Total cost of care of immune-oncology treatments for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A Singapore healthcare perspective analysis.

642 Background: Tremelimumab + durvalumab (STRIDE) and atezolizumab + bevacizumab are recommended first-line immune-oncology treatment options for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). This study aimed to quantify the total economic burden to the Singapore healthcare system of treating patients with uHCC using STRIDE versus atezolizumab + bevacizumab. Methods: A model was developed to estimate the total cost of care of using STRIDE or atezolizumab + bevacizumab, which followed patients with uHCC eligible for first-line systemic therapy, considering direct medical costs. Costs considered in the model included treatment acquisition and administration, endoscopy, healthcare resource use, and cost for treating grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Data on treatment regimens and TEAEs were taken from the HIMALAYA (STRIDE) and IMbrave150 (atezolizumab + bevacizumab) trials. Resource use rates were based on an average of 168 days treatment for both regimens. All costs were obtained from Singaporean sources. Results: The total cost of care for STRIDE and atezolizumab + bevacizumab was estimated at SGD$40,277 (USD$30,932) and SGD$43,605 (USD$33,487) per patient, respectively. This translates into an average cost savings of SGD$3,328 (USD$2,555]) per patient when treated with STRIDE compared to atezolizumab + bevacizumab. The main driver of cost savings was treatment acquisition and administration (-SGD$1,917 [-USD$1,472], -6%) though lower costs were also associated with resource use (-SGD$927 [-USD$712], -8%), endoscopy (-SGD$342 [-USD$263], -77%) and TEAE management (-SGD$141 [-USD$108], -74%). Assuming an incident population of 260 patients eligible for treatment, the total burden was estimated at SGD$10,489,604 (USD$8,055,696) when all patients were treated with STRIDE, and SGD$11,356,273 (USD$8,721,271) when treated with atezolizumab + bevacizumab (Table). The incremental cost offset to the health plan was SGD$866,669 (USD$665,575) when treated with STRIDE. Conclusions: This study suggests that STRIDE offers cost savings over atezolizumab + bevacizumab for uHCC treatment in the Singapore healthcare system. Additional real-world evidence studies are warranted to capture the long-term survival benefits and associated treatment costs. Annual cost of care based on 260 patients receiving first-line immune-oncology treatment. Category STRIDE Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab Incremental difference Endoscopy costs $26,358 $115,555 -$89,197 Resource Use costs* $2,607,000 $2,848,307 -$241,307 Adverse events costs $12,899 $49,716 -$36,817 Treatment acquisition and administration $7,843,347 $8,342,696 -$499,349 TOTAL $10,489,604 $11,356,273 -$866,669 All costs in SGD$. *Includes: physician visits; laboratory and radiological tests; and hospitalisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2025.43.4_suppl.642
Primary Topic
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Total cost of care of immune-oncology treatments for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A Singapore healthcare perspective analysis.

D. K. C. Tay, Sing‐Chien Yap, Tania Krivasi, John Fullarton et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
article

Total cost of care of immune-oncology treatments for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A Singapore healthcare perspective analysis.

D. K. C. Tay, Sing‐Chien Yap, Tania Krivasi, John Fullarton, Barry Rodgers‐Gray
article en

Abstract

642 Background: Tremelimumab + durvalumab (STRIDE) and atezolizumab + bevacizumab are recommended first-line immune-oncology treatment options for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). This study aimed to quantify the total economic burden to the Singapore healthcare system of treating patients with uHCC using STRIDE versus atezolizumab + bevacizumab. Methods: A model was developed to estimate the total cost of care of using STRIDE or atezolizumab + bevacizumab, which followed patients with uHCC eligible for first-line systemic therapy, considering direct medical costs. Costs considered in the model included treatment acquisition and administration, endoscopy, healthcare resource use, and cost for treating grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Data on treatment regimens and TEAEs were taken from the HIMALAYA (STRIDE) and IMbrave150 (atezolizumab + bevacizumab) trials. Resource use rates were based on an average of 168 days treatment for both regimens. All costs were obtained from Singaporean sources. Results: The total cost of care for STRIDE and atezolizumab + bevacizumab was estimated at SGD$40,277 (USD$30,932) and SGD$43,605 (USD$33,487) per patient, respectively. This translates into an average cost savings of SGD$3,328 (USD$2,555]) per patient when treated with STRIDE compared to atezolizumab + bevacizumab. The main driver of cost savings was treatment acquisition and administration (-SGD$1,917 [-USD$1,472], -6%) though lower costs were also associated with resource use (-SGD$927 [-USD$712], -8%), endoscopy (-SGD$342 [-USD$263], -77%) and TEAE management (-SGD$141 [-USD$108], -74%). Assuming an incident population of 260 patients eligible for treatment, the total burden was estimated at SGD$10,489,604 (USD$8,055,696) when all patients were treated with STRIDE, and SGD$11,356,273 (USD$8,721,271) when treated with atezolizumab + bevacizumab (Table). The incremental cost offset to the health plan was SGD$866,669 (USD$665,575) when treated with STRIDE. Conclusions: This study suggests that STRIDE offers cost savings over atezolizumab + bevacizumab for uHCC treatment in the Singapore healthcare system. Additional real-world evidence studies are warranted to capture the long-term survival benefits and associated treatment costs. Annual cost of care based on 260 patients receiving first-line immune-oncology treatment. Category STRIDE Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab Incremental difference Endoscopy costs $26,358 $115,555 -$89,197 Resource Use costs* $2,607,000 $2,848,307 -$241,307 Adverse events costs $12,899 $49,716 -$36,817 Treatment acquisition and administration $7,843,347 $8,342,696 -$499,349 TOTAL $10,489,604 $11,356,273 -$866,669 All costs in SGD$. *Includes: physician visits; laboratory and radiological tests; and hospitalisation.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 43(4_suppl)
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB), AstraZeneca (Singapore) (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.