Risk-Weight Calculation of Candidate Risk Factors for Incidental Osteoporotic Fracture in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: A Potentially Accurate Approach

Background/Objectives: To assess the risk of osteoporotic fractures in patients with rheumatic diseases (RDs), we introduced a new approach for predicting incident osteoporotic fractures (OF), employing a risk-weight calculation for each candidate risk factor. Methods: RD outpatients were picked up, and their histories, including OFs, were studied. A Cox regression analysis that evaluated candidate risk factors was conducted with a multivariate model. The variants were selected as candidate risk factors that showed statistical significance using a univariate model. Using the risk ratio or the β-value and p-value, different approaches to acquire a total risk weight (TRW) for each patient were determined to compare the sensitivity and specificity among the approach methods. The cut-off index (COI) was determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Sensitivity and specificity for incident OFs were determined using the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Results: In a total of 1228 patients, incidental OF occurred in 179 (14.58%) who were included. Factors with significantly higher risk ratios were a history of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures (p < 0.001), cognitive impairment (p < 0.001), anti-osteoporosis drug intervention (p < 0.001), and rehabilitation (p < 0.001). The excellent approach to acquire the best sensitivity and specificity was to calculate the β-value multiplied by the logarithm of the p-value based on 0.05, including non-significant factors (sensitivity: 31.2%, specificity: 94.9%, and area under the curve (AUC): 0.774) compared to 29.4%, 91.6%, and 0.723, respectively, with a counted significant risk factors approach. Conclusions: This novel approach, which includes non-significant factors, can achieve a more accurate sensitivity and specificity to accidental OF in patients with RDs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Osteology
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/osteology5010005
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk-Weight Calculation of Candidate Risk Factors for Incidental Osteoporotic Fracture in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: A Potentially Accurate Approach

Tatsumi Chijiwa, Ichiro Yoshii, Naoya Sawada
2 links
Osteology
Bone health and osteoporosis research
article

Risk-Weight Calculation of Candidate Risk Factors for Incidental Osteoporotic Fracture in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: A Potentially Accurate Approach

Tatsumi Chijiwa, Ichiro Yoshii, Naoya Sawada
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: To assess the risk of osteoporotic fractures in patients with rheumatic diseases (RDs), we introduced a new approach for predicting incident osteoporotic fractures (OF), employing a risk-weight calculation for each candidate risk factor. Methods: RD outpatients were picked up, and their histories, including OFs, were studied. A Cox regression analysis that evaluated candidate risk factors was conducted with a multivariate model. The variants were selected as candidate risk factors that showed statistical significance using a univariate model. Using the risk ratio or the β-value and p-value, different approaches to acquire a total risk weight (TRW) for each patient were determined to compare the sensitivity and specificity among the approach methods. The cut-off index (COI) was determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Sensitivity and specificity for incident OFs were determined using the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Results: In a total of 1228 patients, incidental OF occurred in 179 (14.58%) who were included. Factors with significantly higher risk ratios were a history of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures (p < 0.001), cognitive impairment (p < 0.001), anti-osteoporosis drug intervention (p < 0.001), and rehabilitation (p < 0.001). The excellent approach to acquire the best sensitivity and specificity was to calculate the β-value multiplied by the logarithm of the p-value based on 0.05, including non-significant factors (sensitivity: 31.2%, specificity: 94.9%, and area under the curve (AUC): 0.774) compared to 29.4%, 91.6%, and 0.723, respectively, with a counted significant risk factors approach. Conclusions: This novel approach, which includes non-significant factors, can achieve a more accurate sensitivity and specificity to accidental OF in patients with RDs.

OsteologyVol. 5(1)
Japanese Red Cross Kochi Hospital (JP), The Nakamura Hajime Eastern Institute (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.