“It is Strange to Call an Uzbek, a Jew, or a Latvian, Russian”: Stalin’s Nationalities Policy and the Question of Jewish Assimilation Revisited

Abstract The traditional Sovietological paradigm of Stalin’s nationalities policy—presented as an anti‐national policy geared toward the assimilation of non‐Russian ethnic groups in the supernational entity of the “Soviet people” and its Russian culture—has, in recent decades, given way to a more complex approach that has identified strong tendencies in the ideology and practice of Stalinist Bolshevism to foster “primordial” ethnic identities. Most of the historiography on Soviet Jews, however, has found it hard to break free of Cold‐War Sovietological assumptions and continues to view the policies of the Stalinist regime toward the Jews as seeking their assimilation and eventual disappearance. The present article attempts to re‐examine this view and point to the ambivalent and even negative attitude of Stalin and his acolytes to the issue of Jewish assimilation—this based on a closer reading of Stalin’s relevant writings and archival sources pertaining to the Birobidzhan project and the period of anti‐Jewish persecution, some of which have never been studied before, and on the critical insights of recent studies on the subject of Stalin’s nationalities policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Russian Review
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/russ.12739
Primary Topic
Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“It is Strange to Call an Uzbek, a Jew, or a Latvian, Russian”: Stalin’s Nationalities Policy and the Question of Jewish Assimilation Revisited

Dmitry Shumsky
The Russian Review
Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
article

“It is Strange to Call an Uzbek, a Jew, or a Latvian, Russian”: Stalin’s Nationalities Policy and the Question of Jewish Assimilation Revisited

Dmitry Shumsky
article en

Abstract

Abstract The traditional Sovietological paradigm of Stalin’s nationalities policy—presented as an anti‐national policy geared toward the assimilation of non‐Russian ethnic groups in the supernational entity of the “Soviet people” and its Russian culture—has, in recent decades, given way to a more complex approach that has identified strong tendencies in the ideology and practice of Stalinist Bolshevism to foster “primordial” ethnic identities. Most of the historiography on Soviet Jews, however, has found it hard to break free of Cold‐War Sovietological assumptions and continues to view the policies of the Stalinist regime toward the Jews as seeking their assimilation and eventual disappearance. The present article attempts to re‐examine this view and point to the ambivalent and even negative attitude of Stalin and his acolytes to the issue of Jewish assimilation—this based on a closer reading of Stalin’s relevant writings and archival sources pertaining to the Birobidzhan project and the period of anti‐Jewish persecution, some of which have never been studied before, and on the critical insights of recent studies on the subject of Stalin’s nationalities policy.

The Russian ReviewVol. 84(2)
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Israel Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.