Peer Audit and Feedback: A Documentation-Focused Quality Improvement Project

Results support continued examination of peer audit and feedback to improve nursing documentation. Future projects should address the limited time for nurses to engage in QI projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality Management in Health Care
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/qmh.0000000000000496
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Sciences Research and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peer Audit and Feedback: A Documentation-Focused Quality Improvement Project

C. Shaw, Kelly Powers, Laura M Magennis, Maresa Glass
1 citations
Quality Management in Health Care
Health Sciences Research and Education
2.82
article

Peer Audit and Feedback: A Documentation-Focused Quality Improvement Project

C. Shaw, Kelly Powers, Laura M Magennis, Maresa Glass
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Results support continued examination of peer audit and feedback to improve nursing documentation. Future projects should address the limited time for nurses to engage in QI projects.

Quality Management in Health CareVol. 35(1)
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Health Sciences Research and Education
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Peer Audit and Feedback: A Documentation-Focused Quality Improvement Project — C. Shaw, Kelly Powers, et al. · Quality Management in Health Care (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS