Integrating spatial-temporal risk maps with candidate trajectory trees for explainable autonomous driving planning

With increasing public concern about autonomous vehicles, there is a growing demand for developing explainable autonomous driving planning technology. Traditional risk field methods use handcrafted potential field models to explain driving risks in a scenario. When explaining highly interactive scenarios, such prior knowledge-based methods still lack flexibility, leading to insufficient interpretability. In this study, we first propose the concept of a risk map that can be seen as a discrete, ego vehicle's view form of the risk field. We then design an explainable trajectory planning framework that integrates risk maps with the candidate trajectory tree generated by trajectory prediction models. We further filter safe candidate trajectories from the tree on the basis of their cumulative risks in the risk maps and then select the optimal trajectory to execute by balancing other driving objectives. The validation results in various real-world scenarios demonstrate that our method can generate understandable risk maps and explain the risk differences between trajectories. Open-loop experiments show our model's advantages in terms of safety and efficiency for the trajectory planning task. An analysis of runtime demonstrated its potential for real-world applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications in Transportation Research
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commtr.2025.100161
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating spatial-temporal risk maps with candidate trajectory trees for explainable autonomous driving planning

Cheng Chang, Jingwei Ge, Z. X. Li, Li Li et al.
4 citations
Communications in Transportation Research
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
2.73
article

Integrating spatial-temporal risk maps with candidate trajectory trees for explainable autonomous driving planning

Cheng Chang, Jingwei Ge, Z. X. Li, Li Li, Jiawei Zhang, Qiyuan Liu, Li Shen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

With increasing public concern about autonomous vehicles, there is a growing demand for developing explainable autonomous driving planning technology. Traditional risk field methods use handcrafted potential field models to explain driving risks in a scenario. When explaining highly interactive scenarios, such prior knowledge-based methods still lack flexibility, leading to insufficient interpretability. In this study, we first propose the concept of a risk map that can be seen as a discrete, ego vehicle's view form of the risk field. We then design an explainable trajectory planning framework that integrates risk maps with the candidate trajectory tree generated by trajectory prediction models. We further filter safe candidate trajectories from the tree on the basis of their cumulative risks in the risk maps and then select the optimal trajectory to execute by balancing other driving objectives. The validation results in various real-world scenarios demonstrate that our method can generate understandable risk maps and explain the risk differences between trajectories. Open-loop experiments show our model's advantages in terms of safety and efficiency for the trajectory planning task. An analysis of runtime demonstrated its potential for real-world applications.

Communications in Transportation ResearchVol. 5
Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
2.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.