Racionalidad, ciencia, sociedad y acción humana. Los límites del conocimiento y la racionalidad científica

This text analyzes the role of rationality and science in modern society and its limits on human action. Karl Marx argues that rationality, both in scientific knowledge and practice, is a key element to social change and progress, highlighting the relation between knowledge and power. Max Weber characterizes modernity in terms of rationalization which, although it fosters an optimal social action, it limits freedom and individual creativity due to bureaucratization. Weber also discriminates technical rationalization of subjective rationalization, pointing at the limits of scientific rationalization. Meanwhile, Norbert Elias considers civilization as the result of human interactions and not as a product of pure rationality. He maintains that science must point at what is possible, leaving the responsibility of decisions in the hands of the individual. He also warns against the illusion that social sciences can exempt the individual from his or her responsibility. This analysis provides a critical comprehension on how rationality and science influence social development and individual autonomy. Realidad: Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades No. 165, 2025: 8-32.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Realidad
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51378/realidad.vi165.8999
Primary Topic
Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racionalidad, ciencia, sociedad y acción humana. Los límites del conocimiento y la racionalidad científica

Mario Zetino Duarte
Realidad
Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
article

Racionalidad, ciencia, sociedad y acción humana. Los límites del conocimiento y la racionalidad científica

Mario Zetino Duarte
article en

Abstract

This text analyzes the role of rationality and science in modern society and its limits on human action. Karl Marx argues that rationality, both in scientific knowledge and practice, is a key element to social change and progress, highlighting the relation between knowledge and power. Max Weber characterizes modernity in terms of rationalization which, although it fosters an optimal social action, it limits freedom and individual creativity due to bureaucratization. Weber also discriminates technical rationalization of subjective rationalization, pointing at the limits of scientific rationalization. Meanwhile, Norbert Elias considers civilization as the result of human interactions and not as a product of pure rationality. He maintains that science must point at what is possible, leaving the responsibility of decisions in the hands of the individual. He also warns against the illusion that social sciences can exempt the individual from his or her responsibility. This analysis provides a critical comprehension on how rationality and science influence social development and individual autonomy. Realidad: Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades No. 165, 2025: 8-32.

Realidad(165)
Universidad Centroamericana José Simeón Cañas (SV)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Racionalidad, ciencia, sociedad y acción humana. Los límites del conocimiento y la racionalidad científica — Mario Zetino Duarte · Realidad (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS