Toward a Future-Facing Climate Policy

This Article provides a systems analysis of climate change policy that links together subsystems relating to innovation, energy economics, interest group politics, and government regulation. It is easy but misleading to equate climate policy with emissions regulation. That is too narrow a frame. We urgently need a new energy system because of climate change, but regulating carbon emissions is only one part of a bigger project. We cannot assume that as carbon emissions decline a new energy system will build itself—nor will society be willing to eliminate fossil fuels without confidence in their replacements. An effective climate policy requires much more than simply restricting fossil fuels and hoping the market will fill the gap. The energy transition requires incentives for energy research, development, and scaling up new energy technologies. For the energy transition to happen, we also need sufficiently large-scale deployment to trigger economies of scale and learning by doing. There is much to be gained, then, from shifting the paradigm from emissions reduction to the energy transition. To make a homely analogy: The reason for a kitchen renovation may be dry rot, and the first step is ripping out rotten wood. But the point of the remodeling is putting in a new kitchen, not just getting rid of the rot.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Columbia Journal of Environmental Law
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52214/cjel.v50i1.13313
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward a Future-Facing Climate Policy

Daniel A. Farber
2 citations
Columbia Journal of Environmental Law
Climate Change Policy and Economics
6.26
article

Toward a Future-Facing Climate Policy

Daniel A. Farber
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This Article provides a systems analysis of climate change policy that links together subsystems relating to innovation, energy economics, interest group politics, and government regulation. It is easy but misleading to equate climate policy with emissions regulation. That is too narrow a frame. We urgently need a new energy system because of climate change, but regulating carbon emissions is only one part of a bigger project. We cannot assume that as carbon emissions decline a new energy system will build itself—nor will society be willing to eliminate fossil fuels without confidence in their replacements. An effective climate policy requires much more than simply restricting fossil fuels and hoping the market will fill the gap. The energy transition requires incentives for energy research, development, and scaling up new energy technologies. For the energy transition to happen, we also need sufficiently large-scale deployment to trigger economies of scale and learning by doing. There is much to be gained, then, from shifting the paradigm from emissions reduction to the energy transition. To make a homely analogy: The reason for a kitchen renovation may be dry rot, and the first step is ripping out rotten wood. But the point of the remodeling is putting in a new kitchen, not just getting rid of the rot.

Columbia Journal of Environmental LawVol. 50(1)
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Toward a Future-Facing Climate Policy — Daniel A. Farber · Columbia Journal of Environmental Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS