Discourse on measurement

Measurement literacy is required for strong scientific reasoning, effective experimental design, conceptual and empirical validation of measurement quantities, and the intelligible interpretation of error in theory construction. This discourse examines how issues in measurement are posed and resolved and addresses potential misunderstandings. Examples drawn from across the sciences are used to show that measurement literacy promotes the goals of scientific discourse and provides the necessary foundation for carving out perspectives and carrying out interventions in science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2401229121
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
36.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discourse on measurement

John C. Dunn, Julia M. Haaf, Clintin P. Davis‐Stober, M. Ali Khan et al.
2 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Philosophy and History of Science
36.05
article

Discourse on measurement

John C. Dunn, Julia M. Haaf, Clintin P. Davis‐Stober, M. Ali Khan, David Kellen, Michael L. Kalish, Katya Tentori, Conor Mayo‐Wilson, Arthur Paul Pedersen, Maxwell B. Stinchcombe
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Measurement literacy is required for strong scientific reasoning, effective experimental design, conceptual and empirical validation of measurement quantities, and the intelligible interpretation of error in theory construction. This discourse examines how issues in measurement are posed and resolved and addresses potential misunderstandings. Examples drawn from across the sciences are used to show that measurement literacy promotes the goals of scientific discourse and provides the necessary foundation for carving out perspectives and carrying out interventions in science.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(5)
Johns Hopkins University (US), City University of New York (US), University of Potsdam (DE), The University of Western Australia (AU), University of Trento (IT), University of Washington (US), Remote Sensing Systems (United States) (US), Syracuse University (US), University of Missouri (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Defense, Johns Hopkins University, National Institutes of Health, Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function, Australian Research Council, Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Philosophy and History of Science
36.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.