On explaining why the (human) world is rich

The wealth of the modern world is a natural historical marvel. Explaining it has traditionally been the purview of economic historians, as exemplified by the recent book How the World Became Rich by Mark Koyama and Jared Rubin. Economic historians, though, tend to only ask process-oriented “how” and “by what means” questions of the Great Enrichment. The eight co-authors of Explaining Technology , who are not economic historians, engage the debate asking a different question. Their goal is to explain the exponential shape of our enrichment with a model of the combinatorial evolution of technology. With an eye toward how we ask questions of the Great Enrichment, I propose broadening our inquiries to include questions typically overlooked in modern economic science, namely, “What form does it take? and “For what purpose?”

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Economic Review
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2025.104969
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
72.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On explaining why the (human) world is rich

Bart J. Wilson
4 citations
European Economic Review
Philosophy and History of Science
72.10
article

On explaining why the (human) world is rich

Bart J. Wilson
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The wealth of the modern world is a natural historical marvel. Explaining it has traditionally been the purview of economic historians, as exemplified by the recent book How the World Became Rich by Mark Koyama and Jared Rubin. Economic historians, though, tend to only ask process-oriented “how” and “by what means” questions of the Great Enrichment. The eight co-authors of Explaining Technology , who are not economic historians, engage the debate asking a different question. Their goal is to explain the exponential shape of our enrichment with a model of the combinatorial evolution of technology. With an eye toward how we ask questions of the Great Enrichment, I propose broadening our inquiries to include questions typically overlooked in modern economic science, namely, “What form does it take? and “For what purpose?”

European Economic ReviewVol. 174
Smith Institute (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Philosophy and History of Science
72.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.