SpikeNAS-Bench: Benchmarking NAS Algorithms for Spiking Neural Network Architecture

In recent years, neural architecture search (NAS) has marked significant advancements, yet its efficacy is marred by the dependence on substantial computational resources. To mitigate this, the development of NAS benchmarks has emerged, offering datasets that enumerate all potential network architectures and their performances within a predefined search space. Nonetheless, these benchmarks predominantly focus on convolutional architectures, which are criticized for their limited interpretability and suboptimal hardware efficiency. Recognizing the untapped potential of spiking neural networks (SNNs)—often hailed as the third generation of neural networks due to their biological realism and computational thrift—this study introduces SpikeNAS-Bench. As a pioneering benchmark for SNN, SpikeNAS-Bench utilizes a cell-based search space, integrating leaky integrate-and-fire neurons with variable thresholds as candidate operations. It encompasses 15 625 candidate architectures, rigorously evaluated on CIFAR10, CIFAR100, and Tiny-ImageNet datasets. This article delves into the architectural nuances of SpikeNAS-Bench, leveraging various criteria to underscore the benchmark's utility and presenting insights that could steer future NAS algorithm designs. Moreover, we assess the benchmark's consistency through three distinct proxy types: zero-cost-based, early-stop-based, and predictor-based proxies. Additionally, the article benchmarks seven contemporary NAS algorithms to attest to SpikeNAS-Bench's broad applicability. We commit to providing training logs, diagnostic data for all candidate architectures, and we promise to release all code and datasets postacceptance, aiming to catalyze further exploration and innovation within the SNN domain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tai.2025.3534136
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SpikeNAS-Bench: Benchmarking NAS Algorithms for Spiking Neural Network Architecture

Zhengkun Liu, Biao Sun, Wenfeng Zhao, Hang Su et al.
3 citations
IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
2.19
article

SpikeNAS-Bench: Benchmarking NAS Algorithms for Spiking Neural Network Architecture

Zhengkun Liu, Biao Sun, Wenfeng Zhao, Hang Su, Ting Li, Lin Gan, Guo-Zheng Sun
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In recent years, neural architecture search (NAS) has marked significant advancements, yet its efficacy is marred by the dependence on substantial computational resources. To mitigate this, the development of NAS benchmarks has emerged, offering datasets that enumerate all potential network architectures and their performances within a predefined search space. Nonetheless, these benchmarks predominantly focus on convolutional architectures, which are criticized for their limited interpretability and suboptimal hardware efficiency. Recognizing the untapped potential of spiking neural networks (SNNs)—often hailed as the third generation of neural networks due to their biological realism and computational thrift—this study introduces SpikeNAS-Bench. As a pioneering benchmark for SNN, SpikeNAS-Bench utilizes a cell-based search space, integrating leaky integrate-and-fire neurons with variable thresholds as candidate operations. It encompasses 15 625 candidate architectures, rigorously evaluated on CIFAR10, CIFAR100, and Tiny-ImageNet datasets. This article delves into the architectural nuances of SpikeNAS-Bench, leveraging various criteria to underscore the benchmark's utility and presenting insights that could steer future NAS algorithm designs. Moreover, we assess the benchmark's consistency through three distinct proxy types: zero-cost-based, early-stop-based, and predictor-based proxies. Additionally, the article benchmarks seven contemporary NAS algorithms to attest to SpikeNAS-Bench's broad applicability. We commit to providing training logs, diagnostic data for all candidate architectures, and we promise to release all code and datasets postacceptance, aiming to catalyze further exploration and innovation within the SNN domain.

IEEE Transactions on Artificial IntelligenceVol. 6(6)
Binghamton University (US), Tianjin University (CN), Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.