Individual differences in intolerance of uncertainty is primarily linked to the structure of inferior frontal regions

Increased intolerance of uncertainty (IU), or distress felt when encountering situations with unknown outcomes, occurs transdiagnostically across various forms of psychopathology and is targeted in therapeutic intervention. Increased intolerance of uncertainty shows overlap with symptoms of internalizing disorders, such as depression and anxiety, including negative affect and anxious apprehension (worry). While neuroanatomical correlates of IU have been reported, previous investigations have not disentangled the specific neural substrates of IU above and beyond any overlapping relationships with aspects of internalizing psychopathology. The current study did so in a sample of 42 adults and 79 adolescents, who completed questionnaires assessing IU and internalizing symptoms, and underwent structural MRI. When controlling for internalizing symptoms, across adults and adolescents, specific associations of IU were found with the structure of the inferior frontal cortex and orbitofrontal cortex, regions implicated in cognitive control and emotional valuation/regulation. In addition, in adolescents, associations were observed with rostral middle frontal cortex and portions of the cingulate cortex. No associations were observed with threat-related regions, such as the amygdala. Potential cognitive/emotional mechanisms that might explain the association between individual differences in intolerance of uncertainty and morphology of the inferior frontal cortex are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2025-01-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-024-01262-0
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Individual differences in intolerance of uncertainty is primarily linked to the structure of inferior frontal regions

Louisa L. Smith, Marie T. Banich, Hannah R. Snyder, Benjamin L. Hankin et al.
4 citations
Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
8.47
article

Individual differences in intolerance of uncertainty is primarily linked to the structure of inferior frontal regions

Louisa L. Smith, Marie T. Banich, Hannah R. Snyder, Benjamin L. Hankin, Kenneth W. Carlson, Harry R. Smolker
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Increased intolerance of uncertainty (IU), or distress felt when encountering situations with unknown outcomes, occurs transdiagnostically across various forms of psychopathology and is targeted in therapeutic intervention. Increased intolerance of uncertainty shows overlap with symptoms of internalizing disorders, such as depression and anxiety, including negative affect and anxious apprehension (worry). While neuroanatomical correlates of IU have been reported, previous investigations have not disentangled the specific neural substrates of IU above and beyond any overlapping relationships with aspects of internalizing psychopathology. The current study did so in a sample of 42 adults and 79 adolescents, who completed questionnaires assessing IU and internalizing symptoms, and underwent structural MRI. When controlling for internalizing symptoms, across adults and adolescents, specific associations of IU were found with the structure of the inferior frontal cortex and orbitofrontal cortex, regions implicated in cognitive control and emotional valuation/regulation. In addition, in adolescents, associations were observed with rostral middle frontal cortex and portions of the cingulate cortex. No associations were observed with threat-related regions, such as the amygdala. Potential cognitive/emotional mechanisms that might explain the association between individual differences in intolerance of uncertainty and morphology of the inferior frontal cortex are discussed.

Cognitive Affective & Behavioral NeuroscienceVol. 25(3)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), Brandeis University (US)
National Institute of Mental Health
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
8.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.