Association between ctDNA levels, timing of blood collection, and overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer.

245 Background: While circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection is influenced by various factors, the impact of blood collection timing remains understudied. This study investigated the relationship between ctDNA detection, and blood collection timing and prognosis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) from the GOZILA study. Methods: GOZILA is a nationwide plasma genomic profiling study using Guardant360 CDx for advanced solid tumors. This study evaluated the association of ctDNA levels with blood collection timing and prognosis in patients with mCRC. ctDNA levels were determined by the maximum variant allele frequency. Blood collection timing was categorized into five groups: naive (before initiation of 1st line treatment), after treatment initiation (days 1-14 of treatment), during treatment (between “after treatment initiation” and “before progression disease [PD]”), before PD (from 28 days before PD to PD), and after PD (after disease progression but before the next line of treatment). Overall survival (OS) was compared across treatment lines using ctDNA level cutoff of 10. Results: We analyzed 2,398 blood samples from 1,994 patients with mCRC enrolled in the GOZILA between February 2018 and July 2023. ctDNA levels were significantly lower during treatment compared to the naive (median, 13.2 vs. 5.7, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between naive and other blood collection timing. Compared to blood collection before 1st line treatment, ctDNA levels significantly decreased before 2nd line (median, 13.5 vs. 8.3, p = 0.02) and 3rd line treatments (median, 13.5 vs. 7.6, p = 0.01). Patients with ctDNA levels<10 demonstrated significantly better OS across all treatment lines, including 1st line (median, NA vs. 23.9 months, HR 0.49, 95% CI, 0.34-0.72), 2nd line (median, 22.1 vs. 10.3 months, HR 0.42, 95% CI, 0.33-0.55), and later line treatments (FTD/TPI: median, 12.7 vs. 5.7 months, HR 0.51, 95% CI, 0.26-0.99; FTD/TPI+Bev: median, 9.3 vs. 6.5 months, HR 0.55, 95% CI, 0.37-0.82; Regorafenib: median, 13.5 vs. 7.4 months, HR 0.45, 95% CI, 0.26-0.80). Conclusions: In mCRC, blood collection during treatment is suboptimal due to decreased ctDNA levels. Patients with ctDNA levels <10 showed significantly better OS across all treatment lines. Optimal timing of blood collection can enhance ctDNA levels, enabling more accurate gene mutation assessment and stratifying outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.245
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association between ctDNA levels, timing of blood collection, and overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Taito Esaki, Yu Sunakawa, Yoshiaki Nakamura, Tadayoshi Hashimoto et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
0.94
article

Association between ctDNA levels, timing of blood collection, and overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Taito Esaki, Yu Sunakawa, Yoshiaki Nakamura, Tadayoshi Hashimoto, Takeshi Kato, Hideaki Bando, Hironaga Satake, Tadamichi Denda, Yoshito Komatsu, Manabu Shiozawa, Akinori Kobayashi, Takayuki Yoshino, Hisateru Yasui, Hiroya Taniguchi, Naoki Takahashi, Kensei Yamaguchi, Takashi Ohta, Tomohiro Nishina
article en
1 citations

Abstract

245 Background: While circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection is influenced by various factors, the impact of blood collection timing remains understudied. This study investigated the relationship between ctDNA detection, and blood collection timing and prognosis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) from the GOZILA study. Methods: GOZILA is a nationwide plasma genomic profiling study using Guardant360 CDx for advanced solid tumors. This study evaluated the association of ctDNA levels with blood collection timing and prognosis in patients with mCRC. ctDNA levels were determined by the maximum variant allele frequency. Blood collection timing was categorized into five groups: naive (before initiation of 1st line treatment), after treatment initiation (days 1-14 of treatment), during treatment (between “after treatment initiation” and “before progression disease [PD]”), before PD (from 28 days before PD to PD), and after PD (after disease progression but before the next line of treatment). Overall survival (OS) was compared across treatment lines using ctDNA level cutoff of 10. Results: We analyzed 2,398 blood samples from 1,994 patients with mCRC enrolled in the GOZILA between February 2018 and July 2023. ctDNA levels were significantly lower during treatment compared to the naive (median, 13.2 vs. 5.7, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between naive and other blood collection timing. Compared to blood collection before 1st line treatment, ctDNA levels significantly decreased before 2nd line (median, 13.5 vs. 8.3, p = 0.02) and 3rd line treatments (median, 13.5 vs. 7.6, p = 0.01). Patients with ctDNA levels<10 demonstrated significantly better OS across all treatment lines, including 1st line (median, NA vs. 23.9 months, HR 0.49, 95% CI, 0.34-0.72), 2nd line (median, 22.1 vs. 10.3 months, HR 0.42, 95% CI, 0.33-0.55), and later line treatments (FTD/TPI: median, 12.7 vs. 5.7 months, HR 0.51, 95% CI, 0.26-0.99; FTD/TPI+Bev: median, 9.3 vs. 6.5 months, HR 0.55, 95% CI, 0.37-0.82; Regorafenib: median, 13.5 vs. 7.4 months, HR 0.45, 95% CI, 0.26-0.80). Conclusions: In mCRC, blood collection during treatment is suboptimal due to decreased ctDNA levels. Patients with ctDNA levels <10 showed significantly better OS across all treatment lines. Optimal timing of blood collection can enhance ctDNA levels, enabling more accurate gene mutation assessment and stratifying outcomes.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
Kansai Medical University (JP), St. Marianna University School of Medicine (JP), Kanagawa Prefectural Hospital Organization (JP), Osaka National Hospital (JP), National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center (JP), Kansai Rosai Hospital (JP), Chiba Cancer Center (JP), Saitama Cancer Center (JP), Aichi Cancer Center (JP), Shikoku Cancer Center (JP), Hokkaido University Hospital (JP), National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP), Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital (JP), Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research (JP), Kanagawa Cancer Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
0.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.