INSIGHT: A phase 3, randomized, open-label study of ripretinib vs sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor previously treated with imatinib with <i>KIT</i> exon 11 + 17/18 mutations.

TPS848 Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common gastrointestinal sarcoma, with approximately 80% of cases driven by KIT mutations. Most patients (pts) with advanced GIST experience disease progression following first-line treatment with imatinib due to KIT secondary resistance mutations occurring most commonly in the ATP-binding pocket (exons 13/14) and/or activation loop (exons 17/18). Sunitinib is approved as second-line therapy for advanced GIST. Ripretinib is a switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for pts with GIST who received prior treatment with 3 or more kinase inhibitors, including imatinib. In the INTRIGUE phase 3 study (NCT03673501) in second-line therapy for advanced GIST, ripretinib was not superior to sunitinib in terms of progression-free survival (PFS); however, a more favorable safety profile was observed with ripretinib vs sunitinib (Bauer S et al. J Clin Oncol . 2022). Exploratory mutational analysis from INTRIGUE using baseline circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) demonstrated that pts harboring primary KIT exon 11 mutations with secondary resistance mutations exclusively in KIT exons 17/18 derived PFS benefit with ripretinib vs sunitinib (median, 14.2 vs 1.5 months; HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.44; nominal P &lt;0.0001; Heinrich MC et al. Nat Med . 2024). Here, we describe an ongoing phase 3 study for pts with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib harboring KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations. Methods: INSIGHT (NCT05734105) is a phase 3, randomized, open-label study designed to evaluate the efficacy of ripretinib vs sunitinib in pts with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib and who harbor KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations. Eligible pts must be ≥18 years old with histologically confirmed GIST and co-occurring KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations confirmed by ctDNA analysis. Pts must also have advanced disease with ≥1 measurable lesion per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) v1.1, radiologic progression on imatinib, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2. Key exclusion criteria include a KIT exon 9, 13, or 14 mutation confirmed via ctDNA analysis at screening and prior treatment with another line of therapy in addition to imatinib for advanced GIST. A total of 54 pts will be randomized (2:1) to receive ripretinib 150 mg once daily (QD; continuous) or sunitinib 50 mg QD (4 weeks on/2 weeks off) in 6-week cycles. The primary endpoint is PFS by independent radiologic review (IRR) per mRECIST v1.1; key secondary endpoints are objective response rate by IRR using mRECIST v1.1 and overall survival. Safety and patient-reported outcome measures will also be assessed. Pts randomized to the sunitinib arm may cross over to the ripretinib arm upon disease progression. This abstract was originally presented at ASCO 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT05734105 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.tps848
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INSIGHT: A phase 3, randomized, open-label study of ripretinib vs sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor previously treated with imatinib with KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations.

Kam Sprott, John Raymond Zalcberg, William M. Reichmann, Hans Gelderblom et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
1.81
article

INSIGHT: A phase 3, randomized, open-label study of ripretinib vs sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor previously treated with imatinib with KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations.

Kam Sprott, John Raymond Zalcberg, William M. Reichmann, Hans Gelderblom, Ping Chi, Sebastian Bauer, Jean‐Yves Blay, Robin L. Jones, César Serrano, Suzanne George, Matthew L. Sherman, Neeta Somaiah, Michael C. Heinrich
article en
1 citations

Abstract

TPS848 Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common gastrointestinal sarcoma, with approximately 80% of cases driven by KIT mutations. Most patients (pts) with advanced GIST experience disease progression following first-line treatment with imatinib due to KIT secondary resistance mutations occurring most commonly in the ATP-binding pocket (exons 13/14) and/or activation loop (exons 17/18). Sunitinib is approved as second-line therapy for advanced GIST. Ripretinib is a switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for pts with GIST who received prior treatment with 3 or more kinase inhibitors, including imatinib. In the INTRIGUE phase 3 study (NCT03673501) in second-line therapy for advanced GIST, ripretinib was not superior to sunitinib in terms of progression-free survival (PFS); however, a more favorable safety profile was observed with ripretinib vs sunitinib (Bauer S et al. J Clin Oncol . 2022). Exploratory mutational analysis from INTRIGUE using baseline circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) demonstrated that pts harboring primary KIT exon 11 mutations with secondary resistance mutations exclusively in KIT exons 17/18 derived PFS benefit with ripretinib vs sunitinib (median, 14.2 vs 1.5 months; HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.44; nominal P &lt;0.0001; Heinrich MC et al. Nat Med . 2024). Here, we describe an ongoing phase 3 study for pts with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib harboring KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations. Methods: INSIGHT (NCT05734105) is a phase 3, randomized, open-label study designed to evaluate the efficacy of ripretinib vs sunitinib in pts with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib and who harbor KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations. Eligible pts must be ≥18 years old with histologically confirmed GIST and co-occurring KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations confirmed by ctDNA analysis. Pts must also have advanced disease with ≥1 measurable lesion per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) v1.1, radiologic progression on imatinib, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2. Key exclusion criteria include a KIT exon 9, 13, or 14 mutation confirmed via ctDNA analysis at screening and prior treatment with another line of therapy in addition to imatinib for advanced GIST. A total of 54 pts will be randomized (2:1) to receive ripretinib 150 mg once daily (QD; continuous) or sunitinib 50 mg QD (4 weeks on/2 weeks off) in 6-week cycles. The primary endpoint is PFS by independent radiologic review (IRR) per mRECIST v1.1; key secondary endpoints are objective response rate by IRR using mRECIST v1.1 and overall survival. Safety and patient-reported outcome measures will also be assessed. Pts randomized to the sunitinib arm may cross over to the ripretinib arm upon disease progression. This abstract was originally presented at ASCO 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT05734105 .

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Institute of Cancer Research (GB), Cornell University (US), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Portland VA Medical Center (US), Centre Léon Bérard (FR), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Essen University Hospital (DE), Deciphera Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US), VA Portland Health Care System (US), Alfred Health (AU), Weill Cornell Medicine (US), Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (ES), OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DE), Monash University (AU)
Deciphera Pharmaceuticals
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
1.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.