LAPIS: Randomized phase 3 trial of chemotherapy (CTX) with and without pamrevlumab (PAM) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).

675 Background: PAM improved response, surgical eligibility, and resection rates when combined with CTX in phase 1/2 LAPC trials (NCT01181245; NCT02210559). LAPIS (NCT03941093) evaluated efficacy and safety of PAM + CTX in unresectable LAPC. Methods: LAPIS was a global, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of adults with treatment-naïve, -confirmed unresectable LAPC. Patients received (randomized 1:1) PAM (35 mg/kg Q2W) or placebo (PBO) plus CTX (gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel [GnP] or FOLFIRINOX [FFX] per standard protocol) for up to six 28-day cycles. based on changes in -9, on FDG-PET, resectability, with final surgical decision made by surgeon. Primary endpoint: overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints: event-free survival (EFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR. Safety (including treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]) was evaluated in patients who received treatment. Results: 143 and 141 patients (median [range] age, 65.0 [31–90] yrs; 53.2% male) were randomized to PAM and PBO arms. 142 and 141 received treatment: GnP, 114 (79.7%) and 112 (79.4%); FFX, 28 (19.6%) and 29 (20.6%). PAM (64.8%) and 96 PBO (68.1%) patients completed 6 treatment cycles. . Survival similar for PAM and PBO arms (Table) and did not differ by. For PAM + FFX vs PBO + FFX, respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders (39.3% vs 27.6%) and skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (53.6% vs 37.9%) occurred >10% more with PAM; TEAE frequencies were similar with PAM + GnP and PBO + GnP. One treatment-related death occurred in PAM arm. Conclusions: LAPIS contained important LAPC trial innovations: pre/post-CTX FDG-PET imaging, objective criteria for surgical intervention, external surgical review panel, and composite EFS measurement. Addition of PAM to CTX was not associated with additional toxicity but did not improve survival outcomes for unresectable LAPC. Clinical trial information: NCT03941093 . LAPIS endpoints. PAM arm (n=143) PBO arm (n=141) OS, months, median (95% CI) events=118 (82.5%)17.25 (15.47, 18.89) events=112 (79.4%)17.94 (14.59, 20.34) HR (95% CI)1.08 (0.83, 1.41)p=0.55 EFS, a months, median (95% CI) events=99 (69.2%)5.72 (5.59, 6.01) events=102 (72.3%)5.78 (5.62, 6.37) HR (95% CI)1.05 (0.78, 1.39) PFS, months, median (95% CI) events=48 (33.6%)9.36 (7.75, 11.79) events=44 (31.2%)9.40 (7.69, 10.84) HR (95% CI)1.01 (0.65, 1.56) ORR, n (%) 43 (30.1) 64 (45.4) OR (95% CI)0.50 (0.31, 0.82) Complete response 0 0 Partial response 43 (30.1) 64 (45.4) CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; OR, odds ratio. a Earliest of 1) failure to achieve local disease-free status at end of treatment and/or after surgery; 2) local or distant recurrence/progression; or 3) death.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.675
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LAPIS: Randomized phase 3 trial of chemotherapy (CTX) with and without pamrevlumab (PAM) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).

Michele Reni, Ewa Carrier, Roberto Pazo-Cid, Ende Zhao et al.
6 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
6.27
article

LAPIS: Randomized phase 3 trial of chemotherapy (CTX) with and without pamrevlumab (PAM) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).

Michele Reni, Ewa Carrier, Roberto Pazo-Cid, Ende Zhao, Vincent J. Picozzi, Andrés Jesús Muñoz Martín, Pascal Hammel, Khurum Khan, Jianjun Liu, Vaibhav Sahai, Teresa Macarulla, Daniel Lin, Woo Jin Lee
article en
6 citations

Abstract

675 Background: PAM improved response, surgical eligibility, and resection rates when combined with CTX in phase 1/2 LAPC trials (NCT01181245; NCT02210559). LAPIS (NCT03941093) evaluated efficacy and safety of PAM + CTX in unresectable LAPC. Methods: LAPIS was a global, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of adults with treatment-naïve, -confirmed unresectable LAPC. Patients received (randomized 1:1) PAM (35 mg/kg Q2W) or placebo (PBO) plus CTX (gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel [GnP] or FOLFIRINOX [FFX] per standard protocol) for up to six 28-day cycles. based on changes in -9, on FDG-PET, resectability, with final surgical decision made by surgeon. Primary endpoint: overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints: event-free survival (EFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR. Safety (including treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]) was evaluated in patients who received treatment. Results: 143 and 141 patients (median [range] age, 65.0 [31–90] yrs; 53.2% male) were randomized to PAM and PBO arms. 142 and 141 received treatment: GnP, 114 (79.7%) and 112 (79.4%); FFX, 28 (19.6%) and 29 (20.6%). PAM (64.8%) and 96 PBO (68.1%) patients completed 6 treatment cycles. . Survival similar for PAM and PBO arms (Table) and did not differ by. For PAM + FFX vs PBO + FFX, respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders (39.3% vs 27.6%) and skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (53.6% vs 37.9%) occurred >10% more with PAM; TEAE frequencies were similar with PAM + GnP and PBO + GnP. One treatment-related death occurred in PAM arm. Conclusions: LAPIS contained important LAPC trial innovations: pre/post-CTX FDG-PET imaging, objective criteria for surgical intervention, external surgical review panel, and composite EFS measurement. Addition of PAM to CTX was not associated with additional toxicity but did not improve survival outcomes for unresectable LAPC. Clinical trial information: NCT03941093 . LAPIS endpoints. PAM arm (n=143) PBO arm (n=141) OS, months, median (95% CI) events=118 (82.5%)17.25 (15.47, 18.89) events=112 (79.4%)17.94 (14.59, 20.34) HR (95% CI)1.08 (0.83, 1.41)p=0.55 EFS, a months, median (95% CI) events=99 (69.2%)5.72 (5.59, 6.01) events=102 (72.3%)5.78 (5.62, 6.37) HR (95% CI)1.05 (0.78, 1.39) PFS, months, median (95% CI) events=48 (33.6%)9.36 (7.75, 11.79) events=44 (31.2%)9.40 (7.69, 10.84) HR (95% CI)1.01 (0.65, 1.56) ORR, n (%) 43 (30.1) 64 (45.4) OR (95% CI)0.50 (0.31, 0.82) Complete response 0 0 Partial response 43 (30.1) 64 (45.4) CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; OR, odds ratio. a Earliest of 1) failure to achieve local disease-free status at end of treatment and/or after surgery; 2) local or distant recurrence/progression; or 3) death.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
Virginia Mason Medical Center (US), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), University of Michigan (US), Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (US), Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (ES), NYU Langone Health (US), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet (ES), National Cancer Center (KR), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT), FibroGen (United States) (US), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón (ES), Hôpital Paul-Brousse (FR), NYU Langone’s Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
6.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.