as potential contributors. This study explores associations between NOVA-classified foods and colon cancer, offering new insights into the role of food processing in cancer development. Methods: Survey data from the NHANES database (from 1999 to 2018) was probed for demographic and clinically relevant data, and day one food journals were converted into NOVA classifications. Participants aged 20 and older were included for analysis, including those with and without colon cancer (n=339 and 47615, respectively). Independent two-sample t-tests were conducted to compare the mean proportion of daily energy consumption of various NOVA food categories between the two groups, and a Benjamini-Hochberg correction was applied to adjust for multiple comparisons at p<0.05. Sensitivity analyses were performed using total grams and percent total caloric intake as inputs. Subgroup analyses were conducted via a logistic regression model including BMI, age, ethnicity, gender, education, country of birth, and military service. Results: Individuals with colon cancer had higher intake of ham and salted meats (NOVA 3, adjusted p=0.028) compared to those without cancer. Conversely, individuals without cancer consumed more legumes (NOVA 1, adjusted p=0.028), oils (NOVA 2, adjusted p=0.023), and “other processed foods” that did not fall into a specific processed food category (NOVA 3, adjusted p=0.038). Subgroups analyses revealed a greater association with colon cancer for age greater than 50 and non-hispanic White ethnicity. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the only study at this scale that evaluates colon cancer prevalence in the context of dietary behaviors stratified by level of industrial processing. The significant associations between ham and salted meats consumption, age greater than 50, and non-Hispanic White ethnicity with increased cancer prevalence highlight the impact of dietary and demographic patterns on colorectal carcinogenesis. Additional studies are needed to confirm these hypotheses in the prospective setting.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
University of Miami (US), Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.