Three-dimensional soil salinity mapping with uncertainty using Bayesian Hierarchical Modelling, Random Forest Regression and remote sensing data

Understanding the variation of soil salinity across time and space provides critical information for soil salinity management. This study presents two models using Bayesian Hierarchical Modelling (BHM) and Random Forest Regression (RFR) to predict soil electrical conductivity of a saturated soil extract (ECe) in a coastal area in south Sindh (9707 km2), Pakistan, annually from 2014−15 to 2020−21. Both models were developed using remote sensing imagery and Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data as predictors based on 195 soil salinity samples (N = 65 for each 0–20 cm, 20–40 cm, 40–60 cm layer). Predictive accuracy, prediction uncertainty, predictor effects and other aspects of BHM and RFR were compared before being used for salinity mapping. Results show that BHM and RFR had similar and moderate accuracy in soil salinity prediction in the leave-one-location-out cross-validation (R2 = 0.45–0.51 for BHM and R2 = 0.48–0.52 for RFR); however, the prediction uncertainty was generally smaller in BHM than in RFR. Both models had good agreement with predictor effects, with the vegetation-based index summarising annual biomass accumulation (the integrated area under the EVI time series; AUC_EVI) identified as the most important predictor for all soil layers. Sensitive predictors for explaining soil salinity varied between the surface layer (0–20 cm) and the root zone (20–40 cm and 40–60 cm). The annual average predicted soil salinity maps from BHM and RFR showed a clear spatial variation. Importantly, the uncertainty in salinity prediction in the main agricultural area was also evident and spatially variable, and having this uncertainty insight improves the credibility of the salinity maps. About 34.9–54.5 % of the land in the main agricultural area has been affected by salinity at different levels of severity from 2014−15 to 2020−21. The modelling approach proposed in this study provides informative annual salinity maps using solely publicly available data in a process that requires minimal human intervention. Its adoption would significantly benefit how salinity is managed in south Sindh.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Water Management
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109318
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three-dimensional soil salinity mapping with uncertainty using Bayesian Hierarchical Modelling, Random Forest Regression and remote sensing data

Altaf Ali Siyal, Zitian Gao, Jorge L. Peña‐Arancibia, Mobin‐ud‐Din Ahmad
16 citations
Agricultural Water Management
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
12.79
article

Three-dimensional soil salinity mapping with uncertainty using Bayesian Hierarchical Modelling, Random Forest Regression and remote sensing data

Altaf Ali Siyal, Zitian Gao, Jorge L. Peña‐Arancibia, Mobin‐ud‐Din Ahmad
article en
16 citations

Abstract

Understanding the variation of soil salinity across time and space provides critical information for soil salinity management. This study presents two models using Bayesian Hierarchical Modelling (BHM) and Random Forest Regression (RFR) to predict soil electrical conductivity of a saturated soil extract (ECe) in a coastal area in south Sindh (9707 km2), Pakistan, annually from 2014−15 to 2020−21. Both models were developed using remote sensing imagery and Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data as predictors based on 195 soil salinity samples (N = 65 for each 0–20 cm, 20–40 cm, 40–60 cm layer). Predictive accuracy, prediction uncertainty, predictor effects and other aspects of BHM and RFR were compared before being used for salinity mapping. Results show that BHM and RFR had similar and moderate accuracy in soil salinity prediction in the leave-one-location-out cross-validation (R2 = 0.45–0.51 for BHM and R2 = 0.48–0.52 for RFR); however, the prediction uncertainty was generally smaller in BHM than in RFR. Both models had good agreement with predictor effects, with the vegetation-based index summarising annual biomass accumulation (the integrated area under the EVI time series; AUC_EVI) identified as the most important predictor for all soil layers. Sensitive predictors for explaining soil salinity varied between the surface layer (0–20 cm) and the root zone (20–40 cm and 40–60 cm). The annual average predicted soil salinity maps from BHM and RFR showed a clear spatial variation. Importantly, the uncertainty in salinity prediction in the main agricultural area was also evident and spatially variable, and having this uncertainty insight improves the credibility of the salinity maps. About 34.9–54.5 % of the land in the main agricultural area has been affected by salinity at different levels of severity from 2014−15 to 2020−21. The modelling approach proposed in this study provides informative annual salinity maps using solely publicly available data in a process that requires minimal human intervention. Its adoption would significantly benefit how salinity is managed in south Sindh.

Agricultural Water ManagementVol. 309
Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
12.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.