Minimum Cost Consensus Modeling Considering Opinion-Based Variable Cost and Trust-Based Tolerance Constraints

In group decision making, reaching consensus is a complex process that requires a lot of time, energy, or resources to persuade decision makers (DMs) to make compromises. Consequently, how to balance the consensus cost and the tolerance constraints of DM to promote a harmonious consensus is a challenge. This article investigates the minimum cost consensus modeling (MCCM) considering opinion-based variable cost and trust-based tolerance constraints. Given that the existing models ignore the preference strategy manipulation of DMs, a dynamic opinion-based variable unit cost allocation mechanism is presented to prevent the preference manipulation behavior of DMs to a certain extent. To effectively reveal the adjust willingness of DMs in the consensus reaching process, an improved tolerance level measurement which incorporates the tolerance threshold, opinion deviation, and individual return satisfaction is developed to evaluate the compromise willingness of DMs. On this basis, a trust relationship-based tolerance threshold adjustment mechanism for the consensus feedback of MCCM is proposed. Meanwhile, a relative opinion similarity-based trust relationship updating approach is presented to promote the consensus efficiency. A case of regional air pollution collaborative governance is given to verify the practicability of the proposed model. Comparative studies show that the proposed model has stable consensus performance and lower consensus cost compared with existing models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tcss.2025.3529494
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Access Control and Trust
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Minimum Cost Consensus Modeling Considering Opinion-Based Variable Cost and Trust-Based Tolerance Constraints

Xiulai Wang, Yuhao Shan, Yejun Xu, Xia Liu
6 citations
IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems
Access Control and Trust
25.21
article

Minimum Cost Consensus Modeling Considering Opinion-Based Variable Cost and Trust-Based Tolerance Constraints

Xiulai Wang, Yuhao Shan, Yejun Xu, Xia Liu
article en
6 citations

Abstract

In group decision making, reaching consensus is a complex process that requires a lot of time, energy, or resources to persuade decision makers (DMs) to make compromises. Consequently, how to balance the consensus cost and the tolerance constraints of DM to promote a harmonious consensus is a challenge. This article investigates the minimum cost consensus modeling (MCCM) considering opinion-based variable cost and trust-based tolerance constraints. Given that the existing models ignore the preference strategy manipulation of DMs, a dynamic opinion-based variable unit cost allocation mechanism is presented to prevent the preference manipulation behavior of DMs to a certain extent. To effectively reveal the adjust willingness of DMs in the consensus reaching process, an improved tolerance level measurement which incorporates the tolerance threshold, opinion deviation, and individual return satisfaction is developed to evaluate the compromise willingness of DMs. On this basis, a trust relationship-based tolerance threshold adjustment mechanism for the consensus feedback of MCCM is proposed. Meanwhile, a relative opinion similarity-based trust relationship updating approach is presented to promote the consensus efficiency. A case of regional air pollution collaborative governance is given to verify the practicability of the proposed model. Comparative studies show that the proposed model has stable consensus performance and lower consensus cost compared with existing models.

IEEE Transactions on Computational Social SystemsVol. 12(5)
Tianjin University (CN), Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Access Control and Trust
25.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.