Quantifying CO<sub>2</sub> Emissions From Smaller Anthropogenic Point Sources Using OCO‐2 Target and OCO‐3 Snapshot Area Mapping Mode Observations

Abstract We quantify CO 2 emissions from smaller anthropogenic point sources compared with earlier satellite studies, which have mostly focused on mid‐sized (∼10 MtCO 2 /year) and larger fossil fuel burning power plants. Two types of Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) observation modes are used: OCO‐2 Target mode and OCO‐3 Snapshot Area Mapping (SAM) mode. Methods previously used with OCO‐3 SAMs are adapted to quantify CO 2 emissions with OCO‐2 Targets for the first time, demonstrating a similar capability to track emission changes at the Bełchatów Power Station. SAMs and Targets are then applied to quantify emissions from smaller sources in Canada: the Boundary Dam and Poplar River Power Stations in Saskatchewan, and the Suncor and Syncrude Mildred Lake mined oil sands processing facilities in northern Alberta. We verify our method on the nearby Colstrip Power Station in Montana by comparison with hourly reported values. For Canadian sources, only annual emissions are reported, to which our emission estimates cannot be directly compared. Emissions derived from a single satellite overpass correspond to daily or finer temporal scales and thus do not account for source intermittency or variability, which requires multiple revisits to reliably estimate annual emissions. Finally, we average OCO‐3 SAMs on repeated revisits to improve weak enhancement signals above background noise. Averaging SAMs yields mixed results, with improvements achieved only under certain conditions. These studies help to clarify the capabilities and limitations of CO 2 point source emission quantification with current satellites in advance of plans for operational monitoring with future CO 2 satellite missions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jd042333
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying CO2 Emissions From Smaller Anthropogenic Point Sources Using OCO‐2 Target and OCO‐3 Snapshot Area Mapping Mode Observations

Robert Nelson, Jon‐Paul Mastrogiacomo, Ray Nassar, Abhishek Chatterjee et al.
4 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
4.42
article

Quantifying CO2 Emissions From Smaller Anthropogenic Point Sources Using OCO‐2 Target and OCO‐3 Snapshot Area Mapping Mode Observations

Robert Nelson, Jon‐Paul Mastrogiacomo, Ray Nassar, Abhishek Chatterjee, C. O’Dell, Megan Dawson, Omid Moeini
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract We quantify CO 2 emissions from smaller anthropogenic point sources compared with earlier satellite studies, which have mostly focused on mid‐sized (∼10 MtCO 2 /year) and larger fossil fuel burning power plants. Two types of Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) observation modes are used: OCO‐2 Target mode and OCO‐3 Snapshot Area Mapping (SAM) mode. Methods previously used with OCO‐3 SAMs are adapted to quantify CO 2 emissions with OCO‐2 Targets for the first time, demonstrating a similar capability to track emission changes at the Bełchatów Power Station. SAMs and Targets are then applied to quantify emissions from smaller sources in Canada: the Boundary Dam and Poplar River Power Stations in Saskatchewan, and the Suncor and Syncrude Mildred Lake mined oil sands processing facilities in northern Alberta. We verify our method on the nearby Colstrip Power Station in Montana by comparison with hourly reported values. For Canadian sources, only annual emissions are reported, to which our emission estimates cannot be directly compared. Emissions derived from a single satellite overpass correspond to daily or finer temporal scales and thus do not account for source intermittency or variability, which requires multiple revisits to reliably estimate annual emissions. Finally, we average OCO‐3 SAMs on repeated revisits to improve weak enhancement signals above background noise. Averaging SAMs yields mixed results, with improvements achieved only under certain conditions. These studies help to clarify the capabilities and limitations of CO 2 point source emission quantification with current satellites in advance of plans for operational monitoring with future CO 2 satellite missions.

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 130(2)
Natural Resources Canada (CA), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA), University of Waterloo (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Colorado State University (US)
Environment and Climate Change Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.