Soil Indicators of Pasture Digression in Different Types of Subalpine Meadows in the Central Caucasus

The article presents a comparative analysis of soil parameters in steppe, mesophytic and wet subalpine meadows at various digression stages (DS) in the Central Caucasus (within the Kabardino-Balkar Republic). Despite the genetic proximity, soils of different meadow types reacted differently to grazing. Consequently, soil indicators of pasture digression varied for each grassland type. Soils of steppe subalpine meadowswere the most dynamic, displaying negative changes even under moderate grazing load at DS2 compared to the least disturbed meadowsat DS1(0). In the upper soil horizons (0–20 cm) at the DS2 the bulk density increased by 25%, total soil carbon content Corg decreased by 36%, and the carbon content of microbial biomass Cmic decreased by 39% (t > 2.3; p < 0.03). At DS3 (severe degradation stage), all studied soil parameters of steppe meadows changed significantly (t > 2.9; p < 0.006), including basal respiration rate BR of soil microorganisms. It was established that the soil parameters did not change significantly. Under moderate controlled grazing (DS2) in mesophytic and wet subalpine meadows and the soil system remained stable. The most sustainable indicators of the severe grazing load (DS3) for mesophytic grasslands were Cmic with a 28% decrease (t > 2.4; p < 0.02), and the Cmic/Corg ratio. BR, Cmic and Corg, Cmic/Corg ratio were significantly reduced (t > 2.4; p < 0.03) at DS3 of wet subalpine meadows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biology Bulletin
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1062359024611534
Primary Topic
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soil Indicators of Pasture Digression in Different Types of Subalpine Meadows in the Central Caucasus

Е. М. Хакунова, Rustam Tembotov, О. Н. Горобцова, В. А. Чадаева
Biology Bulletin
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
article

Soil Indicators of Pasture Digression in Different Types of Subalpine Meadows in the Central Caucasus

Е. М. Хакунова, Rustam Tembotov, О. Н. Горобцова, В. А. Чадаева
article en

Abstract

The article presents a comparative analysis of soil parameters in steppe, mesophytic and wet subalpine meadows at various digression stages (DS) in the Central Caucasus (within the Kabardino-Balkar Republic). Despite the genetic proximity, soils of different meadow types reacted differently to grazing. Consequently, soil indicators of pasture digression varied for each grassland type. Soils of steppe subalpine meadowswere the most dynamic, displaying negative changes even under moderate grazing load at DS2 compared to the least disturbed meadowsat DS1(0). In the upper soil horizons (0–20 cm) at the DS2 the bulk density increased by 25%, total soil carbon content Corg decreased by 36%, and the carbon content of microbial biomass Cmic decreased by 39% (t > 2.3; p < 0.03). At DS3 (severe degradation stage), all studied soil parameters of steppe meadows changed significantly (t > 2.9; p < 0.006), including basal respiration rate BR of soil microorganisms. It was established that the soil parameters did not change significantly. Under moderate controlled grazing (DS2) in mesophytic and wet subalpine meadows and the soil system remained stable. The most sustainable indicators of the severe grazing load (DS3) for mesophytic grasslands were Cmic with a 28% decrease (t > 2.4; p < 0.02), and the Cmic/Corg ratio. BR, Cmic and Corg, Cmic/Corg ratio were significantly reduced (t > 2.4; p < 0.03) at DS3 of wet subalpine meadows.

Biology BulletinVol. 51(S2)
Institute of Ecology of Mountain Territories (RU)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.