The Concept of Reforming Military Justice System Specifically in the Termination of Investigations on the Regulation of Institutions and Authority of Military Police Investigations in Indonesia

Objective: Military Criminal Procedure Law (HAPMIL) (Law No 31 of 1997) on Military Justice was found to require legal reform to correlate with current legal developments. The substance of this law should further adapt to evolving legal principles including the prompt resolution of cases and the realization of justice as well as legal benefits which were the objectives long desired in the scope of Military Justice in Indonesia. Theoretical Framework: In this context, there have been no regulations allowing Military Police Investigators (POM) to terminate military case during the investigation stage, even when valid reasons for termination exist. Therefore, this study aimed to address the lack of authority granted to POM to terminate investigations which undermined the effectiveness of legal processes. Method: The analysis further used a normative legal approach and concluded that empowering POM investigators with authority to terminate investigations would enhance the efficiency of law enforcement. Results and Discussion: Specifically, when POM determined that an investigation lacked sufficient evidence to proceed terminating the process in accordance with legal provisions would ensure fairness and clarity for both the accused and investigators. Research Implications: This study provides valuable insights for policymakers, agricultural practitioners, and stakeholders in Magetan Regency. Originality/Value: This research offers a unique contribution to the existing literature on food security and land use planning. The findings of this study can be applied to other regions facing similar challenges, making it a valuable resource for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners.