Importance sampling of seismic tsunami sources with near-field emphasis for inundation PTHA: benchmarking with complete ensembles

SUMMARY Site-specific Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Assessment (PTHA) is a powerful tool for coastal planning against tsunami risk. However, its typically high computational demands led to the introduction of a Monte Carlo Stratified Importance Sampling (SIS) approach, which selects a representative subset of scenarios for numerical inundation simulations. We here empirically validate this sampling approach, for the first time to our knowledge, using an existing extensive data set of numerical inundation simulations for two coastal sites in the Mediterranean Sea (Catania and Siracusa, both located in Sicily, Italy). Moreover, we propose a modified importance sampling function to prioritize seismic tsunami scenarios based on their arrival time at an offshore point near the target site, in addition to their wave amplitude and occurrence rate as leveraged in the previous work. This sampling function is applied separately in each earthquake magnitude bin, and allows denser sampling of near-field earthquakes to whose variations tsunamis are very sensitive. We compare the confidence intervals of the offshore PTHA estimates obtained with the new and the original importance sampling functions. Then, we benchmark our onshore PTHA estimates obtained with both functions against the inundation PTHA calculated using the full set of scenarios. We also test the assumption that onshore random errors follow a normal distribution, as found previously for the offshore case. As a result of the benchmarks, we find that the SIS approach works satisfactorily. Introducing the arrival time as an additional sampling factor enhances the precision of the estimates of both the mean and the percentiles for the two coastal sites considered. With this modification it is possible to deal efficiently with heterogeneous near-field earthquake sources involving coastal deformation at Catania and Siracusa, in addition to regional crustal and subduction sources. By comparing the sampling errors with the model (epistemic) uncertainty, an optimal trade-off between the number of simulations employed and the uncertainty of the PTHA model can be found, even for such a complex situation. A relatively small number of scenarios, on the order of a few thousand, is sufficient to perform site-specific PTHA for practical applications. These numbers correspond to 4–8 per cent of the already reduced ensembles used in previous assessments at the same sites.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Journal International
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaf034
Citations
1
Primary Topic
earthquake and tectonic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Importance sampling of seismic tsunami sources with near-field emphasis for inundation PTHA: benchmarking with complete ensembles

Roberto Tonini, Stefano Lorito, Alice Abbate, Manuela Volpe et al.
1 citations
Geophysical Journal International
earthquake and tectonic studies
1.87
article

Importance sampling of seismic tsunami sources with near-field emphasis for inundation PTHA: benchmarking with complete ensembles

Roberto Tonini, Stefano Lorito, Alice Abbate, Manuela Volpe, Fabrizio Romano, Gareth Davies, Nikos Kalligeris
article en
1 citations

Abstract

SUMMARY Site-specific Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Assessment (PTHA) is a powerful tool for coastal planning against tsunami risk. However, its typically high computational demands led to the introduction of a Monte Carlo Stratified Importance Sampling (SIS) approach, which selects a representative subset of scenarios for numerical inundation simulations. We here empirically validate this sampling approach, for the first time to our knowledge, using an existing extensive data set of numerical inundation simulations for two coastal sites in the Mediterranean Sea (Catania and Siracusa, both located in Sicily, Italy). Moreover, we propose a modified importance sampling function to prioritize seismic tsunami scenarios based on their arrival time at an offshore point near the target site, in addition to their wave amplitude and occurrence rate as leveraged in the previous work. This sampling function is applied separately in each earthquake magnitude bin, and allows denser sampling of near-field earthquakes to whose variations tsunamis are very sensitive. We compare the confidence intervals of the offshore PTHA estimates obtained with the new and the original importance sampling functions. Then, we benchmark our onshore PTHA estimates obtained with both functions against the inundation PTHA calculated using the full set of scenarios. We also test the assumption that onshore random errors follow a normal distribution, as found previously for the offshore case. As a result of the benchmarks, we find that the SIS approach works satisfactorily. Introducing the arrival time as an additional sampling factor enhances the precision of the estimates of both the mean and the percentiles for the two coastal sites considered. With this modification it is possible to deal efficiently with heterogeneous near-field earthquake sources involving coastal deformation at Catania and Siracusa, in addition to regional crustal and subduction sources. By comparing the sampling errors with the model (epistemic) uncertainty, an optimal trade-off between the number of simulations employed and the uncertainty of the PTHA model can be found, even for such a complex situation. A relatively small number of scenarios, on the order of a few thousand, is sufficient to perform site-specific PTHA for practical applications. These numbers correspond to 4–8 per cent of the already reduced ensembles used in previous assessments at the same sites.

Geophysical Journal InternationalVol. 241(1)
Geoscience Australia (AU), University of Trieste (IT), Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (IT), National Observatory of Athens (GR), National Observatory (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
earthquake and tectonic studies
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.