The lean body mass to visceral fat mass ratio is negatively associated with cardiometabolic disorders: a cross-sectional study

The literature has documented conflicting and inconsistent associations between muscle-to-fat ratios and metabolic diseases. Additionally, different adipose tissues can have contrasting effects, with visceral adipose tissue being identified as particularly harmful. This study aimed to explore the relationship between the ratio of the lean mass index (LMI) to the visceral fat mass index (VFMI) and cardiometabolic disorders, including dyslipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes, as previous research on this topic is lacking. This cross-sectional study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) conducted in the United States and included 10,867 individuals. Logistic regression was employed to explore the association between LMI/VFMI and cardiometabolic disorders. Generalized additive models were utilized to examine the nonlinear relationships between variables. Data analysis revealed a consistent inverse association between ln(LMI/VFMI) and dyslipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes. Each 2.7-fold increase in LMI/VFMI (one unit of ln[LMI/VFMI]) was associated with lower odds ratios (ORs) for these conditions. In men, the ORs were 0.21 (95% CI 0.17-0.25) for dyslipidemia, 0.37 (95% CI 0.30-0.45) for hypertension, and 0.16 (95% CI 0.10-0.23) for diabetes. Similarly, in women, the ORs were 0.22 (95% CI 0.19-0.26), 0.51 (95% CI 0.42-0.61), and 0.19 (95% CI 0.13-0.27). Quartile analysis showed that participants in the highest quartile (Q4) had significantly lower ORs compared to those in the lowest quartile (Q1). In men, Q4 ORs were 0.18 (95% CI 0.14-0.23) for dyslipidemia, 0.30 (95% CI 0.23-0.39) for hypertension, and 0.11 (95% CI 0.06-0.20) for diabetes. In women, Q4 ORs were 0.12 (95% CI 0.10-0.15), 0.39 (95% CI 0.29-0.52), and 0.12 (95% CI 0.06-0.25), respectively. Dyslipidemia and diabetes demonstrated nonlinear patterns, while a linear association was found for hypertension. Subgroup analyses across various characteristics confirmed these findings with no substantial directional changes. Maintaining an appropriate ratio of LMI to VFMI may be associated with favorable metabolic health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-88167-1
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The lean body mass to visceral fat mass ratio is negatively associated with cardiometabolic disorders: a cross-sectional study

Meiling Shao, Longti Li, Huiqin Zhong, Ya Shao et al.
7 citations
Scientific Reports
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
9.48
article

The lean body mass to visceral fat mass ratio is negatively associated with cardiometabolic disorders: a cross-sectional study

Meiling Shao, Longti Li, Huiqin Zhong, Ya Shao, Na Wang, Yu Wang, Bin Liu, Yan Yang
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The literature has documented conflicting and inconsistent associations between muscle-to-fat ratios and metabolic diseases. Additionally, different adipose tissues can have contrasting effects, with visceral adipose tissue being identified as particularly harmful. This study aimed to explore the relationship between the ratio of the lean mass index (LMI) to the visceral fat mass index (VFMI) and cardiometabolic disorders, including dyslipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes, as previous research on this topic is lacking. This cross-sectional study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) conducted in the United States and included 10,867 individuals. Logistic regression was employed to explore the association between LMI/VFMI and cardiometabolic disorders. Generalized additive models were utilized to examine the nonlinear relationships between variables. Data analysis revealed a consistent inverse association between ln(LMI/VFMI) and dyslipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes. Each 2.7-fold increase in LMI/VFMI (one unit of ln[LMI/VFMI]) was associated with lower odds ratios (ORs) for these conditions. In men, the ORs were 0.21 (95% CI 0.17-0.25) for dyslipidemia, 0.37 (95% CI 0.30-0.45) for hypertension, and 0.16 (95% CI 0.10-0.23) for diabetes. Similarly, in women, the ORs were 0.22 (95% CI 0.19-0.26), 0.51 (95% CI 0.42-0.61), and 0.19 (95% CI 0.13-0.27). Quartile analysis showed that participants in the highest quartile (Q4) had significantly lower ORs compared to those in the lowest quartile (Q1). In men, Q4 ORs were 0.18 (95% CI 0.14-0.23) for dyslipidemia, 0.30 (95% CI 0.23-0.39) for hypertension, and 0.11 (95% CI 0.06-0.20) for diabetes. In women, Q4 ORs were 0.12 (95% CI 0.10-0.15), 0.39 (95% CI 0.29-0.52), and 0.12 (95% CI 0.06-0.25), respectively. Dyslipidemia and diabetes demonstrated nonlinear patterns, while a linear association was found for hypertension. Subgroup analyses across various characteristics confirmed these findings with no substantial directional changes. Maintaining an appropriate ratio of LMI to VFMI may be associated with favorable metabolic health.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Hubei University of Medicine (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
9.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.