How Accurate Can Large Vision Language Model Perform for Images with Compression Degradation?

The rapid evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) has spurred the development of Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs), which demonstrate remarkable proficiency in various computer vision tasks through corresponding input prompts. These models perform impressively on diverse multimodal benchmarks, matching the effectiveness of conventional task-specific models. Nonetheless, many experiments with LVLMs often assume that the images are pristine, overlooking potential information loss during image transmission. To explore how image compression affects the semantic analysis capabilities of LVLMs in real-world scenarios, this paper presents a new imagetext dataset named GPT-COMP. This dataset comprises 80,000 natural scene images, including 20,000 raw images from two public datasets. Each image is subjected to three different levels of compression distortion (QP = 32, 42, 52) using the latest Versatile Video Coding (VVC) Test Model. We leverage these variably compressed images in GPT-COMP to evaluate the state-of-the-art LVLM, GPT-4o, in vision understanding tasks. The text responses generated by GPT-4o are further organized into the GPT-COMP dataset and serve as the basis for evaluation. Specifically, the scene understanding capabilities regarding different compression levels are measured based on extracted semantic features and our proposed self-scoring strategy. This analysis sheds light on how image compression affects the semantic analysis capability of LLMs, offering valuable insights into the resilience of these models under realistic, suboptimal conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/apsipaasc63619.2025.10849295
Primary Topic
Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Accurate Can Large Vision Language Model Perform for Images with Compression Degradation?

Meng Wang, Shiqi Wang, Peilin Chen, Xiaohan Fang
Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
article

How Accurate Can Large Vision Language Model Perform for Images with Compression Degradation?

Meng Wang, Shiqi Wang, Peilin Chen, Xiaohan Fang
article en

Abstract

The rapid evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) has spurred the development of Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs), which demonstrate remarkable proficiency in various computer vision tasks through corresponding input prompts. These models perform impressively on diverse multimodal benchmarks, matching the effectiveness of conventional task-specific models. Nonetheless, many experiments with LVLMs often assume that the images are pristine, overlooking potential information loss during image transmission. To explore how image compression affects the semantic analysis capabilities of LVLMs in real-world scenarios, this paper presents a new imagetext dataset named GPT-COMP. This dataset comprises 80,000 natural scene images, including 20,000 raw images from two public datasets. Each image is subjected to three different levels of compression distortion (QP = 32, 42, 52) using the latest Versatile Video Coding (VVC) Test Model. We leverage these variably compressed images in GPT-COMP to evaluate the state-of-the-art LVLM, GPT-4o, in vision understanding tasks. The text responses generated by GPT-4o are further organized into the GPT-COMP dataset and serve as the basis for evaluation. Specifically, the scene understanding capabilities regarding different compression levels are measured based on extracted semantic features and our proposed self-scoring strategy. This analysis sheds light on how image compression affects the semantic analysis capability of LLMs, offering valuable insights into the resilience of these models under realistic, suboptimal conditions.

City University of Hong Kong (HK)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.