Automating the practice of science: Opportunities, challenges, and implications

Automation transformed various aspects of our human civilization, revolutionizing industries and streamlining processes. In the domain of scientific inquiry, automated approaches emerged as powerful tools, holding promise for accelerating discovery, enhancing reproducibility, and overcoming the traditional impediments to scientific progress. This article evaluates the scope of automation within scientific practice and assesses recent approaches. Furthermore, it discusses different perspectives to the following questions: where do the greatest opportunities lie for automation in scientific practice?; What are the current bottlenecks of automating scientific practice?; and What are significant ethical and practical consequences of automating scientific practice? By discussing the motivations behind automated science, analyzing the hurdles encountered, and examining its implications, this article invites researchers, policymakers, and stakeholders to navigate the rapidly evolving frontier of automated scientific practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2401238121
Citations
22
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automating the practice of science: Opportunities, challenges, and implications

Suhas Mahesh, Ross D. King, Sebastian Musslick, Marina Dubova et al.
22 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Machine Learning in Materials Science
11.39
article

Automating the practice of science: Opportunities, challenges, and implications

Suhas Mahesh, Ross D. King, Sebastian Musslick, Marina Dubova, Suyog Chandramouli, Sabina J. Sloman, Laura Bartlett, Jessica Hullman, Franco Pestilli, Fernand R. Gobet, Thomas L. Griffiths, William R. Holmes, J. Nathan Kutz, Christopher G. Lucas
article en
22 citations

Abstract

Automation transformed various aspects of our human civilization, revolutionizing industries and streamlining processes. In the domain of scientific inquiry, automated approaches emerged as powerful tools, holding promise for accelerating discovery, enhancing reproducibility, and overcoming the traditional impediments to scientific progress. This article evaluates the scope of automation within scientific practice and assesses recent approaches. Furthermore, it discusses different perspectives to the following questions: where do the greatest opportunities lie for automation in scientific practice?; What are the current bottlenecks of automating scientific practice?; and What are significant ethical and practical consequences of automating scientific practice? By discussing the motivations behind automated science, analyzing the hurdles encountered, and examining its implications, this article invites researchers, policymakers, and stakeholders to navigate the rapidly evolving frontier of automated scientific practice.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(5)
Northwestern University (US), University of Alberta (CA), Osnabrück University (DE), University of Toronto (CA), Princeton University (US), University of Washington (US), University of Cambridge (GB), Brown University (US), Science North (CA), University of Manchester (GB), Indiana University Bloomington (US), Division of Materials Science and Engineering (AU), Indiana University (US), Chalmers University of Technology (SE), The University of Texas at Austin (US), University of Roehampton (GB), Hologic (Germany) (DE), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB), Aalto University (FI)
National Science Foundation, Brown University, UK Research and Innovation, Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse, Nokia Foundation, NOMIS Stiftung, Finnish Center for Artificial Intelligence, National Institutes of Health, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, European Research Council, Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure, Division of Information and Intelligent Systems
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
11.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.